Question 4 of 7: Stopping Sight Distance and Crest Vertical Curves
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, May 2016 — 98-Civ-B10 Traffic Engineering. Three-hour duration; OPEN BOOK, any non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven questions, all of equal value (20 marks each) with the mark split printed in the paper's own grading scheme; the paper states that a total of five solutions is required and that only the first five in the answer book will be marked. All seven questions are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than a sitting. The paper also permits assumptions: “Any data required, but not given, can be assumed” — every assumption made below is stated explicitly where it is used.
Reference texts. Garber, N. J. & Hoel, L. A., Traffic and Highway Engineering, 5th ed. (Cengage) — the core reference for this exam code; Transportation Association of Canada, Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads (TAC GDG); AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (the “Green Book”, 2001 edition — the source of the sight-distance table printed on this paper); Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (HCM); Transportation Association of Canada, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Canada (MUTCDC). Canadian practice governs wherever the paper does not name a specific standard.
Question 4: Stopping Sight Distance and Crest Vertical Curves (20 marks — (a) 4, (b) and (c) 8 each)
Given. The paper's own AASHTO 2001 metric table (reproduced verbatim), plus the two curve geometries.
AASHTO 2001 stopping sight distance, metric — as printed on the paper ($t = 2.5$ s, $a = 3.4\ \text{m/s}^{2}$)
Design speed (km/h)
Brake reaction distance (m)
Braking distance on level (m)
Calculated SSD (m)
Design SSD (m)
20
13.9
4.6
18.5
20
30
20.9
10.3
31.2
35
40
27.8
18.4
46.2
50
50
34.8
28.7
63.5
65
60
41.7
41.3
83.0
85
70
48.7
56.2
104.9
105
80
55.6
73.4
129.0
130
90
62.6
92.9
155.5
160
100
69.5
114.7
184.2
185
110
76.5
138.8
215.3
220
120
83.4
165.2
248.6
250
130
90.4
193.8
284.2
285
Case
Entering grade $g_{1}$
Departing grade $g_{2}$
$A = |g_{1}-g_{2}|$
Driver eye $h_{1}$
Object $h_{2}$
Known
(b)
$+2.5\ \%$
$-3.5\ \%$
$6.0\ \%$
1070 mm
1295 mm (wildlife)
$V = 100$ km/h; find $L$
(c)
$+4\ \%$
$-2\ \%$
$6.0\ \%$
1080 mm
600 mm (standard)
$L = 150$ m; find $V$
Find. (a) definitions; (b) the minimum crest length $L$ that delivers the design stopping sight distance for a 100 km/h design speed with a raised object height; (c) the design speed that a given 150 m crest can safely serve.
Figure 4.1 — Part (b). The controlling sight line runs from the driver's eye at 1070 mm to the 1295 mm wildlife target and just grazes the pavement at the crest; because $S < L$ both ends of the sight line lie on the curve.
Approach. Read the required stopping sight distance off the paper's own table, then apply the crest-curve sight-distance relation in the branch that is self-consistent ($S < L$ or $S > L$). Part (c) inverts the same relation for $S$ and then inverts the AASHTO stopping-sight-distance equation for the speed.
Part (a) — Definitions.Perception–reaction time (often expanded as the PIEV process: perception, intellection, emotion, volition) is the interval between the moment a hazard first becomes visible and the moment the driver's foot begins to develop braking force. Nothing is decelerating during it, so the vehicle covers the full brake reaction distance $d_{1} = 0.278\,V t$ at the initial speed. AASHTO adopts $t = 2.5$ s for design, a value near the 90th percentile of measured driver response for an expected event; emergency-response studies give a median nearer 1.5 s, and the design value deliberately carries the slower drivers. Braking distance is the distance covered while the vehicle decelerates from the initial speed to a stop, obtained from the work–energy principle: the kinetic energy $\tfrac{1}{2}mv^{2}$ is dissipated by the resisting force over the stopping distance, giving $d_{2} = V^{2}/[254(f \pm G)]$ in metric units, or, in the deceleration form AASHTO now prefers, $d_{2} = 0.039V^{2}/a$. Their sum is the stopping sight distance, and the split matters: at 100 km/h reaction accounts for 69.5 m and braking 114.7 m of the 184.2 m total, so a design that skimps on reaction time loses over a third of the safety margin.
