16-Civ-B5 Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment · December 2019
Question 5 of 5: Discharge and Velocity in a Partly Full Sewer
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examination, December 2019 — 16-Civ-B5 Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment. Three hours; closed book with one aid sheet written on both sides; an approved Casio or Sharp calculator is permitted. Question 1 is compulsory; attempt any three of the remaining four. All five questions carry 25 marks, so the paper is marked out of 100. Every question is solved here, because the complete set is the study resource.
Reference texts for this subject. Metcalf & Eddy / Tchobanoglous, Stensel, Tsuchihashi & Burton, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill) — the primary reference for Q1(ii)–(iv), Q3 and Q5. Crittenden et al., MWH's Water Treatment: Principles and Design, 3rd ed. (Wiley) — coagulation, disinfection and filtration for Q1(i), Q1(v), Q2 and Q4(a). Davis, Water and Wastewater Engineering: Design Principles and Practice (McGraw-Hill) and Mihelcic & Zimmerman, Environmental Engineering: Fundamentals, Sustainability, Design (Wiley) — distribution systems and sewer hydraulics for Q4(b) and Q5. Canadian regulatory frame: Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (Health Canada), the Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (CCME) for ammonia, and the federal Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations (SOR/2012-139).
Check — assumptions declared once, used throughout. The paper supplies no water-quality data for Q1–Q4, so every illustrative number below is the solver's own representative value, clearly labelled where it is introduced; the marks lie in the definitions and the reasoning, and the numbers are there to make each distinction concrete. Free-chlorine speciation uses pKa = 7.54 at 25 °C; ammonia speciation uses the Emerson relation. Q5 is solved from the supplied partial-flow curves and independently from the exact circular-segment geometry.
Question 5: Discharge and Velocity in a Partly Full Sewer (25 marks)
Find. The discharge and mean velocity when the sewer runs full, and the discharge and mean velocity at a flow depth of 200 mm, using the supplied partial-flow curves.
Figure 5.1 — Wetted cross-section at d = 200 mm in the 300 mm sewer. The flow occupies two-thirds of the diameter, so the wetted arc subtends θ = 218.9° at the centre — more than a half circle, which is why the partial hydraulic radius exceeds the full-bore value.
Approach. Uniform flow is assumed, so the friction slope equals the invert slope. Compute the full-bore area and hydraulic radius, apply Manning's equation to obtain V and Q, enter the supplied chart at d/D = 0.667 to read q/Q and v/V, and multiply. The chart read is then confirmed independently from the exact circular-segment geometry.
Slope from the invert drop. For uniform flow in a gravity sewer the energy grade line, the hydraulic grade line and the invert are all parallel, so the friction slope is simply
$$S = \frac{\Delta z}{L} = \frac{0.25}{100} = 0.0025\ \text{m/m}$$
Full-bore geometry. A pipe flowing just full has
$$A = \frac{\pi D^2}{4} = \frac{\pi(0.300)^2}{4} = 0.0707\ \text{m}^2, \qquad R = \frac{D}{4} = 0.0750\ \text{m}$$
The hydraulic radius of a full circular pipe is D/4 because the area πD2/4 divided by the perimeter πD leaves D/4 — a result worth quoting, since it is the single most useful shortcut on this type of question.
Full-bore velocity and discharge by Manning. Substituting into
$$V = \frac{1}{n}R^{2/3}S^{1/2} = \frac{1}{0.013}(0.0750)^{2/3}(0.0025)^{1/2} = \frac{1}{0.013}(0.1779)(0.0500)$$
gives V = 0.684 m/s, and hence
$$\boxed{V_{\text{full}} = 0.684\ \text{m/s}, \qquad Q_{\text{full}} = AV = 0.0707 \times 0.684 = 0.0484\ \text{m}^3/\text{s} = 48.4\ \text{L/s}}$$
Relative depth and the chart read. The flow depth is
$$\frac{d}{D} = \frac{200}{300} = 0.667$$
Entering the supplied partial-flow curves at d/D = 0.667 and reading across to each curve gives
$$\frac{q}{Q} \approx 0.78, \qquad \frac{v}{V} \approx 1.11$$
Note carefully that the velocity ratio exceeds unity. This is not an error in reading the chart; above about half depth a partly full pipe flows faster than the same pipe running full, because the wetted perimeter contributed by the pipe crown is removed while most of the area remains.
