Question 5 of 7: Reinforced-Concrete Design of Beam AB
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design, National Exams May 2016 — 3 hours, closed book (design handbooks permitted). Seven design questions of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper, and all seven are solved here.
Given. The same L-frame geometry and loading as Question 3, now to be built in reinforced concrete, so the analysis must be redone with concrete member stiffnesses and the beam self weight included.
Quantity
Value
Beam AB / column BC
8 m / 10 m, both ends built in
Factored loads
525 kN at mid-span, 750 kN at B, 150 kN at column mid-height
Materials
f'c = 30 MPa, fy = 400 MPa
Resistance factors
φc = 0.65, φs = 0.85
Stress-block factors
α1 = 0.805, β1 = 0.895
Trial section
450 mm wide × 900 mm deep, 40 mm cover, 10M stirrups
Find. (a) a rectangular beam section for AB with its flexural and shear reinforcement, and (b) the long-term mid-span deflection of that beam.
Approach. Re-analyse the frame elastically with cracked-section stiffnesses, because the concrete members have a quite different stiffness ratio from the steel ones and they carry their own weight. Design the three critical sections for the resulting moments, check shear at the support, then compute the immediate deflection with an effective moment of inertia and multiply the sustained part by the creep factor.
Part (a) — set up the concrete analysis. A 450 mm by 900 mm section gives $I_{g} = 450\times900^{3}/12 = 2.734\times10^{10}$ mm$^{4}$ and a self weight of $0.45\times0.90\times24 = 9.72$ kN/m, factored to 12.15 kN/m. A23.3 Cl 10.14.1.2 requires reduced stiffnesses for the analysis of a frame: $0.35I_{g}$ for the flexural member and $0.70I_{g}$ for the column. With $E_{c} = 3300\sqrt{30} + 6900 = 24\,975$ MPa this halves the beam stiffness relative to the column, which pushes moment towards the built-in end A.
Read off the design actions. The elastic analysis of the frame under the factored loads and the factored self weight returns $$M_{A} = -686.0,\quad M_{\text{mid}} = +594.1,\quad M_{B} = -420.1\ \text{kN.m}$$ with $V_{A} = 344.3$ kN and $V_{B} = 277.9$ kN (which sum to the total load of 622.2 kN, as they must). The column takes 1028 kN axially at B, rising to 1149 kN at the base once its own weight is added.
Fix the effective depth and the flexural relation. With 40 mm cover, 10M stirrups and 25M bars in one layer, $d = 900 - 40 - 11.3 - 12.6 = 836$ mm. The resistance of a singly reinforced rectangular section is $$M_{r} = \phi_{s}A_{s}f_{y}\left(d - \frac{a}{2}\right),\qquad a = \frac{\phi_{s}A_{s}f_{y}}{\alpha_{1}\phi_{c}f'_{c}b}$$ with $\alpha_{1}\phi_{c}f'_{c}b = 0.805\times0.65\times30\times450 = 7064$ N/mm.
Design the three critical sections. Solving the quadratic at each: $$M_{A} = 686\ \Rightarrow\ A_{s} = 2609\ \text{mm}^{2}\ \rightarrow\ \boxed{6\text{-}25\text{M top at A}}\ (3000\ \text{mm}^{2},\ M_{r} = 779\ \text{kN.m})$$ $$M_{\text{mid}} = 594\ \Rightarrow\ A_{s} = 2234\ \text{mm}^{2}\ \rightarrow\ 5\text{-}25\text{M bottom}\ (2500\ \text{mm}^{2},\ M_{r} = 660\ \text{kN.m})$$ $$M_{B} = 420\ \Rightarrow\ A_{s} = 1547\ \text{mm}^{2}\ \rightarrow\ 4\text{-}25\text{M top at B}\ (2000\ \text{mm}^{2},\ M_{r} = 536\ \text{kN.m})$$ All exceed the Cl 10.5.1.2 minimum of $0.2\sqrt{f'_{c}}b_{t}h/f_{y} = 1109$ mm$^{2}$, and the deepest stress block gives $c/d = 0.193$, comfortably tension controlled.
