NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-A2 Systems and Control · May 2014

Question 8 of 8: Analytical step response and derivation of the 2nd-order specs

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, 07-Elec-A2 Systems & Control, May 2014, 3 hours, closed book (approved calculator plus one signed 8.5 × 11" formula sheet). Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory; answer three of the remaining six (Q3–Q8). Each question is worth 20 marks. All eight are worked below so the set is a complete study resource.

Reference texts: N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering (7th ed., Wiley) — Routh–Hurwitz and stability (Ch. 6), steady-state error and error constants (Ch. 7), root locus (Ch. 8), PID and lag/lead design (Ch. 9–11), frequency response, Nyquist and gain/phase margins (Ch. 10–11), state space, controllability/observability and pole placement (Ch. 3, 12); K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering (5th ed., Prentice Hall) — companion treatment of dominant-poles modelling and Mason’s rule; G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell & A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. All block diagrams, pole–zero maps, root loci, Bode/Nyquist plots and signal-flow graphs below are redrawn as inline figures.

Reading the exam figures. Q1 supplies an open-loop Bode plot and Q6 supplies open-loop Bode plots of the process. Where a transfer function is given exactly in the text (Q1’s system is the same plant as Q2, stated exactly there), every graphical reading is also confirmed analytically and the exact model governs. Q6 is a pure graph-reading problem (no closed form given); its numeric reads are approximate and are flagged accordingly. Note the printed exam mislabels the header of the last two pages “May 2013” — this is the May 2014 sitting throughout.

Question 8 — Analytical step response and derivation of the 2nd-order specs [10 + 10]

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Part A — Analytical step response [10]

Approach. Partial-fraction $Y(s)=G(s)/s$ (with a repeated pole at $-2$) and invert term-by-term using the Laplace table.

  1. Partial fractions. $$\frac{2s+5}{s(s+2)^2(s+4)}=\frac{A}{s}+\frac{B}{s+2}+\frac{C}{(s+2)^2}+\frac{D}{s+4}.$$
  2. Residues. $A=\dfrac{5}{16}$; $C=\left.\dfrac{2s+5}{s(s+4)}\right|_{-2}=-\dfrac14$; $D=\left.\dfrac{2s+5}{s(s+2)^2}\right|_{-4}=\dfrac{3}{16}$; $B=\dfrac{d}{ds}\!\left[\dfrac{2s+5}{s(s+4)}\right]_{-2}=-\dfrac12$.
  3. Invert. Using $\tfrac1s\to1$, $\tfrac{1}{s+a}\to e^{-at}$, $\tfrac{1}{(s+a)^2}\to t\,e^{-at}$: $$\boxed{y(t)=\tfrac{5}{16}-\tfrac12e^{-2t}-\tfrac14t\,e^{-2t}+\tfrac{3}{16}e^{-4t}.}$$
  4. Checks. $y(0)=\tfrac{5}{16}-\tfrac12+\tfrac{3}{16}=0$ ✓ and $y(\infty)=\tfrac{5}{16}=G(0)$ ✓ (initial and final value both consistent).
Step response of G(s)=(2s+5)/[(s+2)^2(s+4)] (over-damped, y(∞)=5/16)0.00.20.401234y_ss=0.3125time (s)
Step response of $G(s)=(2s+5)/[(s+2)^2(s+4)]$: over-damped (all real poles), monotonic rise to $y(\infty)=5/16$.

Part B — Derivation of the overshoot and settling-time formulas [10]

This part is a derivation, so it is written as flowing steps rather than a numeric table. Start from the unit-step response of the standard system (Laplace-table entry): $$y(t)=1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}\,e^{-\zeta\omega_n t}\,\sin\!\big(\omega_d t+\cos^{-1}\zeta\big),\qquad \omega_d=\omega_n\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}.$$

  1. Peak time. Setting $\dot y=0$, the derivative reduces to $\dfrac{\omega_n}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}e^{-\zeta\omega_n t}\sin(\omega_d t)=0$, whose first positive root is $t_p=\dfrac{\pi}{\omega_d}$.
  2. Overshoot. Evaluate $y(t_p)$. At $\omega_d t_p=\pi$, $\sin(\pi+\cos^{-1}\zeta)=-\sin(\cos^{-1}\zeta)=-\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}$, so $$y(t_p)=1-\frac{e^{-\zeta\omega_n\pi/\omega_d}}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}\big(-\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}\big)=1+e^{-\zeta\pi/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}.$$ Since the final value is $1$, the fractional overshoot is $y(t_p)-1$, hence $$\boxed{PO=100\,e^{-\zeta\pi/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}\ \%.}$$
  3. Settling time. The response is bounded by the exponential envelope $1\pm\dfrac{e^{-\zeta\omega_n t}}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}$. Entering the $\pm2\%$ band requires $\dfrac{e^{-\zeta\omega_n t}}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}\le0.02$. Taking the dominant exponential ($\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}\approx1$, $\ln(0.02)\approx-3.9\approx-4$): $$e^{-\zeta\omega_n T_s}=0.02\ \Rightarrow\ \boxed{T_{settle(\pm2\%)}=\frac{4}{\zeta\omega_n}.}$$
Standard under-damped 2nd-order step response (ζ=0.5): peak → PO, envelope → T_settle0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.40123456789101112y_ss=1.0time (s)t_p=π/ω_d, PO peak
Standard under-damped second-order step response ($\zeta=0.5$): peak at $t_p=\pi/\omega_d$ sets $PO$; the decaying envelope $e^{-\zeta\omega_n t}$ sets $T_{settle}=4/\zeta\omega_n$.
ResultExpression
Step response (Part A)$y(t)=\tfrac{5}{16}-\tfrac12e^{-2t}-\tfrac14te^{-2t}+\tfrac{3}{16}e^{-4t}$
Peak time$t_p=\pi/\omega_d$
Percent overshoot$PO=100e^{-\zeta\pi/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}$
Settling time$T_{settle(\pm2\%)}=4/(\zeta\omega_n)$
Back to the paper →