16-Civ-B5 Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment · Undated paper
Question 5 of 5: Partial flow in a 300 mm sewer
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format and reference texts
Paper format. National Examination, May 2019 —
16-Civ-B5 Water Supply and Wastewater Engineering. Three hours;
closed book with one aid sheet written on both sides; an approved Casio or
Sharp calculator is permitted. Question 1 is compulsory and candidates
attempt any three of Questions 2 to 5, so 100 marks are on offer from a
125-mark set. Marks are shown at the end of each question, and the paper
states that clarity and organisation of answers are important. Because the
set is a study resource rather than a sitting, all five questions
are solved here.
Crittenden et al., MWH's Water Treatment: Principles and
Design, 3rd ed. — coagulation, flocculation, filtration,
disinfection chemistry.
Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering,
5th ed. — population equivalent, peaking factors, distribution
systems, sewer hydraulics.
Mihelcic & Zimmerman, Environmental Engineering: Fundamentals,
Sustainability, Design, 3rd ed. — mass balances and effluent
loading.
APHA / AWWA / WEF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater — indicator-organism enumeration, residual chlorine.
Health Canada, Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality
(GCDWQ); CCME, Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines — the
Canadian regulatory frame used throughout.
Check: page 1 of the paper carries the header 16-Civ-B5-May 2019 - Page 1 of 3 and the title NATIONAL EXAMINATION, MAY 2019, so this is the May 2019 sitting. Where the exam says "make suitable assumptions", every assumed value is stated explicitly at the point of use.
Question 5: Partial flow in a 300 mm sewer (25 marks)
Find. The discharge $q$ and the mean velocity $v$ at
$d/D = 0.30$.
Approach. Uniform flow in a sewer means the friction slope
equals the invert slope, so Manning's equation gives the full-bore condition
first; the supplied hydraulic-elements curves then convert full-bore values to
partial-flow values by the ratios $q/Q$ and $v/V$ read at $d/D=0.30$. The
closed-form circular geometry is used alongside as an independent check on the
chart reading.
Slope from the invert drop. The pipe runs partly full at a
constant depth, so the flow is uniform and the water surface is parallel to the
invert:
$$S=\frac{\Delta z}{L}=\frac{1.0}{200}=\boxed{0.005\ \text{(1 in 200)}}$$
Full-bore geometry. For a circular pipe running just full
the wetted perimeter is the whole circumference, so
$$A=\frac{\pi D^2}{4}=\frac{\pi(0.300)^2}{4}=0.07069\ \text{m}^2,\qquad
R=\frac{A}{P}=\frac{\pi D^2/4}{\pi D}=\frac{D}{4}=0.0750\ \text{m}$$
Full-bore velocity and discharge from Manning.
$$V=\frac{1}{n}R^{2/3}S^{1/2}
=\frac{1}{0.013}(0.0750)^{2/3}(0.005)^{1/2}
=76.92\times 0.17785\times 0.07071=0.967\ \text{m/s}$$
$$Q=AV=0.07069\times 0.967=0.0684\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}
=\boxed{68.4\ \text{L/s running full}}$$
Read the supplied partial-flow curves at $d/D=0.30$.
Entering the chart on the depth axis at 0.30 and crossing to the two curves,
$$\frac{q}{Q}\approx 0.20,\qquad \frac{v}{V}\approx 0.78$$
so directly
$$q\approx 0.20\times 68.4=13.7\ \text{L/s},\qquad
v\approx 0.78\times 0.967=0.75\ \text{m/s}$$
[Figure not reproduced: Left: the 300 mm sewer at d/D = 0.30. Right: the supplied partial-flow curves, redrawn from the closed-form geometry for constant Manning n, with the reading at d/D = 0.30 marked. See the official exam paper.]
