NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

11-CS-3 Engineering Management · May 2016

Question 3 of 5: Comparison of 200 MW Generating Technologies

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2016 — 11-CS-3 Sustainability, Engineering and the Environment. Closed book; approved calculator permitted. Any four questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value (25 marks each).

Question 3: Comparison of 200 MW Generating Technologies (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

TechnologyLandFuel requirementGHG emissionsLocal health riskInitial costOperating cost (excl. fuel)
WindH (spacing)L (none)LLML
NuclearLM (uranium)LM–H (accident/waste)HM
Solar PV farmHL (none)LLM–HL
Natural-gas turbineLH (gas)ML–M (air pollutants)LL–M

Explanation

Wind: to reach 200 MW, turbines are spread over a wide area (high land, though the ground between remains usable); no fuel; negligible GHG and low local health risk; medium capital and low non-fuel operating cost. Nuclear: compact site; requires uranium fuel; near-zero GHG; the highest local health concern (radioactive-waste handling and low-probability accident); very high capital and moderate operating/maintenance cost. Solar PV farm: needs a large panel area (high land); no fuel; negligible GHG and low health risk; medium–high capital and low operating cost. Natural-gas turbine: compact; consumes natural gas (high fuel requirement); emits CO₂ (medium GHG) and some air pollutants (low–medium local health risk); low capital and low–medium non-fuel operating cost. Two notes on the ratings. Wind land is H by footprint, but the turbine pads and roads occupy only a few percent of it and farming continues between them, whereas a PV farm covers its ground almost completely. Nuclear fuel is M rather than H because of uranium's energy density: a 200 MW reactor needs only a few tonnes of enriched fuel a year, against roughly 0.3 million tonnes of natural gas a year for a gas turbine at the same full output. The pattern: renewables trade higher land use and capital for zero fuel and emissions; gas trades low capital for fuel dependence and CO₂; nuclear offers compact, low-carbon, reliable power at high capital cost and a distinctive risk profile.