23-CS-1 Engineering Economics · May 2016
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams — May 2016 — 11-CS-1 Engineering Economics. Open book; non-communicating calculator permitted. Any four of the five questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value. Fully worked solutions to all five questions follow; standard compound-interest factors are used and minor rounding is immaterial.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Gasoline: $20{,}000\ \text{km}\times\frac{6.5}{100}\times\$0.75 = \$975$/yr. Hybrid: $20{,}000\times\frac{4.5}{100}\times\$0.75 = \$675$/yr. Hybrid saves $300/yr in fuel. Resale after $n$ years: model value $\times(0.9)^n$.
Net cost = price − resale + total fuel. With $(0.9)^3 = 0.729$:
The gasoline model is more economic after 3 years ($8,345 < $8,529)—the hybrid's fuel savings do not yet cover its higher net purchase cost.
The hybrid's extra net cost is $4{,}000(1-0.9^{n})$ (extra price less extra resale); its fuel saving is $300n$. The hybrid is justified when the saving covers the extra cost:
Testing: at $n=6$, $1{,}800 < 1{,}874$ (no); at $n=7$, $2{,}100 > 2{,}087$ (yes). The break-even is about $n\approx 6.9$, so roughly 7 years of ownership justifies buying the hybrid.
Fuel used per year: gasoline 1,300 L, hybrid 900 L, so the hybrid saves 400 L/yr, i.e. $400p$ per year at price $p$. Over 5 years the extra net cost is $4{,}000(1-0.9^{5}) = 4{,}000(0.40951)=\$1{,}638$. Setting the 5-year fuel saving equal to it:
At a gasoline price of about $0.82/L or higher, the hybrid becomes economic over a 5-year ownership.