Figure 5.2 — The supplied partial-flow curves, entered at d/D = 0.667. The discharge curve gives q/Q = 0.78 and the velocity curve v/V = 1.11; the velocity curve peaks at 1.14 near d/D = 0.81 and the discharge curve at 1.08 near d/D = 0.94.
Partial discharge and velocity. Multiplying the ratios by the full-bore values,
$$q = 0.78 \times 48.4 = 37.7\ \text{L/s}, \qquad v = 1.11 \times 0.684 = 0.76\ \text{m/s}$$
$$\boxed{q \approx 37.8\ \text{L/s}, \qquad v \approx 0.76\ \text{m/s at }d = 200\ \text{mm}}$$
Independent check from the exact segment geometry. The chart should never be the only evidence for a boxed answer. The wetted arc subtends
$$\theta = 2\cos^{-1}\!\left(1-\frac{2d}{D}\right) = 2\cos^{-1}(-0.3333) = 3.8213\ \text{rad} = 218.94^{\circ}$$
from which the circular-segment properties follow directly:
$$A_p = \frac{D^2}{8}(\theta - \sin\theta) = \frac{0.300^2}{8}(3.8213+0.6285) = 0.0501\ \text{m}^2$$
$$P_p = \frac{\theta D}{2} = 0.573\ \text{m}, \qquad R_p = \frac{A_p}{P_p} = 0.0873\ \text{m}$$
Applying Manning to the partial section, $v = (1/0.013)(0.0873)^{2/3}(0.0025)^{1/2} = 0.757$ m/s and $q = A_pv = 0.0379$ m3/s = 37.9 L/s, giving exact ratios of q/Q = 0.784 and v/V = 1.107. These reproduce the chart read to within the width of a pencil line, which confirms both the answer and the fact that the supplied curves belong to the constant-n family. Note that $R_p = 0.0873$ m is larger than the full-bore $R = 0.0750$ m — the arithmetic reason the part-full velocity exceeds the full-bore velocity.
Design checks the numbers now make available. A 25-mark question that asks for two numbers is asking for the engineering that follows from them. The boundary shear at this depth is
$$\tau = \rho g R_p S = 1000 \times 9.81 \times 0.0873 \times 0.0025 = 2.14\ \text{Pa}$$
which clears the 1.5 Pa self-cleansing threshold, so the sewer will not silt at this flow, though it falls short of the 3–4 Pa needed to scour an established deposit. The Froude number, taken on the hydraulic depth $D_h = A_p/T$ with top width $T = D\sin(\theta/2) = 0.283$ m, is
$$Fr = \frac{v}{\sqrt{gD_h}} = \frac{0.757}{\sqrt{9.81 \times 0.177}} = 0.57$$
so the flow is comfortably subcritical and free of the standing waves and depth instability that plague sewers running near Fr = 1. Finally, the velocity of 0.76 m/s exceeds the 0.6 m/s minimum required by Canadian municipal standards, so the pipe satisfies its design velocity at this depth.
Question 5 — results
Quantity
Symbol
Result
Friction slope
S
0.0025 m/m
Full-bore area / hydraulic radius
A, R
0.0707 m2, 0.0750 m
Velocity flowing full
V
0.684 m/s
Discharge flowing full
Q
0.0484 m3/s = 48.4 L/s
Relative depth
d/D
0.667
Chart ratios (exact values in brackets)
q/Q, v/V
0.78 (0.784), 1.11 (1.107)
Velocity at d = 200 mm
v
0.76 m/s
Discharge at d = 200 mm
q
37.9 L/s
Tractive force at 200 mm depth
τ
2.14 Pa (self-cleansing)
Froude number
Fr
0.57 (subcritical)
Check — two named traps and one assumption. (1) Using R = D/4 together with the partial area gives 34.2 L/s, 10 per cent low, because at two-thirds depth the partial hydraulic radius is larger, not smaller, than the full-bore value — the sign of this error reverses either side of half depth. (2) Reading the two curves the wrong way round gives 53.7 L/s and 0.53 m/s, 42 per cent high on discharge. (3) The solution assumes steady uniform flow with the friction slope equal to the invert slope, and a Manning n that does not vary with depth; the supplied chart is the constant-n family, confirmed above by the exact geometry. Had the variable-n curves been intended, q/Q would be about 0.72 and the discharge about 35 L/s.