Confirm the reading with the closed-form geometry. A chart
read to two figures deserves a check. With $\theta$ the angle subtended at the
centre by the wetted perimeter,
$$\theta=2\arccos\!\left(1-\frac{2d}{D}\right)=2\arccos(0.4)=2.3186\
\text{rad}\ (132.8^{\circ})$$
$$A_p=\frac{D^2}{8}(\theta-\sin\theta)
=\frac{0.09}{8}(2.3186-0.7333)=0.01783\ \text{m}^2$$
$$P_p=\frac{\theta D}{2}=0.3478\ \text{m},\qquad
R_p=\frac{A_p}{P_p}=\frac{0.01783}{0.3478}=0.05128\ \text{m}$$
Manning applied to the partial section.
$$v=\frac{1}{n}R_p^{2/3}S^{1/2}
=76.92\times(0.05128)^{2/3}\times 0.07071=\boxed{0.751\ \text{m/s}}$$
$$q=A_p\,v=0.01783\times 0.751=0.01339\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}
=\boxed{13.4\ \text{L/s}}$$
The implied ratios, $q/Q=0.196$ and $v/V=0.776$, reproduce the chart reading of
0.20 and 0.78 to within one part in fifty. That agreement also identifies which
family of curves the paper supplies: these are the constant-n curves.
The variable-$n$ family, which allows roughness to rise as the depth falls,
would give about 0.17 and 0.68 here, i.e. 11.6 L/s, so the distinction is worth
about 14 per cent and should be stated.
Check that the sewer is self-cleansing. The design test at
low flow is the boundary shear the flow exerts on a deposit:
$$\tau=\rho g R_p S=1000\times 9.81\times 0.05128\times 0.005
=\boxed{2.52\ \text{Pa}}$$
This clears the usual 1.5 Pa criterion for keeping organic solids moving, but it
is below the 3 to 4 Pa needed to re-mobilise a consolidated grit deposit, so the
pipe will stay clean if it is kept clean and will not recover on its own if it
is allowed to silt. The velocity, 0.75 m/s, likewise clears the customary
0.6 m/s minimum.
Check the flow regime. Using the hydraulic depth,
$$T=D\sin\!\frac{\theta}{2}=0.300\times 0.9165=0.275\ \text{m},\qquad
D_h=\frac{A_p}{T}=\frac{0.01783}{0.275}=0.0649\ \text{m}$$
$$\mathrm{Fr}=\frac{v}{\sqrt{g D_h}}=\frac{0.751}{\sqrt{9.81\times 0.0649}}
=0.94$$
The flow is subcritical but only just. A pipe operating this close to critical
is prone to standing waves and to depth instability at junctions and bends, so
the drop across any manhole on this reach should be checked rather than
assumed.
Name the two errors this problem is built to catch. First,
using the full-bore hydraulic radius with the partial area gives
$$q_{\text{wrong}}=A_p V=0.01783\times 0.967=17.3\ \text{L/s}$$
which is 29 per cent high; $R$ must be recomputed for the partial section
because a shallow flow has a disproportionately long wetted perimeter. Second,
interchanging the two curves gives $0.78\times 68.4=53$ L/s, four times the
correct answer. A useful guard against both is the half-depth identity, where
$q/Q=0.500$ and $v/V=1.000$ exactly: any chart read must approach those values
as $d/D\rightarrow 0.5$. It is also worth noting the peaks of these curves,
$q/Q=1.076$ at $d/D=0.938$ and $v/V=1.140$ at $d/D=0.813$, which explain why a
sewer running just below the crown carries more than the same sewer running
full.
Final results
Quantity
Value
Slope of the sewer
0.005 (1 in 200)
Full-bore area and hydraulic radius
0.0707 m$^2$; 0.0750 m
Full-bore velocity and discharge
0.967 m/s; 68.4 L/s
Chart ratios at $d/D=0.30$
$q/Q=0.20$; $v/V=0.78$
Discharge at 30 per cent full
13.4 L/s (0.0134 m$^3$/s)
Velocity at 30 per cent full
0.751 m/s
Boundary shear stress
2.52 Pa (self-cleansing, will not scour a deposit)
Froude number
0.94 — subcritical, close to critical
Check: the answer is read from the curves supplied with the paper and confirmed against the exact circular geometry, which agrees to 0.4 per cent. If the intended chart were the variable-$n$ family the discharge would fall to about 11.6 L/s; the constant-$n$ reading is adopted because it is the one the closed-form geometry reproduces.