Question 7 of 7: Alternate-System Signal Progression in a Grid
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2013 —
98-Civ-B10 Traffic Engineering. Three-hour, open-book
examination; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Seven questions are
printed and five complete solutions are required, all questions being of equal
value. The printed grading scheme is Q1 (a) 6, (b) 6, (c) 8; Q2 (a) 10, (b) 10;
Q3 (a) 10, (b) 10; Q4 20; Q5 20; Q6 (a)–(d) 5 each; Q7 (a)–(d) 5 each.
The paper also states that if doubt exists as to the interpretation of a question
the candidate should submit a clear statement of any assumptions made, and that
any data required but not given can be assumed. All seven questions are worked below.
Reference texts.
Garber, N. J. and Hoel, L. A., Traffic and Highway Engineering,
5th ed. — Ch. 4 (traffic engineering studies: spot-speed statistics, volume
and travel-time studies, the moving-vehicle method), Ch. 6 (fundamental
principles of traffic flow: time-mean and space-mean speed, speed–density
models, Poisson arrivals, deterministic queueing), Ch. 8 (intersection control
and signalisation: progression and time–space diagrams), Ch. 9 (capacity and
level of service for highway segments), Ch. 10 (capacity and level of service at
signalised intersections). This is the principal reference for the subject.
Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) —
basic freeway segments and signalised-intersection saturation flow.
Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Geometric Design Guide for
Canadian Roads — Canadian lane-width, shoulder and clearance practice.
TAC, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Canada (MUTCDC)
— Canadian signal warrants, timing and coordination practice.
Institute of Transportation Engineers, Traffic Engineering Handbook
— signal-system progression and alternate-system design.
Check: assumed reference-table values.
Questions 2(a) and 2(b) are capacity problems whose input list — lane width,
lateral obstruction, per-cent heavy vehicles, a specific grade, design speed and a
target level of service — is exactly the argument list of the classical
Highway Capacity Manual equations, but the paper does not reproduce the lookup
tables. Consistent with the paper's own instruction that any data required but
not given may be assumed, every table value used is stated explicitly at the point
of use, drawn from one coherent edition family (HCM 1985/1994, ideal capacity
2,000 pc/h/ln for the freeway segment). Substituting another edition's tables
rescales the final flow rate but changes neither the method nor the arithmetic
chain; the sensitivity is discussed in the Question 2(a) concept note.
Question 7: Alternate-System Signal Progression in a Grid
(20 marks: (a)–(d) 5 each)
Given. A signalised CBD grid with two different signal
spacings and one desired progression speed.
Quantity
Value
Signal spacing along north-south streets
LNS = 150 m
Signal spacing along east-west streets
LEW = 200 m
Desired progression speed, both directions
50 km/h = 13.889 m/s
Assumed split at each signal
two-phase, 50 % effective green (g = C/2)
Practical CBD cycle range assumed
about 40 to 90 s
Find. (a) which alternate system suits each street family;
(b) a single system-wide cycle length to the nearest 5 s; (c) the progression
speeds that cycle actually delivers; and (d) the time–space diagram showing
the through band and its width.
Approach. In an alternate system the cycle length is not
free: it is fixed by the spacing and the desired speed. Compute the cycle each
candidate system would demand, discard those that fall outside a practical range,
choose one cycle for the whole grid so that the two street families can be
coordinated together, then work backwards to the speeds and draw the
time–space diagram to measure the band.
Part (a) — relate cycle length to spacing and speed.
In a single-alternate system adjacent signals show opposite indications, so a
platoon must cover one block in half a cycle; in a double-alternate system pairs of
signals share an indication and the platoon covers two blocks per half cycle; in a
triple-alternate system, three blocks. Writing \(n\) = 1, 2 or 3 for the group size,
$$v=\frac{2nL}{C}\qquad\Longleftrightarrow\qquad C=\frac{2nL}{v}$$
so the required cycle rises in proportion to both the group size and the block
length.
Evaluate the required cycle for every candidate. With
\(v=50/3.6=13.889\) m/s:
$$\begin{aligned}
\text{150 m spacing:}\quad & C_{single}=\frac{2(150)}{13.889}=21.6\ \text{s},\quad
C_{double}=43.2\ \text{s},\quad C_{triple}=64.8\ \text{s}\\
\text{200 m spacing:}\quad & C_{single}=\frac{2(200)}{13.889}=28.8\ \text{s},\quad
C_{double}=57.6\ \text{s},\quad C_{triple}=86.4\ \text{s}
\end{aligned}$$
Rule out the single-alternate system. A single-alternate
system would need a cycle of 21.6 s on the north-south streets and 28.8 s on the
east-west streets. Both are far below any workable CBD cycle: after allowing the
minimum green a pedestrian needs to cross a two-lane street plus yellow and
all-red clearance, a two-phase CBD signal cannot operate below roughly 40 s, and
40 to 60 s is normal.
$$\boxed{\text{Single alternate is unsuitable — it demands a 22 to 29 s cycle}}$$
The triple-alternate system on the 200 m streets fails at the other end, needing
86.4 s, which lengthens pedestrian waits and delay unnecessarily. That leaves
double alternate at 43.2 s or triple alternate at 64.8 s on the 150 m streets, and
double alternate at 57.6 s on the 200 m streets.
