Question 7 of 7: Accident Case Analysis — Spray-Gun Amputation
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2013 — 11-CS-2 Engineering in Society: Health and Safety. Closed book; approved calculator permitted. Any five of the seven questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value. Answers are written in point form but fully, as instructed. Complete answers to all seven questions follow.
Immediate cause — the employee attempted to clean the clogged nozzle while the spray gun was still pressurized/energized (not de-energized or depressurized). The gun discharged high-pressure fluid into the thumb (a high-pressure injection injury), causing the laceration and subsequent amputation.
Contributing/root causes (multiple-factor):
Procedure/management — no safe procedure for clearing a clog; the tool was not required to be depressurized/locked out and relieved of pressure before servicing.
Training — the worker was unaware of the severe danger of high-pressure injection and of the correct clearing method.
Equipment — spray gun lacked adequate safeguards (e.g., trigger guard/lock, automatic pressure relief, or a design that prevents discharge when serviced).
Task/media — clogging (poor maintenance/filtration of the preventative) created the need to intervene.
(ii) Corrective Actions Required
Safe procedure (LOTO/depressurization) — require that the gun be shut off, disconnected from air/fluid supply, and pressure relieved before any cleaning or unclogging; never point at any body part.
Engineering — provide guns with trigger locks/guards and automatic pressure relief; improve fluid filtration/viscosity control to reduce clogging; consider design that cannot discharge during servicing.
Training — instruct workers on high-pressure injection hazards (which look minor but are surgical emergencies) and on the correct, safe unclogging method.
PPE — appropriate gloves/eye protection as a supplementary measure.
Maintenance — regular cleaning/servicing schedule to prevent clogs.
(iii) Follow-Up Action
Investigate and document the accident fully (root-cause analysis); report as legally required.
Implement the corrective actions and update the written safe-work procedure.
Retrain all affected employees on the new procedure and the injection hazard.
Verify effectiveness — inspect/audit to confirm the controls are in place and followed; monitor for recurrence.
Medical/return-to-work — ensure the injured worker receives care and a suitable return-to-work plan.
Share lessons learned across similar operations to prevent the same injury elsewhere.