Question 2 of 7: Channel Capacity — Nyquist and Shannon
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
98-Comp-B5, Computer Communications — National Exams, May 2015. Closed-book, 3 hours; seven questions of equal value (20% each); ANY FIVE constitute a complete exam (all seven answered below as a complete study resource).
Reference texts: Stallings, Data and Computer Communications, 10th ed. — sampling and aliasing (Ch.5, Q1), channel capacity/Shannon-Hartley (Ch.3, Q2), PCM and uniform quantization (Ch.5, Q3), Manchester/Differential Manchester line coding (Ch.5, Q4), LAN/network topologies (Ch.16, Q5), spread spectrum (Ch.9, Q6), and physical/link/network-layer terminology (Ch.3, 6, 9, 16, 17, Q7); Kurose & Ross, Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach, 8th ed. — application-layer protocols and transport-layer terminology (Ch.1–3, Q7).
Question 2: Channel Capacity — Nyquist and Shannon (20 marks)
Convert the SNR from dB to a ratio.
$$\text{SNR (dB)} = 10\log_{10}(\text{SNR}) \;\Rightarrow\; \text{SNR} = 10^{30/10} = 10^{3} = 1000$$
Noisy capacity (Shannon–Hartley).
$$C_{\text{Shannon}} = B\log_2(1+\text{SNR}) = 5600 \times \log_2(1001) = 5600 \times 9.9672$$
$$C_{\text{Shannon}} = \boxed{55{,}816\text{ bps} \approx 55.82\text{ kbps}}$$
Since $C_{\text{Shannon}} < 2C_{\text{Nyquist}}$ here would require $M=\lceil 2^{C/2B}\rceil$ signal levels far beyond binary, this Shannon limit represents the theoretical ceiling reachable only with sufficiently many signal levels/advanced coding, not the binary-signalling result of Step 1.