NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-CS-3 Sustainability, Engineering and the Environment · May 2014

Question 3 of 5: Comparison of Renewable Energy Technologies

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2014 — 11-CS-3 Sustainability, Engineering and the Environment. Closed book; approved calculator permitted. Any four questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value (25 marks each).

Question 3: Comparison of Renewable Energy Technologies (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

TechnologyLand requirementCostNoiseEmissionsSafety concerns
Solar PVMedium–highMediumLowLowLow (electrical; toxic manufacturing materials)
WindLow footprint / high spacingLow–mediumMediumLowMedium (blade/ice throw, birds/bats)
HydroelectricHigh (reservoir)Low (after build)LowLowMedium–high (dam failure)
Geothermal (heating)LowMediumLowLowLow (drilling)
Biofuel (liquid)High (cropland)MediumLowMediumMedium (flammable; food-vs-fuel)

Explanation of Ratings

Solar PV: needs sizeable panel area (medium–high), though rooftops reuse space; medium (falling) cost; silent; near-zero operating emissions but toxic manufacturing solvents and panel end-of-life; low risk beyond electrical. Wind: small ground footprint but wide spacing; low–medium cost; audible aerodynamic noise (medium near homes); near-zero operating emissions; safety risks of ice/blade throw and wildlife strikes. Hydroelectric: reservoirs flood large areas (high); very low operating cost; quiet; low emissions (some reservoir methane); dominant risk is dam failure. Geothermal heating: small footprint; medium cost (drilling); quiet; very low emissions; low risk. Liquid biofuel: large cropland demand (high) competing with food; medium cost; low noise; only moderately clean (combustion CO₂ plus farming emissions); flammability and food-vs-fuel concerns.