Question 9 of 10: Stability of a cantilever retaining wall against overturning and sliding
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, May 2013 — 98-Civ-B3 Geotechnical Design. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator. Section A holds five 7-mark questions (answer any four); Section B holds the long 24-mark design questions (answer any three). Candidates are asked to identify the source of every design chart and assumed value used. Every question is answered here, because the set is a study resource rather than a sitting.
Reference texts. B. M. Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering (9th ed.) and Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.); Canadian Geotechnical Society, Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM, 4th ed.) — the governing Canadian reference for foundation practice; D. P. Coduto, Foundation Design: Principles and Practices; R. F. Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics.
Note on the question numbering. The printed paper numbers two different Section B questions as “Question 9” — the retaining wall on page 5 and the drilled pier on pages 5–6 — and its Section B heading says “any three of the following four questions” while five questions are actually printed. The drilled-pier question is treated here as Question 10 so that every printed question has a unique number; no wording has been changed.
Question 9: Stability of a cantilever retaining wall against overturning and sliding (24 marks)
Given. A cantilever wall 11.0 m high overall on a 9.0 m base. The base slab is 1.0 m thick, the toe projects 1.5 m and the heel 6.0 m, and the stem is 10.0 m tall, 1.5 m thick at its foot and 0.5 m at the top with the back face vertical and the front face battered. Soil 1 is the backfill behind the wall, horizontal at the level of the top of the stem; Soil 2 is the natural ground, which founds the base and covers the toe to a depth of 1.5 m below its own surface. No water table is shown, so the backfill is taken as fully drained.
Material properties
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Soil 1 (backfill)
$\gamma,\ \phi',\ c'$
20 kN/m$^3$, $36^{\circ}$, 5 kPa
Soil 2 (foundation and toe cover)
$\gamma,\ \phi',\ c'$
18 kN/m$^3$, $30^{\circ}$, 10 kPa
Concrete
$\gamma_c$
24 kN/m$^3$
Wall height / base width
$H,\ B$
11.0 m / 9.0 m
Toe / stem base / heel
—
1.5 m / 1.5 m / 6.0 m
Base thickness / stem top
—
1.0 m / 0.5 m
Find. The factor of safety against overturning about the toe and against sliding along the base.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure 4 (redrawn). Cantilever retaining wall, the vertical plane through the heel on which the Rankine active thrust acts, and the principal dimensions. See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Take a vertical plane through the heel, apply the Rankine active thrust of Soil 1 on it, and treat everything to the left of that plane — concrete plus the backfill sitting on the heel — as the resisting body. Overturning is then a moment ratio about the front bottom edge of the toe, and sliding a ratio of base friction and adhesion, plus the passive resistance of the soil covering the toe, to the horizontal thrust.
Compute the Rankine active pressure on the vertical plane through the heel. With horizontal backfill, $$\begin{aligned}K_{a1} &= \tan^2\!\left(45^{\circ} - \frac{36^{\circ}}{2}\right) = \tan^2 27^{\circ} = 0.2596 \\ \sqrt{K_{a1}} &= 0.5095\end{aligned}$$Because the backfill has a cohesion intercept, the active pressure is $$\sigma'_a(z) = K_{a1}\gamma_1 z - 2c'_1\sqrt{K_{a1}}$$which is negative near the surface and reaches $\sigma'_a(11) = 0.2596(20)(11) - 2(5)(0.5095) = 52.02$ kPa at the base.
Allow for the tension crack and resolve the thrust. Soil cannot sustain the tensile pressure, so the diagram is truncated at the depth where it changes sign: $$z_0 = \frac{2c'_1}{\gamma_1\sqrt{K_{a1}}} = \frac{2(5)}{20(0.5095)} = 0.981\ \text{m}$$Ignoring the tensile block entirely, which is the conservative and usual assumption, leaves a triangle of height $H - z_0 = 10.019$ m: $$\begin{aligned}P_a &= \tfrac{1}{2}(52.02)(10.019) = 260.6\ \text{kN/m} \\ \bar{y} &= \frac{H-z_0}{3} = 3.340\ \text{m above the base}\end{aligned}$$Retaining the negative area would give 258.1 kN/m, only one per cent less, so the choice is not critical here.