Part (b) — Required sight distance and rate of vertical curvature. From the paper's table at $V = 100$ km/h the design stopping sight distance is $S = 185$ m (the calculated value is 184.2 m). The algebraic difference in grades for this crest is
$$A = |g_{1} - g_{2}| = |{+2.5} - ({-3.5})| = 6.0\ \%$$
Assuming the sight distance is shorter than the curve, the crest sight-distance relation is
$$L = \frac{A\,S^{2}}{100\left(\sqrt{2h_{1}} + \sqrt{2h_{2}}\right)^{2}}$$
Evaluating the height term with $h_{1} = 1.070$ m and $h_{2} = 1.295$ m,
$$\sqrt{2(1.070)} = 1.4629, \qquad \sqrt{2(1.295)} = 1.6094$$
$$100\left(1.4629 + 1.6094\right)^{2} = 100(3.0722)^{2} = 943.85$$
Part (b), continued — minimum curve length. Substituting,
$$L = \frac{6.0 \times 185^{2}}{943.85} = \frac{205\,350}{943.85} = \boxed{217.6\ \text{m}}$$
The assumption must now be checked: $S = 185\ \text{m} \lt L = 217.6\ \text{m}$, so the $S \lt L$ branch was the right one. Testing the alternative branch confirms it — $L = 2S - 200(\sqrt{h_{1}}+\sqrt{h_{2}})^{2}/A = 370 - 157.3 = 212.7$ m, which is greater than $S = 185$ m and therefore violates its own premise. Expressed as a rate of vertical curvature the answer is $K = L/A = 217.6/6.0 = 36.3$ m per per-cent, against the AASHTO $K = 105$ for a standard 600 mm object at 100 km/h; the raised 1295 mm target is what makes this curve so much shorter. Had the calculated 184.2 m been used instead of the 185 m design value, $L$ would be 215.7 m — a 0.9 per cent difference, so rounding up to a constructed $L = 220$ m covers either reading.
Part (c) — Sight distance available on the given 150 m curve. Here $L$ is known and $S$ is the unknown, with standard heights $h_{1} = 1.080$ m and $h_{2} = 0.600$ m and
$$A = |{+4} - ({-2})| = 6.0\ \%$$
The height term is now
$$100\left(\sqrt{2(1.080)} + \sqrt{2(0.600)}\right)^{2} = 100(1.4697 + 1.0954)^{2} = 658.0$$
Rearranging the same relation for $S$,
$$S = \sqrt{\frac{100\,L\left(\sqrt{2h_{1}}+\sqrt{2h_{2}}\right)^{2}}{A}} = \sqrt{\frac{150 \times 658.0}{6.0}} = \sqrt{16\,450} = \boxed{128.3\ \text{m}}$$
Again $S = 128.3\ \text{m} \lt L = 150\ \text{m}$, so the branch is consistent.
Part (c), continued — design speed. Inverting the AASHTO metric stopping-sight-distance equation with $t = 2.5$ s and $a = 3.4\ \text{m/s}^{2}$,
$$S = 0.278\,V t + \frac{0.039\,V^{2}}{a} \;\Longrightarrow\; 0.011471\,V^{2} + 0.695\,V - 128.3 = 0$$
$$V = \frac{-0.695 + \sqrt{0.695^{2} + 4(0.011471)(128.3)}}{2(0.011471)} = \boxed{79.7\ \text{km/h}}$$
so the curve serves a design speed of essentially 80 km/h. Reading the table directly gives the same picture: 128.3 m of available sight distance lies just below the 130 m design value tabulated at 80 km/h and comfortably above the 105 m required at 70 km/h.
Check — two assumptions are stated under the paper's own Note 1. (i) The grades in part (b) are read as $+2.5\ \%$ entering and $-3.5\ \%$ departing, since the question specifies a crest; the algebraic difference $A = 6.0\ \%$ follows. (ii) In part (c) the design speed is quoted as the computed 79.7 km/h, rounded to the 80 km/h design increment. A designer holding strictly to the tabulated 130 m design SSD at 80 km/h would require $L = 154.1$ m, so the 150 m curve is 2.7 per cent short of that value; if no rounding tolerance is allowed the posted design speed drops to the next increment, 70 km/h. Both readings are defensible and the 2.7 per cent shortfall should be flagged to the designer rather than absorbed silently.
Figure 4.2 — Part (c). The same relation run backwards: with $L = 150$ m and standard 1080 mm / 600 mm heights the crest delivers $S = 128.3$ m, which corresponds to a design speed of about 80 km/h.