NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-A2 Systems and Control · May 2015

Question 5 of 8: Second-order dominant model three ways, and step estimates

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, 07-Elec-A2 Systems & Control, May 2015, 3 hours, closed book (approved Casio/Sharp calculator plus one signed, double-sided 8.5 × 11" formula/notes sheet; a Laplace-transform table and design plots are supplied with the paper). Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory; a complete paper is five questions, so candidates choose three of Q3–Q8. Each question is worth 20 marks. All eight are worked below so the set is a complete study resource.

Reference texts: N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering (7th ed., Wiley) — time response and second-order specifications (Ch. 4), block/signal-flow reduction and Mason’s rule (Ch. 5), Routh–Hurwitz stability (Ch. 6), steady-state error and static error constants (Ch. 7), root locus (Ch. 8), PID / lead–lag design (Ch. 9–11), frequency response, Bode, Nyquist, gain and phase margins (Ch. 10–11), state space, controllability/observability and pole placement (Ch. 3, 12); K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering (5th ed., Prentice Hall) — dominant-poles modelling and Mason’s gain formula; G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell & A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems. All block diagrams, pole–zero maps, root loci, Bode plots, signal-flow graphs and the Nyquist plot below are redrawn as inline figures.

Reading the exam figures. Where a transfer function is stated exactly (Q1–Q5, Q7, Q8A) every result is confirmed analytically and the exact model governs. Q4 supplies a Bode plot ($G_m=16.1$ dB at $2.05$ rad/s, $P_m=-85.1^\circ$ at $0.589$ rad/s) and a root locus; Q5 Parts A–B and Q6 use printed frequency-response plots, and Q8B a printed Nyquist diagram — values read from those curves are flagged as reads and cross-checked against the analytics wherever a transfer function is available.

Question 5 — Second-order dominant model three ways, and step estimates [5 + 5 + 5 + 5]

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Unity feedback, so $G_{cl}=\dfrac{G}{1+G}$; $G(0)=10$, hence $G_{cl}(0)=\dfrac{10}{11}=0.909$ (the DC gain of every model). The dominant pair is $s^2+3.26s+92.66$.

Find. $(K_{dc},\zeta,\omega_n)$ three ways and the step-response specs.

Closed-loop poles: dominant pair -1.63+-j9.53, far -23.74-30-25-20-15-10-50-10-5510ReIm
Closed-loop poles: dominant pair $-1.63\pm j9.53$ ($\omega_n=9.63$, $\zeta=0.17$) and a far real pole at $-23.74$ — the pair dominates, and its zero at $-100$ is remote.

Part A — Model from the closed-loop magnitude plot [5]

Figure-read values. From Figure Q5.1: low-frequency magnitude $\approx0.9$ (the DC gain), a resonant peak $\approx2.7$–$2.8$ V/V near $\omega_r\approx9.3$ rad/s.
  1. DC gain. $K_{dc}=|G_{cl}(0)|\approx\boxed{0.909}$.
  2. Damping from the peak. $M_r=\dfrac{\text{peak}}{K_{dc}}\approx\dfrac{2.55}{0.909}=2.80$; inverting $M_r=\dfrac{1}{2\zeta\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}$ gives $\boxed{\zeta\approx0.18}$.
  3. Natural frequency. $\omega_r=\omega_n\sqrt{1-2\zeta^2}\approx9.3$ $\Rightarrow\omega_n\approx\boxed{9.6\ \text{rad/s}}$, so $G_{m1}(s)=\dfrac{0.909\,\omega_n^2}{s^2+2\zeta\omega_ns+\omega_n^2}\approx\dfrac{83.7}{s^2+3.5s+92}$.

Part B — Model from the open-loop Bode plot [5]

  1. Gain crossover & phase margin. $|G(j\omega)|=1$ at $\omega_{cp}=8.83$ rad/s, where $\angle G=-156.5^\circ$, so $PM=23.5^\circ$.
  2. Damping from PM. $\zeta\approx\dfrac{PM}{100}=\boxed{0.235}$.
  3. Natural frequency. $\omega_{cp}=\omega_n\sqrt{\sqrt{1+4\zeta^4}-2\zeta^2}\Rightarrow\omega_n\approx9.2$ rad/s. With $K_{dc}=0.909$, $G_{m2}(s)\approx\dfrac{76.9}{s^2+4.3s+84.6}$.

Part C — Model from the dominant poles [5]

  1. Read the pair. $s^2+3.26s+92.66\Rightarrow\omega_n=\sqrt{92.66}=\boxed{9.63\ \text{rad/s}}$, $\zeta=\dfrac{3.26}{2(9.63)}=\boxed{0.169}$.
  2. Dominance & DC gain. The third pole $-23.74$ is $23.74/1.63=14.6\times$ farther out, so the pair dominates. Preserving $K_{dc}=0.909$: $$G_{m3}(s)=\frac{0.909(92.66)}{s^2+3.26s+92.66}=\frac{84.2}{s^2+3.26s+92.66}.$$

Part D — Consistency and step estimates [5]

Approach. All three give $\zeta\approx0.17$–$0.24$, $\omega_n\approx9.2$–$9.6$ rad/s and $K_{dc}=0.909$ — consistent. $G_{m3}$ (exact poles) is the reference.

  1. Overshoot. $PO=100\,e^{-\zeta\pi/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}=100\,e^{-0.169\pi/0.986}=\boxed{58\%}$ (large — $\zeta$ is small).
  2. Settling time. $T_{settle}(\pm2\%)=\dfrac{4}{\zeta\omega_n}=\dfrac{4}{0.169(9.63)}=\boxed{2.46\ \text{s}}$.
  3. Steady-state error. Type 0 with $K_{pos}=G(0)=10$, so $e_{ss}=\dfrac{1}{1+10}=\boxed{9.1\%}$ (equivalently $1-K_{dc}=1-0.909$).
Model$K_{dc}$$\zeta$$\omega_n$ (rad/s)Source
$G_{m1}$$0.909$$0.18$$9.6$closed-loop $M_r,\omega_r$
$G_{m2}$$0.909$$0.235$$9.2$open-loop PM, $\omega_{cp}$
$G_{m3}$$0.909$$0.169$$9.63$dominant poles (reference)
Step specs: $PO\approx58\%$, $T_{settle}\approx2.46$ s, $e_{ss}\approx9.1\%$