NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B5 Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment · May 2014

Question 4 of 5: Secondary Clarifier Sizing, Solids Loading and Sludge Age

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Civ-B5 Water Supply and Wastewater Engineering, National Examination, May 2014. Three hours; closed book with one aid sheet written on both sides; approved calculator permitted. Question 1 is compulsory and the candidate then attempts any three of Questions 2–5. Every question carries 25 marks, so the paper is marked out of 100. All five questions are solved below — the set is a study resource, not a three-hour sitting.

Reference texts.



Question 4: Secondary Clarifier Sizing, Solids Loading and Sludge Age (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Plant data as stated in the question
QuantitySymbolValue
Average plant flow$Q$15 000 m³/d
Number of circular secondary clarifiers$n$2
Design surface overflow rate at average flowSOR15 m³/m²·d
Mixed-liquor suspended solids in the aeration tank$X$3 000 mg/L
Return activated sludge flow$Q_R$10 000 m³/d
Aeration-tank volume$V$5 000 m³
Waste sludge flow$Q_W$150 m³/d
Waste sludge solids concentration$X_W$6 000 mg/L

Find. (a) the diameter of each of the two circular secondary clarifiers; (b) the solids loading rate imposed on them at average flow; (c) the solids retention time (sludge age) of the activated-sludge system.

influent Q = 15 000 m3/d Aeration tank V = 5 000 m3 X = 3 000 mg/L MLSS mixed liquor 25 000 m3/d Clarifier 1 — 25.2 m dia. Clarifier 2 — 25.2 m dia. effluent return activated sludge, QR = 10 000 m3/d waste sludge QW = 150 m3/d at XW = 6 000 mg/L
Figure 4.1 — Conventional activated-sludge flow schematic; the two clarifiers give a total surface area of 1 000 m² at a surface overflow rate of 15 m³/m²·d. The clarifiers receive the mixed liquor, that is the plant flow plus the return sludge, but the surface overflow rate is defined on the plant flow alone because only that flow passes upward over the weirs.

Approach. Part (a) is a direct application of the definition $\mathrm{SOR} = Q/A$ followed by the geometry of a circle. Part (b) is a solids mass balance across the clarifier inlet, and turns on recognising that the solids arrive with the mixed liquor, which includes the return flow, whereas the hydraulic overflow rate in part (a) does not. Part (c) is a solids mass balance over the whole system: the inventory of biomass divided by the rate at which biomass leaves.

  1. Part (a) — find the total clarifier surface area from the overflow rate. By definition the surface overflow rate is the plant flow divided by the plan area of the clarifiers, so $$A_{\text{total}} \;=\; \frac{Q}{\mathrm{SOR}} \;=\; \frac{15\,000\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}}{15\ \text{m}^3/\text{m}^2\!\cdot\!\text{d}} \;=\; 1\,000\ \text{m}^2$$ Only the plant flow $Q$ appears here. The return sludge is drawn off the clarifier floor and never crosses the effluent weirs, so it does not contribute to the upflow velocity that the overflow rate represents.
  2. Divide the area between the two units. The two clarifiers are identical and share the flow equally: $$A_{\text{each}} \;=\; \frac{A_{\text{total}}}{n} \;=\; \frac{1\,000}{2} \;=\; 500\ \text{m}^2$$
  3. Convert the area of one clarifier to a diameter. For a circular tank $A = \pi D^2/4$, so $$D \;=\; \sqrt{\frac{4A_{\text{each}}}{\pi}} \;=\; \sqrt{\frac{4 \times 500}{\pi}} \;=\; \sqrt{636.6}$$

