16-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis · Undated paper
Question 2 of 9: Schematic shear force and bending moment diagrams
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams – May 2019,
16-Civ-B1 Advanced Structural Analysis. Three hours, closed book (an approved Casio or
Sharp calculator is the only aid). Nine questions: #1 and #2 are compulsory,
then any two of #3, #4, #5 and any two of #6, #7, #8, #9 —
six questions constitute a complete paper and total 100 marks. Marks are printed in the left
margin (9, 11, 18, 18, 18, 22, 22, 22, 22). All nine questions are solved here,
because the set is a study resource rather than a three-hour sitting.
Reference texts. R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed.
(slope-deflection, moment distribution, Castigliano and the force method);
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. (degrees of freedom, influence of support
settlement and lack of fit); J. C. McCormac, Structural Analysis: Using Classical and
Matrix Methods, 5th ed. (matrix formulation of the stiffness equations);
CSA S16:19 Design of Steel Structures and CSA A23.3:19 Design of Concrete
Structures for the Canadian design context in which these analyses are used.
Question 2: Schematic shear force and bending moment diagrams (11 marks)
Given. (a) A beam built in at A, carried on rollers at B and C and
overhanging past C to a free end D, with a uniformly distributed load $w$ acting only between
the two rollers and a point load $P$ at the free end. (b) A single-bay portal with both column
bases built in, unloaded, in which every member elongates because of a uniform rise in
temperature. No dimensions or load magnitudes are printed — the question asks for the
shapes of the diagrams, not for ordinates.
Find. The shear force and bending moment diagrams of both
structures, drawn schematically with the correct curvature, discontinuities and points of
contraflexure.
Check: the paper prints no spans, no $w$ and
no $P$, so no numerical ordinate can be quoted. The diagrams below were generated for the
representative proportions AB : BC : CD = 6 : 8 : 3 with $w = 10$ kN/m and $P = 20$ kN, purely
so that the curvature and the sign changes are drawn to scale. Only the shape is part
of the answer; the one ordinate that is exact for any geometry is
$M_C = -P\,a$ at the inner face of the overhang support.
Part (a): the beam, and the shape of its shear force and bending moment diagrams.
Approach. For (a) read the diagram shapes straight off the loading
— constant shear and linear moment where there is no load, linear shear and parabolic
moment under the UDL, a jump in shear at every support — and fix the two ends from
statics. For (b) recognise that a uniform temperature rise is a prescribed deformation, not a
load: the free thermal elongation of the beam is imposed on the frame and the columns resist
it, so the whole problem reduces to a symmetric sway.
Part (a) — classify the three segments. Segment AB carries no
transverse load, so its shear is constant and its moment varies linearly. Segment BC carries the
UDL, so its shear falls linearly at $-w$ per metre and its moment is a parabola opening
downwards. Segment CD carries only the tip load, so its shear is constant at $P$ and its moment
is linear.
Part (a) — fix the two ends exactly. The overhang is
determinate, so cutting just inside C gives, for an overhang of length $a$,
$$\boxed{M_C = -P\,a}$$
which is a hogging moment and is the one ordinate that does not depend on the (unstated) spans.
At the built-in end A there is no load between A and B, so the moment there is the carry-over
from B on a propped cantilever, $M_A = \tfrac{1}{2}M_B$ in the slope-deflection sense; because
the carry-over reverses the physical curvature, A is in sagging while B is in hogging.
That sign reversal is the feature the examiner is looking for.
Part (a) — assemble the diagrams. The shear steps up at each
roller by that roller's reaction and is continuous elsewhere; it crosses zero once inside span
BC, and that crossing locates the single sagging peak of the parabola. The moment diagram is
therefore: a short sagging region from A, crossing to hogging before B; a hogging peak at B; a
sagging hump inside BC; a hogging peak at C of magnitude $P\,a$; and a straight run back to zero
at the free end D. Two points of contraflexure appear in span BC and one in span AB.
Part (b) — recognise what a temperature rise does. The columns
elongate freely, because nothing holds the beam down; they simply lift it, and no force is
generated. The beam is the member that matters: its free elongation
$\delta_T = \alpha\,\Delta T\,L$ must be accommodated while the two built-in bases stay a fixed
distance apart, so each column top is pushed outwards by
$$\Delta = \tfrac{1}{2}\delta_T$$
and the entire response is the frame's resistance to that prescribed sway.
Part (b) — deduce the shapes from symmetry. The structure and
the imposed deformation are mirror-symmetric, so the two beam-end rotations are equal and
opposite. Writing the beam slope-deflection equations with $\theta_3 = -\theta_2$ gives
$$M_{23} = \frac{2EI}{L}(2\theta_2 + \theta_3) = \frac{2EI}{L}\theta_2,
\qquad M_{32} = -\frac{2EI}{L}\theta_2$$
so the two end moments are equal and opposite in the slope-deflection sense, which means the
beam carries a constant bending moment and therefore zero shear. The joint
condition $M_{21} + M_{23} = 0$ then gives
$$\theta_2 = \frac{3\,\Delta\,L}{h\,(2L + h)}$$
Part (b) — draw them. Each column has no transverse load, so
its moment is linear; substituting $\theta_2$ back shows both column end moments carry the
same sign, so the column bends in single curvature with no point of contraflexure, the
base moment being the larger. The column shear is constant and equals the axial thrust delivered
along the beam, so the beam is in axial compression while carrying constant moment and no
shear.
Part (b) — sanity check the whole picture. Global horizontal
equilibrium is satisfied because the two column shears are equal and opposite; global vertical
equilibrium is trivial because nothing is loaded vertically; and if the beam were released
axially every internal force would vanish, which is the correct limiting behaviour of a
statically determinate frame under a uniform temperature change.
Part (b): the heated portal, its deformed shape, and the shape of the resulting bending moment diagram.