23-CS-1 Engineering Economics · May 2014
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams — May 2014 — 11-CS-1 Engineering Economics. Open book; non-communicating calculator permitted. Any four of the five questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value. Fully worked solutions to all five questions follow; standard compound-interest factors are used and minor rounding is immaterial.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Using $i_{sa} = (1+i_a)^{1/2}-1$ (or half the compounding periods):
These are charges on overdue balances, i.e. rates you would pay. The borrower prefers the lowest effective rate, so Smart Visa is preferable (27.11%, the lowest), followed by Principal Card (28.33%) and then Acrobat Express (29.33%). The effective ranking happens to match the nominal ranking here, but that is not guaranteed: Smart Visa compounds most often, which lifts its effective rate 3.11 points above its nominal 24%, while Acrobat's monthly compounding adds 3.33 points to its 26%. The one-point gaps between the nominal rates are large enough that the compounding premiums do not reorder the three; with nominal rates closer together, daily compounding could make the lowest-quoted card the dearest. The comparison is only valid once all three are placed on the same effective basis.
Find the nominal rate $r$ (compounded daily) giving the same effective annual rate as Principal Card (28.33%):
At about 24.95% compounded daily, Smart Visa would match Principal Card's 28.33% effective annual rate. Note that the break-even nominal rate (24.95%) is below Principal Card's own nominal 25%, because daily compounding is more frequent than weekly.