    which gives

    $$\boxed{D \;=\; 25.2\ \text{m diameter, for each of the two clarifiers}}$$ Checking backwards, two tanks of 25.2 m give $2 \times \pi(25.2)^2/4 = 997.5$ m² and an overflow rate of $15\,000/997.5 = 15.04$ m³/m²·d, which is the design value to three figures. In construction the tank would be rounded up to the next standard mechanism size, typically 25.5 m, giving 1 021 m² and an overflow rate of 14.7 m³/m²·d — slightly conservative, which is the correct direction to round.
  4. Part (b) — establish the flow that actually carries solids to the clarifiers. The clarifier inlet receives the mixed liquor, which is the plant flow together with the returned sludge: $$Q_{\text{ML}} \;=\; Q + Q_R \;=\; 15\,000 + 10\,000 \;=\; 25\,000\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}$$ This corresponds to a return ratio $Q_R/Q = 0.67$, a normal value for a conventional plant.
  5. Compute the mass of solids applied per day. Both streams entering the clarifier carry mixed liquor at the aeration-tank concentration of 3 000 mg/L, or equivalently 3.0 kg/m³: $$M_{\text{solids}} \;=\; Q_{\text{ML}}\,X \;=\; 25\,000\ \text{m}^3/\text{d} \times 3.0\ \text{kg/m}^3 \;=\; 75\,000\ \text{kg/d}$$
  6. Divide by the clarifier surface area to obtain the solids loading rate. Using the total area of 1 000 m² found in step 1, $$\mathrm{SLR} \;=\; \frac{(Q + Q_R)\,X}{A_{\text{total}}} \;=\; \frac{75\,000}{1\,000} \;=\; \boxed{75\ \text{kg/m}^2\!\cdot\!\text{d}\ \ (3.1\ \text{kg/m}^2\!\cdot\!\text{h})}$$ This sits comfortably inside the usual design envelope for conventional activated sludge, which is about 4 to 6 kg/m²·h at average flow with a peak allowance of 8 kg/m²·h, so the clarifiers are thickening-limited well within their capacity. It is worth noting how differently the two loadings behave: the hydraulic loading including the return flow is $25\,000/1\,000 = 25$ m³/m²·d, well above the 15 m³/m²·d overflow rate, which is exactly why the two parameters must be checked separately.
  7. Part (c) — compute the mass of solids held in the system. The solids retention time is the inventory of biomass divided by the rate at which it is removed. Taking the aeration tank as the inventory, $$M_{\text{system}} \;=\; V\,X \;=\; 5\,000\ \text{m}^3 \times 3.0\ \text{kg/m}^3 \;=\; 15\,000\ \text{kg}$$
  8. Compute the rate at which solids leave the system. Solids leave deliberately with the waste sludge and unavoidably with the effluent. The question gives no effluent suspended-solids concentration, so the effluent term is taken as negligible — a reasonable assumption for a well-operated plant, where it accounts for only a few per cent of the total: $$M_{\text{out}} \;=\; Q_W\,X_W \;=\; 150\ \text{m}^3/\text{d} \times 6.0\ \text{kg/m}^3 \;=\; 900\ \text{kg/d}$$
  9. Divide to obtain the solids retention time. Assembling the two, $$\mathrm{SRT} \;=\; \frac{V X}{Q_W X_W + Q_e X_e} \;\approx\; \frac{15\,000\ \text{kg}}{900\ \text{kg/d}} \;=\; \boxed{16.7\ \text{d}}$$ The result is entirely consistent with the plant description. A sludge age of about 17 days is well above the four to five days a conventional plant needs for carbon removal alone, and above the roughly 10 to 15 days that year-round nitrification requires at Canadian winter mixed-liquor temperatures, so this plant should nitrify reliably. The corresponding hydraulic retention time is only $5\,000/15\,000 \times 24 = 8.0$ hours, and the ratio of the two — sludge held fifty times longer than water — is the whole reason the activated-sludge process works.
Final Results — secondary treatment at 15 000 m³/d average flow
PartQuantityResultComment
(a)Total clarifier surface area1 000 m²$A = Q/\mathrm{SOR}$
(a)Surface area of each clarifier500 m²two units in parallel
(a)Diameter of each clarifier25.2 mbuild 25.5 m; SOR then 14.7 m³/m²·d
(b)Mixed-liquor flow to the clarifiers25 000 m³/d$Q + Q_R$, return ratio 0.67
(b)Solids loading rate75 kg/m²·d = 3.1 kg/m²·hwithin the 4 to 6 kg/m²·h design range
(c)Solids inventory in the aeration tank15 000 kg$VX$
(c)Solids wasted per day900 kg/d$Q_W X_W$
(c)Solids retention time (sludge age)16.7 daysample for year-round nitrification
—Hydraulic retention time (aeration tank)8.0 hourscontext for the SRT

Check: two assumptions are worth stating explicitly, because a marker will look for them. First, effluent suspended solids are taken as negligible in the SRT calculation, since the question supplies no value; at a typical 15 mg/L the effluent would carry $15\,000 \times 0.015 = 225$ kg/d, which would reduce the SRT from 16.7 to about 13.3 days, so the answer above is the upper bound. Second, the stated waste sludge concentration of 6 000 mg/L is used exactly as given, but it is not what a solids balance around the clarifier would predict: with negligible effluent solids the underflow would concentrate to $(Q+Q_R)X/Q_R = 25\,000 \times 3\,000/10\,000 = 7\,500$ mg/L, and wasting at that concentration would give an SRT of 13.3 days. The 6 000 mg/L figure is consistent with wasting from a point of lower concentration, such as directly from the mixed liquor line or from a diluted return header. The question's own data governs, so 16.7 days is the answer; the 13.3-day figure is the sensitivity a designer would carry forward.