Check that the section is not over-reinforced. The largest steel ratio is $\rho = 3000/(450\times836) = 0.0080$, which puts the neutral axis at $c = 161$ mm and the steel strain at $(836-161)/161\times0.0035 = 0.0147$, seven times yield. The section will warn before it fails, which is the intent of the ultimate strength method.
Design the shear reinforcement. Take $d_{v} = \max(0.9d,\ 0.72h) = 752$ mm, so the design shear at $d_{v}$ from A is $344.3 - 12.15\times0.752 = 335.2$ kN. With minimum stirrups present the simplified method gives $\beta = 0.18$ and $\theta = 35^{\circ}$: $$V_{c} = \phi_{c}\lambda\beta\sqrt{f'_{c}}b_{w}d_{v} = 0.65(0.18)\sqrt{30}(450)(752)\times10^{-3} = 217.0\ \text{kN}$$ leaving $V_{s} = 118.2$ kN for the stirrups. Two-leg 10M ties ($A_{v} = 200$ mm$^{2}$) would allow 618 mm spacing on strength, but Cl 11.3.8.1 caps it at $0.7d_{v} = 527$ mm, so use $$\boxed{10\text{M closed stirrups at 400 mm centres throughout}}$$ giving $V_{r} = 217.0 + 183.0 = 400$ kN and a utilisation of 0.84.
Part (b) — find the cracked and effective stiffnesses. With $n = E_{s}/E_{c} = 8.01$ and 2500 mm$^{2}$ at mid-span, the cracked neutral axis solves $b(kd)^{2}/2 = nA_{s}(d - kd)$ to give $kd = 232$ mm, hence $$I_{cr} = \frac{b(kd)^{3}}{3} + nA_{s}(d - kd)^{2} = 9.18\times10^{9}\ \text{mm}^{4}$$ The cracking moment is $M_{cr} = f_{r}I_{g}/y_{t}$ with $f_{r} = 0.6\lambda\sqrt{f'_{c}} = 3.29$ MPa, giving 199.6 kN.m, and the service mid-span moment from the same frame analysis at unfactored loads is 413.7 kN.m. Branson's expression then gives $$I_{e} = I_{cr} + (I_{g} - I_{cr})\left(\frac{M_{cr}}{M_{a}}\right)^{3} = 1.122\times10^{10}\ \text{mm}^{4} = 0.41I_{g}$$
Compute the immediate deflection. Re-running the frame at service load with $E_{c}I_{e}$ on the beam gives a mid-span deflection of 4.83 mm downwards. The built-in end at A and the partial restraint from the column at B between them remove most of the simple-span deflection, which for the same load on a simply supported beam would be about six times larger.
Apply the creep multiplier. A23.3 Cl 9.8.2.5 gives the additional long-term deflection as $\zeta = s/(1 + 50\rho')$ times the immediate deflection of the sustained load. With $s = 2.0$ for five years or more and compression steel $A'_{s} = 1000$ mm$^{2}$ ($\rho' = 0.00266$), $\zeta = 2.0/1.133 = 1.765$, so $$\Delta_{LT} = \Delta_{i}(1 + \zeta) = 4.83\times2.765 = \boxed{13.4\ \text{mm}} = L/599$$ which is inside the $L/480$ limit of Table 9.3 for members supporting non-sensitive construction.
Reinforcement for beam AB. The hogging steel at A is the largest because the built-in end attracts more moment than the corner at B, which the column can rotate away from.
Check — sustained fraction. Page 1 gives no dead/live split, so every load has been treated as sustained, which is the conservative bound for creep. If instead only the self weight and the 500 kN joint load were sustained, the creep multiplier would apply to a smaller immediate deflection and the long-term value would fall to about 9 mm; the reported 13.4 mm is therefore an upper bound, and the deflection limit is satisfied either way.