NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-CS-3 Sustainability, Engineering and the Environment · December 2013

Question 3 of 5: Comparison of Renewable Energy Technologies

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2013 — 11-CS-3 Sustainability, Engineering and the Environment. Open book; non-communicating calculator permitted. Any four questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value (25 marks each).

Question 3: Comparison of Renewable Energy Technologies (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

TechnologyLand requirementCostNoiseEmissionsSafety concerns
Solar PVMedium–highMediumLowVery low (operation)Low; electrical, some toxic manufacturing materials
WindLow (footprint)/High (spacing)Low–mediumMediumVery low (operation)Blade throw, ice, bird/bat strikes
HydroelectricHigh (reservoir)Low (after build)LowLow (some reservoir methane)Dam failure/flooding risk
Geothermal (heating)LowMedium (drilling)LowVery lowLow; drilling, minor gas release
Biofuel (liquid)High (cropland)MediumLowModerate (combustion + farming)Flammability; food-vs-fuel land use

Explanation of Ratings

Solar PV: needs a medium-to-high area of panels for utility scale (though rooftops use existing space); moderate cost (falling); essentially silent; near-zero operating emissions but some toxic solvents and end-of-life panel waste; low safety risk beyond electrical hazards. Wind: turbines themselves occupy little ground (land between them remains usable) but require wide spacing; low-to-moderate and falling cost; audible aerodynamic and mechanical noise (a medium concern near homes); near-zero operating emissions; safety concerns include ice/blade throw and wildlife (bird and bat) strikes. Hydroelectric: reservoirs flood large land areas (high); very low operating cost once built; quiet; low emissions though flooded vegetation can release methane; the dominant safety concern is catastrophic dam failure. Geothermal for building heating: a small surface footprint (ground loops or wells); medium cost driven by drilling; quiet; very low emissions; low risk aside from drilling and occasional gas release. Liquid biofuel: demands large areas of cropland (high) and competes with food production; medium cost; low noise; only moderately "clean"—combustion emits CO₂ (nominally offset by crop uptake) and farming adds fertilizer and fuel emissions; safety concerns are fuel flammability and the food-versus-fuel land-use dilemma.