Question 7 of 8: Lead-controller design in the frequency domain
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, 07-Elec-A2 Systems & Control, December 2015, 3 hours, closed book (approved Casio/Sharp calculator plus one signed, double-sided 8.5 × 11" formula/notes sheet; a Laplace-transform table and the standard ζ–overshoot / ζ–resonant-peak design plots are supplied). Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory; a complete paper is five questions, so candidates choose three of Q3–Q8. Each question is worth 20 marks. All eight are worked below so the set is a complete study resource.
Reference texts: N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering (7th ed., Wiley) — time response and second-order specifications (Ch. 4), block/signal-flow reduction and Mason’s rule (Ch. 5), Routh–Hurwitz stability (Ch. 6), steady-state error and static error constants (Ch. 7), root locus (Ch. 8), PID / lead–lag design (Ch. 9–11), frequency response, Bode, Nyquist, gain and phase margins (Ch. 10–11), state space, controllability/observability and canonical forms (Ch. 3, 12); K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering (5th ed., Prentice Hall) — dominant-poles modelling and Mason’s gain formula; G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell & A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. All block diagrams, pole–zero maps, root loci, the Nyquist plot, the network schematic and the signal-flow graph below are redrawn as inline figures.
Reading the exam figures. Every transfer function in this paper is stated exactly, so every boxed result is confirmed analytically and the exact model governs. Q2 supplies a Bode plot ($G_m=32.2$ dB at $3.9$ rad/s, $P_m=-145^\circ$ at $0.324$ rad/s) and a root locus, and Q7 supplies the uncompensated Bode plot; values read from those curves are flagged as reads and cross-checked against the Routh/analytic results.
Question 7 — Lead-controller design in the frequency domain [15 + 5]
Given. $G(s)$ is Type 1. At $\omega=10$: $|G(j10)|=0.0632$, $\angle G(j10)=-198.4^\circ$. Targets: $e_{ss(ramp)}=0.1\Rightarrow K_v=10$; $\Phi_m=50^\circ$ at $\omega_{cp}=10$.
Find. $a_0,a_1,b_1$, $G_c(s)$, and the compensated step specs.
Part 1 — Lead-controller calculation [15]
Approach. The DC gain sets the velocity constant; the magnitude and phase conditions at the target crossover ($|G_cG|=1$, $\angle G_cG=-130^\circ$) fix the two time constants.
DC gain for the ramp error. $K_v=\lim_{s\to0}sG_c(s)G(s)=G_c(0)\cdot\dfrac{100}{5\cdot10}=2a_0$. Setting $K_v=10$ gives $\boxed{a_0=5}$.
Conditions at $\omega_{cp}=10$. $|G_cG(j10)|=1$ with $|G(j10)|=0.0632$ needs $|G_c(j10)|=\dfrac{1}{0.0632}=15.81$. $\angle G_cG(j10)=-180^\circ+50^\circ=-130^\circ$ with $\angle G(j10)=-198.4^\circ$ needs $\angle G_c(j10)=-130^\circ+198.4^\circ=+68.4^\circ$ — a strong lead.
Solve for $a_1,b_1$. With $G_c(j10)=\dfrac{a_0+j10a_1}{1+j10b_1}=\dfrac{5+j10a_1}{1+j10b_1}$, imposing the magnitude $15.81$ and phase $+68.4^\circ$ gives $$\boxed{a_1=1.50,\qquad b_1=0.00552.}$$
Controller. $$\boxed{G_c(s)=\frac{1.50\,s+5}{0.00552\,s+1}}$$ — zero at $-a_0/a_1=-3.33$ rad/s, pole at $-1/b_1=-181$ rad/s. The zero is nearer the imaginary axis than the pole, confirming a lead network; the pole/zero ratio $\approx54$ provides the large $68^\circ$ phase boost. Check: $G_c(j10)G(j10)$ has magnitude $1.00$ and phase $-130.0^\circ$, so $\Phi_m=50^\circ$ at $\omega_{cp}=10$ exactly.
Uncompensated (blue) vs lead-compensated (red dashed) open loop: the lead lifts the magnitude and adds phase near $\omega=10$ rad/s, moving the gain crossover to $10$ rad/s with a $50^\circ$ phase margin.
Settling time. With $\omega_{cp}=\omega_n\sqrt{\sqrt{1+4\zeta^4}-2\zeta^2}$ at $\zeta=0.5$, $\omega_n=10/0.786=12.7$ rad/s, so $T_{settle}(\pm2\%)=\dfrac{4}{\zeta\omega_n}=\dfrac{4}{6.36}=\boxed{0.63\ \text{s}}$.
Step error. $G_cG$ retains the integrator (Type 1), so $K_{pos}=\infty$ and $\boxed{e_{ss(step)}=0\%}$.
Quantity
Result
$a_0$ / $a_1$ / $b_1$
$5$ / $1.50$ / $0.00552$
$G_c(s)$
$(1.50s+5)/(0.00552s+1)$ — zero $-3.33$, pole $-181$