NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B10 Traffic Engineering: December 2013

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

  1. Question 1 Poisson Arrivals and Negative Exponential Headways
  2. Question 2 Freeway Service Flow Rate and Signalised-Intersection Capacity
  3. Question 3 Mean Speeds and the Linear Speed–Density Relationship
  4. Question 4 Deterministic Queueing at an Incident Bottleneck
  5. Question 5 Statistical Significance of a Change in Mean Spot Speed
  6. Question 6 Volume and Travel Time by the Moving-Vehicle Method
  7. Question 7 Alternate-System Signal Progression in a Grid

Start with Question 1 →

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2013 — 98-Civ-B10 Traffic Engineering. Three-hour, open-book examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Seven questions are printed and five complete solutions are required, all questions being of equal value. The printed grading scheme is Q1 (a) 6, (b) 6, (c) 8; Q2 (a) 10, (b) 10; Q3 (a) 10, (b) 10; Q4 20; Q5 20; Q6 (a)–(d) 5 each; Q7 (a)–(d) 5 each. The paper also states that if doubt exists as to the interpretation of a question the candidate should submit a clear statement of any assumptions made, and that any data required but not given can be assumed. All seven questions are worked below.

Reference texts.

Check: assumed reference-table values. Questions 2(a) and 2(b) are capacity problems whose input list — lane width, lateral obstruction, per-cent heavy vehicles, a specific grade, design speed and a target level of service — is exactly the argument list of the classical Highway Capacity Manual equations, but the paper does not reproduce the lookup tables. Consistent with the paper's own instruction that any data required but not given may be assumed, every table value used is stated explicitly at the point of use, drawn from one coherent edition family (HCM 1985/1994, ideal capacity 2,000 pc/h/ln for the freeway segment). Substituting another edition's tables rescales the final flow rate but changes neither the method nor the arithmetic chain; the sensitivity is discussed in the Question 2(a) concept note.