Question 2 of 7: Moving-Vehicle (Wardrop) Volume and Travel-Time Study
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2016 — 98-Civ-B10 Traffic Engineering. Three-hour duration; OPEN BOOK, any non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven questions, all of equal value (20 marks each), with the mark split printed in the paper’s own grading scheme: Q1 and Q2 and Q5 are (a) to (e) at 4 marks each, Q3 and Q4 are single 20-mark questions, Q6 is (a) 6 marks with (b) and (c) 7 marks each, and Q7 is (a) to (h) at 2.5 marks each. The paper states that a total of five solutions is required and that only the first five in the answer book will be marked. All seven questions are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than a sitting. The paper also permits assumptions — “Any data required, but not given, can be assumed” — and every assumption made below is stated explicitly where it is used.
Reference texts. Garber, N. J. & Hoel, L. A., Traffic and Highway Engineering, 5th ed. (Cengage) — the core reference for this exam code; Transportation Association of Canada, Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads (TAC GDG); Institute of Transportation Engineers (Canadian District), Canadian Capacity Guide for Signalized Intersections, 3rd ed.; Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) — pedestrian crossing-time model; AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (the “Green Book”, 2001 edition — the source of the stopping-sight-distance table printed on page 4 of this paper); Transportation Association of Canada, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Canada (MUTCDC). Canadian practice governs wherever the paper does not name a specific standard.
Question 2: Moving-Vehicle (Wardrop) Volume and Travel-Time Study (20 marks — 4 each)
Given. Sixteen test-vehicle runs over the same section — eight eastbound and eight westbound — each recording the run time, the number of vehicles met travelling in the opposite direction, the number of vehicles that overtook the test vehicle, and the number the test vehicle overtook.
Moving-vehicle field sheet (as printed on the paper)
Run
Travel time (min)
Vehicles met in opposite direction
Vehicles that overtook the test vehicle
Vehicles overtaken by the test vehicle
Eastbound
1
2.71
100
3
2
2
2.50
95
2
1
3
2.81
110
3
2
4
2.63
97
0
1
5
3.10
108
2
1
6
3.13
103
2
1
7
2.93
116
3
2
8
2.83
99
1
2
Westbound
1
2.95
97
1
2
2
3.13
115
2
1
3
3.23
113
3
2
4
2.85
99
0
1
5
3.07
95
2
1
6
2.72
111
2
1
7
3.25
117
1
0
8
3.04
109
1
2
Find. The run averages for each direction, then the eastbound and westbound flows in vehicles per hour and the mean travel time of each stream in minutes.
Wardrop moving-observer method. The volume of one stream is estimated from a run made WITH that stream (which supplies the overtaking counts) and a run made AGAINST it (which supplies the meeting count).
Approach. Average the eight runs in each direction, then apply Wardrop’s moving-observer relations, taking the opposite-direction run as the source of the meeting count and the same-direction run as the source of the overtaking counts.
Part (a) — average the eight runs in each direction. Each column is a simple arithmetic mean of eight observations, e.g. for the eastbound travel time $$\bar{t}_E = \frac{2.71+2.50+2.81+2.63+3.10+3.13+2.93+2.83}{8} = \frac{22.64}{8} = 2.83\ \text{min}$$ and the same operation on the remaining three columns gives the table below.
Tabulate the averages that feed the formulas. Writing $M$ for the mean number of vehicles met in the opposite direction, $O$ for the mean number that overtook the test vehicle and $P$ for the mean number the test vehicle overtook:
Part (a) — run averages
Direction of test run
$\bar{t}$ (min)
$M$ (veh)
$O$ (veh)
$P$ (veh)
Eastbound
2.83
103.5
2.00
1.50
Westbound
3.03
107.0
1.50
1.25
State Wardrop’s relations. For the stream being measured, let the subscript $w$ denote the test run made with that stream and $a$ the run made against it. The flow and the mean travel time of the stream are$$q = \frac{M_a + O_w - P_w}{t_a + t_w}, \qquad \bar{t} = t_w - \frac{O_w - P_w}{q}$$The meeting count must come from the against run, because only on that run do the vehicles of the measured stream travel in the opposite direction to the observer.
Part (b) — eastbound flow. The eastbound stream is met during the westbound runs, so $M_a = 107.0$, while the overtaking counts come from the eastbound runs, $O_w = 2.00$ and $P_w = 1.50$, with $t_a = 3.03$ min and $t_w = 2.83$ min:$$q_E = \frac{107.0 + 2.00 - 1.50}{3.03 + 2.83} = \frac{107.5}{5.86} = 18.345\ \text{veh/min}$$Converting to an hourly rate, $q_E = 18.345 \times 60$, so$$\boxed{q_E = 1{,}101\ \text{veh/h}}$$
Part (c) — westbound flow. The roles reverse: the westbound stream is met during the eastbound runs, so $M_a = 103.5$, and the overtaking counts are the westbound ones, $O_w = 1.50$ and $P_w = 1.25$, with $t_a = 2.83$ min and $t_w = 3.03$ min:$$q_W = \frac{103.5 + 1.50 - 1.25}{2.83 + 3.03} = \frac{103.75}{5.86} = 17.705\ \text{veh/min}$$and therefore$$\boxed{q_W = 1{,}062\ \text{veh/h}}$$
Part (d) — mean eastbound travel time. The test vehicle was net-overtaken eastbound ($O_w - P_w = 0.50 > 0$), which means it ran slightly slower than the stream, so the stream mean must be a little below the test-run mean:$$\bar{t}_E = 2.83 - \frac{2.00 - 1.50}{18.345} = 2.83 - 0.027 = \boxed{2.80\ \text{min}}$$
Part (e) — mean westbound travel time. Identically, with $O_w - P_w = 0.25$ and $q_W = 17.705$ veh/min,$$\bar{t}_W = 3.03 - \frac{1.50 - 1.25}{17.705} = 3.03 - 0.014 = \boxed{3.02\ \text{min}}$$In both directions the correction is small, which is the expected result when the test driver has been instructed to float with the stream.
The two directions are close to balanced, with the eastbound stream about 4 per cent heavier and about 7 per cent quicker over the section. If the test section length were known, dividing it by these mean travel times would give the space mean speed of each stream directly, which is the quantity the moving-vehicle method is normally run to obtain.