Question 4 of 6: Thévenin equivalent with a controlled source, and maximum power transfer
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam — 16-Elec-A1 Circuits. 3 hours, closed-book; one approved Casio/Sharp calculator permitted. Any five of the six questions constitute a complete paper and all are of equal value — all six are solved in full below. A Laplace-transform table and a Δ–Y conversion set are supplied on the exam’s last two pages.
Reference texts: C. K. Alexander & M. N. O. Sadiku, Fundamentals of Electric Circuits (7th ed., McGraw-Hill) — series/parallel reduction, the Wheatstone bridge, nodal analysis, first-order RC/RL transients, phasor (AC) analysis, Thévenin’s theorem, maximum power transfer, and the Laplace-transform method; W. H. Hayt, Engineering Circuit Analysis (9th ed.) for the dependent-source and second-order (RLC) material.
Each reference node, source polarity and current direction is stated alongside the working so a reader can reproduce every sign.
Question 4: Thévenin equivalent with a controlled source, and maximum power transfer [6 + 6 + 2 + 6]
Figure 4 (rms phasors) — $I_s=5\angle{-30^\circ}\text{ A}$ in parallel with a $5\,\Omega$ (voltage $V_o$ across it); a series $-j2\,\Omega$ and $V_s=10\angle0^\circ\text{ V}$ ($+$ toward A) reach terminal A; the load side carries a $j4\,\Omega$, a dependent current source $4V_o$ (upward, into A) and $Z_L$, all between A and B.
Given (rms phasors). $I_s=5\angle{-30^\circ}\text{ A}$; the $5\,\Omega$ carries $V_o$ ($+$ at the top node, call it $M$, so $V_o=V_M$); series branch $M\!\to\!-j2\,\Omega\!\to\!V_s\!\to\!A$ with $V_s=10\angle0^\circ$ ($+$ at A); at A the branches $j4\,\Omega$, the VCCS $4V_o$ (arrow up = current injected into A) and $Z_L$ all return to B.
Find. $V_{th}$, $Z_{th}$, the matched $Z_L$, and $P_{L,\max}$.
Check — the controlled source makes this one-port active. With the figure taken literally (VCCS current $4V_o$ injected into node A, $V_o$ measured $+$ at the top of the $5\,\Omega$), the transconductance of $4\text{ S}$ is large enough that the Thévenin resistance comes out with a negative real part: the network can source power. The classical maximum-power-transfer result ($Z_L=Z_{th}^{*}$, $P_{\max}=|V_{th}|^2/4\,\mathrm{Re}\,Z_{th}$ for rms) assumes a passive Thévenin source ($\mathrm{Re}\,Z_{th}>0$); it is reported below with that caveat. Had the controlled-source reference been the opposite sense, one would instead get $Z_{th}=0.249-j0.082\,\Omega$, $Z_L=0.249+j0.082\,\Omega$ and $P_{\max}\approx323\text{ W}$.
Approach. Solve the two-node phasor network for the open-circuit voltage ($V_{th}=V_A$), then short A–B for $I_{sc}$; $Z_{th}=V_{th}/I_{sc}$ (a test source confirms it, since a dependent source is present).
Node equations (A open, $Z_L$ removed). Writing the series-branch current as $\big(V_M-(V_A-V_s)\big)/(-j2)$ and using $V_o=V_M$:$$M:\ 5\angle{-30^\circ}=\frac{V_M}{5}+\frac{V_M-(V_A-10)}{-j2},$$$$A:\ \frac{V_M-(V_A-10)}{-j2}+4V_M=\frac{V_A}{j4}.$$
Open-circuit voltage. Solving the pair gives $V_M=0.64\angle{-153.7^\circ}$ and $$V_{th}=V_A=\boxed{16.70\angle31.0^\circ\text{ V (rms)}}=14.31+j8.61\text{ V}.$$
Short-circuit current. Setting $V_A=0$, $V_{M,sc}=(I_s-10/(-j2))/(1/5+1/(-j2))$ and $I_{sc}=\dfrac{V_{M,sc}+10}{-j2}+4V_{M,sc}=60.6\angle{-123.5^\circ}\text{ A}.$
Thévenin impedance. $$Z_{th}=\frac{V_{th}}{I_{sc}}=\boxed{-0.249+j0.119\,\Omega.}$$ An independent driving-point test (kill $I_s$, short $V_s$, inject $1\text{ A}$ at A) returns the identical value. The negative real part flags an active one-port.
Matched load (part c). The conjugate-match condition is $$Z_L=Z_{th}^{*}=\boxed{-0.249-j0.119\,\Omega.}$$ Note this is a negative resistance: with an active source no passive $Z_L$ attains a finite maximum (see the check note); the conjugate value is the formal optimum of the transfer formula.
Maximum power (part b). The rms transfer formula $P_{L,\max}=\dfrac{|V_{th}|^2}{4\,\mathrm{Re}\,Z_{th}}=\dfrac{16.70^2}{4(-0.249)}$ evaluates to a negative number, i.e. it does not represent power delivered to a passive load — the theorem’s precondition $\mathrm{Re}\,Z_{th}>0$ is violated. The physically meaningful statement is that this terminal pair, as drawn, is a source rather than a sink; a bounded maximum exists only under the alternative sign convention noted above ($\approx323\text{ W}$).