Assemble the vertical forces and their moments about the toe. The resisting body is the concrete plus the backfill standing on the heel; the 0.5 m of Soil 2 covering the toe is included as a small extra. Moment arms are measured from the front bottom edge of the base.
Vertical forces and their moments about the toe
Component
Area (m2)
Unit weight (kN/m3)
W (kN/m)
Arm from toe (m)
Moment (kN·m/m)
Stem — rectangular part
5.000
24.0
120.00
2.7500
330.00
Stem — battered (triangular) part
5.000
24.0
120.00
2.1667
260.00
Base slab
9.000
24.0
216.00
4.5000
972.00
Backfill (Soil 1) over the heel
60.000
20.0
1200.00
6.0000
7200.00
Soil 2 cover over the toe
0.750
18.0
13.50
0.7500
10.12
Sums
1669.50
—
8772.12
Factor of safety against overturning. The overturning moment is the active thrust times its lever arm about the same point: $$M_O = P_a \bar{y} = 260.6(3.340) = 870.2\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m/m}$$so $$FS_{overturning} = \frac{\sum M_R}{M_O} = \frac{8772}{870.2} = \boxed{10.08}$$This is far above the usual minimum of 2.0, and the reason is plain from the table: the 6 m heel carries 1200 kN/m of backfill acting at a lever arm of 6.0 m, which alone supplies 82 per cent of the resisting moment. The wall is heel-dominated.
Passive resistance in front of the toe. The toe is buried 1.5 m in Soil 2, so $$K_{p2} = \tan^2\!\left(45^{\circ} + \frac{30^{\circ}}{2}\right) = \tan^2 60^{\circ} = 3.0$$$$P_p = \tfrac{1}{2}K_{p2}\gamma_2 D^2 + 2c'_2\sqrt{K_{p2}}\,D = \tfrac{1}{2}(3.0)(18)(1.5^2) + 2(10)(1.7321)(1.5) = 112.7\ \text{kN/m}$$
Factor of safety against sliding. Base friction and adhesion are mobilized against the foundation soil, and the customary practice is to take only two thirds of its strength on a cast-against-soil concrete base: $$FS_{sliding} = \frac{V\tan\!\left(\tfrac{2}{3}\phi'_2\right) + B\left(\tfrac{2}{3}c'_2\right) + P_p}{P_a}$$Substituting $V = 1669.5$ kN/m, $\tan(20^{\circ}) = 0.36397$ and $B = 9.0$ m: $$FS_{sliding} = \frac{607.6 + 60.0 + 112.7}{260.6} = \frac{780.4}{260.6} = \boxed{2.99}$$Neglecting the passive term altogether, as many designers do because the soil in front can be excavated for services, still leaves $FS = 2.56$, comfortably above the usual minimum of 1.5.
Check the resultant and the bearing pressure. The line of action of the resultant crosses the base at $$\bar{x} = \frac{\sum M_R - M_O}{V} = \frac{8772 - 870.2}{1669.5} = 4.733\ \text{m from the toe}$$so the eccentricity is $e = \bar{x} - B/2 = 0.233$ m, that is 0.233 m towards the heel. It is well inside the middle third ($B/6 = 1.5$ m), so the whole base stays in compression, with $$\begin{aligned}q_{toe} &= \frac{V}{B}\left(1 - \frac{6e}{B}\right) = 156.7\ \text{kPa} \\ q_{heel} &= \frac{V}{B}\left(1 + \frac{6e}{B}\right) = 214.3\ \text{kPa}\end{aligned}$$Both must be checked against the allowable bearing capacity of Soil 2, which is the third stability check the question does not ask for but a design would require.
Check — assumptions. Rankine active pressure on a vertical plane through the heel, with no wall friction on that plane (conservative). The tensile block above $z_0$ is discarded rather than credited. No water table is shown on Figure 4, so the backfill is assumed fully drained by a filter and weep holes; if the backfill were to become saturated to the top the thrust would roughly double and the sliding factor of safety would fall below 1.5. Two thirds of $\phi'_2$ and $c'_2$ are mobilized at the base, per Das; using full strength gives $FS_{sliding} = 4.48$. Surcharge on the backfill and seismic action are not considered.