NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

11-CS-1 Engineering Economics · May 2019

Question 1 of 5: Effective Rates on Three Credit Cards

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2019 — 11-CS-1 Engineering Economics. Three hours; open book; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Any four of the five questions constitute a complete exam paper and each question is of equal value (25 marks). Fully worked solutions to all five follow.

Question 1: Effective Rates on Three Credit Cards (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Each card quotes a nominal annual rate $r$ compounded $m$ times a year, so its interest rate per compounding period is $r/m$ and the effective annual rate is $i_a=(1+r/m)^m-1$.

(a) Effective Annual Rates

CardNominal ratePeriods per year, $m$Rate per period, $r/m$Effective annual rate
Silver Visa24%, daily3650.065753%27.11%
Fast Card25%, weekly520.480769%28.33%
Mach Express26%, monthly122.166667%29.33%
$$\text{Silver Visa: } (1+0.00065753)^{365}-1 = \boxed{27.11\%}$$
$$\text{Fast Card: } (1+0.00480769)^{52}-1 = \boxed{28.33\%}$$
$$\text{Mach Express: } (1+0.02166667)^{12}-1 = \boxed{29.33\%}$$

Note that the ordering by effective rate is the same as the ordering by nominal rate here: the extra compounding frequency of the daily card is not enough to overcome its 2-point lower nominal rate. That is not guaranteed in general, which is exactly why the conversion must be done rather than assumed.

(b) Effective Semi-Annual Rates

A half-year contains $m/2$ compounding periods, so $i_{sa}=(1+r/m)^{m/2}-1$. Equivalently $i_{sa}=(1+i_a)^{1/2}-1$, which is the quicker route once part (a) is done:

$$\text{Silver Visa: } (1+0.00065753)^{182.5}-1 = (1.271149)^{1/2}-1 = \boxed{12.75\%}$$
$$\text{Fast Card: } (1+0.00480769)^{26}-1 = (1.283256)^{1/2}-1 = \boxed{13.28\%}$$
$$\text{Mach Express: } (1+0.02166667)^{6}-1 = (1.293334)^{1/2}-1 = \boxed{13.72\%}$$

Each semi-annual rate is a little more than half its annual counterpart's nominal equivalent but a little less than half the effective annual rate, because $(1+i_{sa})^2=1+i_a$ compounds the half-year rate once.

(c) Which Card Would You Prefer?

These rates are charged on overdue balances — money the cardholder owes. A borrower therefore prefers the lowest effective rate, so the preference is Silver Visa, at 27.11% effective annually (12.75% effective semi-annually). Over a year, a $1,000 overdue balance costs $271 on Silver Visa against $283 on Fast Card and $293 on Mach Express.

(Had these been rates earned on deposits, the preference would reverse and Mach Express would be best. The comparison itself is neutral; it is the direction of the cash flow that decides which end of the ranking is wanted.)

(d) Break-Even Rate for Silver Visa against Fast Card

"Break-even" means Silver Visa costs a borrower exactly what Fast Card costs, i.e. the two effective annual rates are equal. Silver Visa compounds daily, so solve for its nominal rate $r$:

$$\left(1+\frac{r}{365}\right)^{365}-1 = 0.283256 \;\Longrightarrow\; 1+\frac{r}{365} = (1.283256)^{1/365} = 1.00068352$$
$$r = 365(0.00068352) = \boxed{24.95\%\ \text{compounded daily}}$$

Silver Visa could raise its quoted rate from 24% to about 24.95% compounded daily before a borrower became indifferent between it and Fast Card's 25% compounded weekly. The break-even nominal rate is below Fast Card's 25% because daily compounding is more frequent, so a smaller nominal rate produces the same effective cost.

← Paper overview