NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2015

Question 3 of 7: Composite Steel–Concrete Warehouse Floor

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design, National Exams December 2015 — 3 hours, closed book (textbooks and design handbooks permitted). Seven design questions of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here. Page 1 carries the design data and the mark split; pages 2–3 the question text.

Design data (page 1). Design in SI. Concrete f'c = 30 MPa; structural steel Fy = 350 MPa; rebar fy = 400 MPa. Prestressed work: f'ci = 35 MPa at transfer, f'c = 50 MPa, n = 6, fult = 1750 MPa, fy = 1450 MPa, finitial = 1200 MPa, losses 240 MPa. Marks: Q1 (12+5+3), Q2 (10+5+5), Q3 (15+5), Q4 (16+4), Q5 (14+6), Q6 (10+5+5), Q7 (6+5+5+4).

Reference texts. CSA S16:19 Design of Steel Structures; CISC Handbook of Steel Construction, 12th ed.; CSA A23.3:19 Design of Concrete Structures; Collins & Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures; Kulak & Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel, 10th ed.; MacGregor & Bartlett, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design (Canadian ed.); Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. (plastic analysis, Ch. 18).

Check — load factors. Page 1 states only that “all loads shown are unfactored” and gives no dead/live split. Throughout this paper a single factor of 1.5 is applied to every load printed on Figures 1–4, and 1.25 to any self weight the solver introduces (girder, slab, concrete member). Collapse mechanisms, section classifications and interaction ratios are unaffected by that choice; only the magnitudes scale. A candidate who assumes 1.25D + 1.5L with a stated split will land within a few per cent of the numbers below.

Check — section properties. Every rolled W-shape is modelled from its nominal plate dimensions (d, bf, tf, w), ignoring the root fillets. This is conservative by roughly 2 % of area and keeps every quoted property reproducible without a handbook.



Question 3: Composite Steel–Concrete Warehouse Floor (15 + 5 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Beam span (design span)14 000 mm
Beam spacing2500 mm (0.75 m edge cantilevers)
Slab150 mm reinforced concrete, f'c = 30 MPa
Live load16 kPa
Superimposed dead1.0 kPa (finishes, services)
SteelFy = 350 MPa
Constructionunshored; beams laterally braced

Find. (a) a steel section acting compositely with the slab that satisfies the factored moment, the construction-stage moment and deflection; (b) the number of headed studs.

150 mm slab0.752.5 m2.5 m2.5 m0.759 mDesign span 14 m; design live load 16 kPa; four beams at 2.5 m centresInterior beam: b_eff = min(L/4, s) = 2500 mm
Figure 3 — warehouse floor cross-section.

Approach. Take the interior beam as the critical one, establish the effective slab width, size the section on the fully plastic composite resistance, then check the bare steel beam under wet concrete and finish with the horizontal shear to be transferred.

  1. Part (a) — assemble the loads on an interior beam. Over a 2.5 m tributary width the slab contributes $0.15 \times 24 = 3.6$ kPa and the superimposed dead 1.0 kPa; adding 1.25 kN/m for the beam itself, $w_D = 12.75$ kN/m and $w_L = 16 \times 2.5 = 40$ kN/m. Hence $$w_f = 1.25(12.75) + 1.5(40) = 75.9\ \text{kN/m}, \qquad \boxed{M_f = \frac{w_f L^2}{8} = 1860\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}, \quad V_f = 532\ \text{kN}}$$
  2. Determine the effective slab width. Clause 17.4.1 takes the least of a quarter of the span and the beam spacing: $$b_{\text{eff}} = \min(14\,000/4,\ 2500) = 2500\ \text{mm}$$ so the full tributary width is effective — the beams are close enough that shear lag does not bite. (The edge beams, at $0.75 + 1.25 = 2.0$ m, are lighter loaded and are covered by the interior design.)
  3. Size the composite section. Try W610 × 125 ($A = 15\,793$ mm2, $d = 612$ mm, modelled from nominal plate dimensions). The steel can deliver $$T_r = \phi A F_y = 0.9(15\,793)(350) = 4975\ \text{kN}$$ while the slab in compression can deliver $C_r = 0.85\phi_c f'_c b_{\text{eff}} t = 6216$ kN. Since $T_r < C_r$ the plastic neutral axis lies inside the slab, at $$a = \frac{T_r}{0.85\phi_c f'_c b_{\text{eff}}} = 120.1\ \text{mm} \;<\; 150\ \text{mm}$$ Taking moments about the centre of the concrete block, $$M_r = T_r\left(\frac{d}{2} + t - \frac{a}{2}\right) = 4975\times10^3(306 + 150 - 60.0) = \boxed{1970\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ against $M_f = 1860$ kN·m — a utilisation of 0.94.
  4. Check the construction stage. Unshored means the bare steel beam alone carries the wet concrete. With $w = 1.25(9.0 + 1.25) + 1.5(0.5 \times 2.5) = 14.7$ kN/m the construction moment is 360 kN·m, against the bare-steel resistance $\phi Z_x F_y = 1145$ kN·m. The section is Class 1 in that condition ($b/t = 5.84 \le 7.75$; $h/w = 48.1 \le 58.8$), so the plastic modulus is available and the check passes with a factor of three. Web shear, $V_r = \phi(0.66F_y)dw = 1514$ kN, dwarfs the 532 kN.
  5. Check deflection. With $E_c = 4500\sqrt{30} = 24\,648$ MPa and $n = 8.11$, the transformed slab width is $2500/8.11 = 308$ mm and the composite second moment of area is $I_{tr} = 2770 \times 10^6$ mm4. The live-load deflection is $$\Delta_L = \frac{5w_LL^4}{384EI_{tr}} = 36.1\ \text{mm} = \frac{L}{388} \;\le\; \frac{L}{360} = 38.9\ \text{mm}$$ The bare steel deflects 26 mm under the wet slab, so specify that camber.
  6. Part (b) — horizontal shear to be transferred. With full interaction the connectors between the support and the point of maximum moment must transfer the smaller of the two forces computed in step 3, $V_h = 4975$ kN.
  7. Size and count the studs. For a 19 mm headed stud, $A_{sc} = 283.5$ mm2, Clause 17.7.2.1 gives $$q_r = 0.5\phi_{sc}A_{sc}\sqrt{f'_c E_c} = 97.5\ \text{kN} \quad\left(\le \phi_{sc}A_{sc}F_u = 102\ \text{kN}\right)$$ so $$n = \frac{V_h}{q_r} = \frac{4975}{97.5} = 51.0 \;\rightarrow\; \boxed{52\ \text{studs per half span, i.e. 104 per beam}}$$ Place them as 26 pairs at 269 mm centres over each half span. Two studs fit across the 229 mm flange (transverse spacing 4d = 76 mm minimum), the longitudinal spacing exceeds the 6d = 114 mm minimum, and 269 mm is well below the 8t = 1200 mm maximum.
b_eff = 2500150 mm slabW610 x 12519 mm studs, 26 pairs per half spana = 120Full-interaction composite section; the plastic neutral axis lies inside the slab
Composite section of the interior beam, with the stud layout.

Final Results

ItemValueCheck
Effective width2500 mmCl 17.4.1
Steel sectionW610 × 125Class 1 bare
Composite Mr1970 kN·m (a = 120 mm in slab)Mf = 1860 — 0.94 OK
Construction stageMf = 360 vs Mr = 1145 kN·mOK
Live-load deflection36.1 mm = L/388≤ L/360 OK
Camber26 mmbare-steel dead deflection
Shear connectorsqr = 97.5 kN; 104 studs per beam26 pairs at 269 mm each half