11-CS-1 Engineering Economics · May 2017
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams — May 2017 — 11-CS-1 Engineering Economics. Open book; non-communicating calculator permitted. Any four of the five questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value. Fully worked solutions to all five questions follow; standard compound-interest factors are used and minor rounding is immaterial.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Repeatability—each press replaced identically at end of life (or compared over the LCM period, 100 years). Annual Worth builds this in.
Press X (20 yr), with $(A/P,9\%,20)=0.1095465$, $(A/F,9\%,20)=0.0195465$ and $(A/G,9\%,20)=6.76745$: $CR = 1{,}200{,}000(0.1095465)-300{,}000(0.0195465)=131{,}456-5{,}864=125{,}592$; maintenance $=6{,}000+800(6.76745)=6{,}000+5{,}414=11{,}414$.
Press Y (25 yr), with $(A/P,9\%,25)=0.1018063$, $(A/F,9\%,25)=0.0118063$ and $(A/G,9\%,25)=7.83160$: $CR = 1{,}400{,}000(0.1018063)-300{,}000(0.0118063)=142{,}529-3{,}542=138{,}987$; maintenance $=4{,}000+600(7.83160)=4{,}000+4{,}699=8{,}699$.
Since $EAC_X < EAC_Y$, select Press X.
Over the common (LCM = 100-year) period, $PW = EAC\times(P/A,9\%,100)$ for each; the same factor applies, so Press X is again preferred.
Yes, with the same MARR and a consistent study period.
Truncating Y to 20 years with unknown salvage $S_Y$: $CR = 1{,}400{,}000(0.1095465)-S_Y(0.0195465)=153{,}365-0.0195465\,S_Y$; instalment 14,000; running 8,000; 20-yr maintenance $=4{,}000+600(6.76745)=8{,}060$. Setting $EAC_Y(20)=EAC_X=167{,}006$:
A salvage of about $840,000 would be required for Press Y over 20 years—almost exactly 60% of its $1,400,000 cost, an implausibly high resale value. So over a 20-year horizon Press X remains the better choice for any realistic Y salvage.