Question 6 of 7: Additional poles/zeros and step-response specifications
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, 07-Elec-A2 Systems & Control, December 2013, 3 hours, closed book (approved calculator plus one signed 8.5 × 11" formula sheet). Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory; answer three of the remaining five (Q3–Q7). Each question is worth 20 marks. All seven are worked below so the set is complete.
Reference texts: N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering (7th ed., Wiley) — root locus (Ch. 8), frequency response / Bode and gain–phase margins (Ch. 10), stability and Routh–Hurwitz (Ch. 6), PID and cascade lead/lag compensation (Ch. 9–11), steady-state error and error constants (Ch. 7), state space and canonical forms (Ch. 3, 12); K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering (5th ed., Prentice Hall) — companion treatment of dominant-poles modelling, lead design and controllability; G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell & A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. All block diagrams, pole–zero maps, root loci and Bode plots below are redrawn as inline figures.
Reading the exam figures. Two questions supply printed plots: Q1 gives an open-loop Bode plot (used for the gain-margin reading) and Q6 Part B gives a measured step-response curve (used to read $K_{dc},\zeta,\omega_n$). The transfer functions are given exactly in the question text, so every reading below is also confirmed analytically (Bode by direct evaluation, stability by Routh–Hurwitz). Where the printed plot annotation and the exact model differ slightly, the exact model governs.
Pole–zero map: the pair $-1\pm j5$ sits far closer to the imaginary axis than the real poles $-16,-20$ (and the zero $-12$), so it dominates the response.
(a) Transfer function. $-1\pm j5$ give the factor $s^2+2s+26$, so $G(s)=\dfrac{K(s+12)}{(s+20)(s+16)(s^2+2s+26)}$. The DC gain fixes $K$: $\dfrac{K(12)}{(20)(16)(26)}=0.95\Rightarrow K=658.7$. Expanding, $$G(s)=\frac{658.7\,s+7904}{s^4+38s^3+418s^2+1576s+8320}.$$
(b) Why a second-order model. The real poles $-16,-20$ have real parts $16$–$20\times$ larger than the dominant pair's ($-1$); their modes decay $\ge16\times$ faster and are nearly cancelled by the neighbouring zero at $-12$, so they contribute negligibly to the transient. Keeping only $-1\pm j5$ and preserving the DC gain, $$G_m(s)=K_{dc}\frac{\omega_n^2}{s^2+2\zeta\omega_n s+\omega_n^2}=\frac{0.95(26)}{s^2+2s+26}=\frac{24.7}{s^2+2s+26},$$ with $\boxed{K_{dc}=0.95},\ \omega_n=\sqrt{26}=\boxed{5.10\ \text{rad/s}},\ \zeta=\dfrac{2}{2\omega_n}=\boxed{0.196}.$
Part B — Model identified from the step response [8]
Given (read from Figure Q6.1). Steady-state value $y_{ss}=0.85$; first peak $\approx1.16$ at $t_p\approx1.2$ s; first trough $\approx0.75$ at $t\approx2.2$ s.
Find. $K_{dc},\zeta,\omega_n$ and $G_m(s)$.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure Q6.1 (redrawn) — measured step response, showing $y_{ss}=0.85$, the first peak ($1.16$ at $1.2$ s) and the $\pm2\%$ settling band. See the official exam paper.]
DC gain. $K_{dc}=y_{ss}=\boxed{0.85}$ (unit-step input).
Damping from overshoot. $\text{PO}=\dfrac{1.16-0.85}{0.85}=0.365$, so $\zeta=\dfrac{-\ln0.365}{\sqrt{\pi^2+\ln^2 0.365}}=\boxed{0.306}.$
Natural frequency from peak time. $t_p=\dfrac{\pi}{\omega_n\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}=1.2\ \text{s}\Rightarrow \omega_n=\dfrac{\pi}{1.2\sqrt{1-0.306^2}}=\boxed{2.75\ \text{rad/s}}.$ (The peak-to-trough spacing of $1.0$ s gives a consistent damped period $T_d\approx2.0$ s.)