Question 4 of 9: Plate load test in saturated clay — proof of size independence
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2017 — 16-Civ-B3 Geotechnical Design; three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator. Section A holds five discussion questions worth 7 marks each of which four are marked; Section B holds four design questions worth 24 marks each of which three are marked, so the examinable total is 4 × 7 + 3 × 24 = 100 marks. All nine questions are worked below, because the set is a study resource rather than a marked script.
Reference texts. B. M. Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering, 8th–9th ed. (Cengage); B. M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed.; R. F. Craig / J. Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics, 9th ed.; Canadian Geotechnical Society, Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM), 4th ed.; D. P. Coduto, Foundation Design: Principles and Practices; J. E. Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design; ASTM D1586 (SPT), D5778 (CPTu), D2573 (field vane).
Source of design charts and assumed values (page 1, Note 6). Rankine active and passive coefficients from Das, Principles of Foundation Engineering, Ch. 7 (Eqs. 7.11 and 7.30); cantilever-wall stability procedure from Das Ch. 8 (Eqs. 8.11–8.14). Drilled-shaft adhesion factor alpha* = 0.55 and the 1.5 m surface exclusion from Reese & O'Neill (1989), tabulated in Das Ch. 12; bearing factor Nc* = 9 from Skempton (1951); block-failure check from Das Ch. 11 (Eq. 11.55). Compression index from Skempton's Cc = 0.009(LL − 10). Strain-influence factors and the C1, C2 corrections from Schmertmann, Hartman & Brown (1978) as presented in Das Ch. 5; Es = 500(N60 + 15) kPa from Das Table 5.7 (Bowles). Friction angle from the SPT via Wolff (1989), phi' = 27.1 + 0.3(N1)60 − 0.00054[(N1)60]2, with the Liao & Whitman (1986) overburden correction; Vesic bearing-capacity, shape and depth factors from Das Tables 4.2 and 4.3. Every assumed value (unit weights of concrete, specific gravity for the void ratio, pile spacing, factors of safety) is stated in a callout beside the step that uses it.
Question 4: Plate load test in saturated clay — proof of size independence (7 marks)
Given. Terzaghi's equation $q_{ult}=cN_c+qN_q+0.5\gamma BN_\gamma$; a saturated clay loaded rapidly, so the response is undrained; a test plate of width $B_P$ and a prototype foundation of width $B_F$, both bearing on the same clay.
Find. Show that $q_{ult}$ contains no term in $B$ under undrained conditions, so that $(q_{ult})_P=(q_{ult})_F$ whatever the ratio $B_F/B_P$, and state the assumptions on which that result rests.
Approach. Evaluate Terzaghi's three bearing-capacity factors at the undrained friction angle $\phi_u=0$, then inspect which of the three terms can depend on the footing width.
Set the undrained strength parameters. A saturated clay sheared fast enough that no drainage occurs deforms at constant volume, so the total-stress envelope is horizontal: $$\phi_u = 0, \qquad c = c_u$$ This is the only physical input the proof needs; everything else is arithmetic on Terzaghi's factors.
Evaluate the surcharge factor. Terzaghi's $N_q=\dfrac{e^{2\left(3\pi/4-\phi'/2\right)\tan\phi'}}{2\cos^{2}\!\left(45^{\circ}+\phi'/2\right)}$. Substituting $\phi'=0$ makes the exponent zero, so the numerator is unity, while $\cos^{2}45^{\circ}=0.5$, giving $$N_q=\frac{1}{2(0.5)}=1$$
Evaluate the self-weight factor. $N_\gamma$ measures the contribution of the weight of the soil inside the failure wedge, and it is generated entirely by frictional resistance along the log-spiral. Vesic's closed form makes this explicit: $N_\gamma=2(N_q+1)\tan\phi'$, and with $\phi'=0$ the factor $\tan\phi'$ vanishes: $$N_\gamma = 2(1+1)\tan 0^{\circ} = \boxed{0}$$ Terzaghi's own tabulated $N_\gamma$ likewise goes to zero at $\phi'=0$. This is the pivot of the whole proof, because $N_\gamma$ is the only factor that multiplies $B$.
Evaluate the cohesion factor. Terzaghi's $N_c=(N_q-1)\cot\phi'$ is indeterminate at $\phi'=0$; taking the limit gives Prandtl's value $N_c=\pi+2=5.14$ for a smooth strip, and Terzaghi's rough-base strip value, which is the one tabulated with his equation, is $$N_c = 5.7$$ Either way it is a pure number, independent of $B$.
Assemble the equation. Substituting the three factors, $$q_{ult}=c_u(5.7)+q(1)+0.5\,\gamma B(0)=5.7\,c_u+\gamma D_f$$ and if the test and the foundation are both taken at the same founding level the surcharge $q=\gamma D_f$ is identical for the two, so $$\boxed{(q_{ult})_P=(q_{ult})_F=5.7\,c_u+\gamma D_f}$$ For a plate test at the ground surface, $D_f=0$ and $q_{ult}=5.7c_u$ exactly.
Read the result. Neither surviving term contains $B$. The width entered Terzaghi's equation only through the self-weight term, and that term is switched off by the absence of friction, so the ultimate bearing capacity of a 300 mm test plate and of a 3 m footing on the same saturated clay are numerically equal. Contrast this with a sand, where $\phi'$ is large, $N_\gamma$ is of order 30 to 80, and the same comparison would be meaningless.
Quantity
Value at phiu = 0
Depends on B?
Nq
1
no
Ngamma
0
term eliminated
Nc (Terzaghi, strip, rough base)
5.7 (Prandtl 5.14)
no
qult
5.7 cu + gamma Df
no
Conclusion
(qult)P = (qult)F for any BP, BF
Assumptions made, stated as the question requires. (1) The clay is fully saturated and is loaded quickly enough that no drainage occurs, so phiu = 0 and c = cu; a slow test, or a silty clay, would mobilise a frictional component and the proof fails. (2) The clay is homogeneous and its undrained strength is uniform over the influence depth of both the plate and the foundation — this is the practically important assumption, because a 300 mm plate samples only about 0.6 m of soil while a 3 m footing samples 6 m or more, and in a normally consolidated deposit where cu grows with depth the two will not read the same. (3) Both are founded at the same depth, so the gamma Df terms cancel; if the plate is tested at the bottom of a test pit at the design founding level this is satisfied. (4) Both have the same shape, or the same shape factor is applied to Nc (1.0 for a strip, 1.3 for a square or circle in Terzaghi's form). (5) General shear failure occurs in both. (6) The clay is intact, not fissured: in a fissured clay the mass strength falls as the loaded area grows, and a small plate over-reads. (7) The result applies to bearing capacity only. Settlement is strongly size dependent — for clay it scales roughly in proportion to B and for sand as [2BF/(BF + BP)]2 — so a plate load test must never be used to predict foundation settlement without that correction.