NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-CS-1 Engineering Economics · December 2015

Question 3 of 5: Laser-Cutter Replacement — Remaining Economic Life

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2015 — 11-CS-1 Engineering Economics. Open book; non-communicating calculator permitted. Any four of the five questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value. Fully worked solutions to all five questions follow; standard compound-interest factors are used and minor rounding is immaterial.

Question 3: Laser-Cutter Replacement — Remaining Economic Life (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) EAC of Keeping the Old Cutter n More Years

$EAC(n) = 49{,}000(A/P,10\%,n) - S_n(A/F,10\%,n) + [\text{annualized O\&M}]$, where the O&M present worth is annualized with $(A/P,10\%,n)$:

n (yr)Capital costO&M equiv.EAC(n)
1$22,400$17,000$39,400
2$18,769$19,057$37,826
3$14,974$21,398$36,372
4$14,005$24,065$38,070

The $49,000 market value is the defender's first cost — it is what keeping the cutter costs the plant in forgone sale proceeds. Taking $n = 2$ as a worked example: $(A/P,10\%,2)=0.576190$ and $(A/F,10\%,2)=0.476190$, so the capital cost is $49{,}000(0.576190) - 19{,}875(0.476190) = 28{,}233 - 9{,}464 = \$18{,}769$. The O&M charges are not uniform, so they are first brought to the present, $17{,}000(0.909091) + 21{,}320(0.826446) = \$33{,}074$, and then spread over the two years: $33{,}074(0.576190) = \$19{,}057$. The two together give $EAC(2) = \$37{,}826$.

(b) Remaining Economic Life

The EAC is minimized at n = 3 years (≈$36,372), so the old cutter's remaining economic life is 3 years.

(c) Replace Now?

The new cutter's EAC ($35,000) is below the old cutter's minimum EAC over its remaining life ($36,372), and also below the old cutter's marginal cost of keeping it even one more year ($39,400). Since it is cheaper to own the new cutter than to keep the old one, yes—replace the old cutter now.

(d) Sunk Cost

The original $130,000 purchase price (paid 7 years ago) is the sunk cost. It cannot be recovered and is irrelevant to the replacement decision—only the current market value ($49,000) and future costs matter.