Choose one system per street family so that a single cycle serves
the whole grid. Every signal in a coordinated network must run the same
cycle, so the requirement is one \(C\) that suits both families. The pair
$$C_{triple}^{NS}=64.8\ \text{s}\qquad\text{and}\qquad C_{double}^{EW}=57.6\ \text{s}$$
bracket the same region, whereas no other combination comes close (the next-best
pairing, double alternate on both, would need 43.2 s and 57.6 s — a 33 %
mismatch). Hence:
$$\boxed{\text{triple alternate on the north-south (150 m) streets, }
\text{double alternate on the east-west (200 m) streets}}$$
Part (b) — settle the cycle length. A cycle between
57.6 s and 64.8 s satisfies both families as closely as possible; rounding to the
nearest five seconds and balancing the two errors gives
$$\boxed{C=60\ \text{s}}$$
This is a standard CBD cycle. Choosing 65 s instead would match the north-south
streets almost exactly but leave the east-west progression 11 % slow, whereas 60 s
splits the discrepancy: 8 % fast one way, 4 % slow the other.
Part (c) — compute the actual speeds of progression.
Inverting \(v=2nL/C\) with \(C=60\) s:
$$v_{NS}=\frac{6(150)}{60}=15.00\ \text{m/s}
\qquad\Rightarrow\qquad \boxed{v_{NS}=54.0\ \text{km/h}}$$
$$v_{EW}=\frac{4(200)}{60}=13.33\ \text{m/s}
\qquad\Rightarrow\qquad \boxed{v_{EW}=48.0\ \text{km/h}}$$
Both lie within 8 % of the 50 km/h target, which is well inside normal driver
tolerance. The block travel times that go with these speeds are
\(150/15.00=10.0\) s north-south and \(200/13.33=15.0\) s east-west.
Part (d) — construct the time–space diagram and read the
band. Plot distance against time, mark each signal's green and red
periods along its own horizontal line, and draw the two extreme vehicle
trajectories at the progression speed that clear every signal. Their horizontal
separation is the band width. For the north-south triple-alternate system with
\(C=60\) s and 30 s of green, a platoon leaving the first signal between \(t=0\) and
\(t=10\) s meets green at all seven signals, and one leaving even a second later is
stopped at the third; hence
$$\text{band width}_{NS}=10.0\ \text{s}=16.7\,\%\ \text{of the cycle}$$
For the east-west double-alternate system the corresponding window is
$$\text{band width}_{EW}=15.0\ \text{s}=25.0\,\%\ \text{of the cycle}$$
In general, for a matched alternate system with a 50 % split the band width is the
effective green divided by the group size, \(g/n\): 30 s for single alternate, 15 s
for double, 10 s for triple. This is the price of the wider grouping —
grouping signals lets a short block spacing tolerate a practical cycle, but each
step from single to double to triple alternate cuts the through band.
Interpret the band width. A 10 s band on the north-south
streets passes about 10 vehicles per lane per cycle at a 2 s saturation headway,
or roughly 600 vehicles per lane per hour, without a stop; the 15 s east-west band
passes about half again as many. Vehicles outside the band are stopped once and
then join the following band. Because the bands are narrow, this grid would be a
candidate for a computer-optimised offset plan
(maximising bandwidth directly, rather than imposing an alternate pattern), which
typically recovers a few more seconds of band on unequal spacings such as
these.
Time–space diagram for the north-south streets (150 m spacing, triple-alternate, C = 60 s). Green bars show each signal's green period, red bars the red. Signals S1–S3 share one indication and S4–S6 the opposite, alternating every three signals. The shaded parallelogram is the through band: its width, 10.0 s, is the interval during which a platoon can leave S1 and clear all seven signals at 54.0 km/h.
Time–space diagram for the east-west streets (200 m spacing, double-alternate, C = 60 s). Signals alternate in pairs, giving a wider through band of 15.0 s — 25 % of the cycle against 16.7 % for the triple-alternate case — at a progression speed of 48.0 km/h.