Question 8 of 8: Nyquist stability (Part A) and state-space response (Part B)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, 07-Elec-A2 Systems & Control, May 2016, 3 hours, closed book (approved Casio/Sharp calculator plus one signed, double-sided 8.5 × 11" formula sheet; a Laplace-transform table and the standard ζ–overshoot and ζ–resonant-peak design plots are supplied). Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory; a complete paper is five questions, so candidates choose three of Q3–Q8. Each question is worth 20 marks. All eight are worked below so the set is a complete study resource.
Reference texts: N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering (7th ed., Wiley) — time response and second-order specs (Ch. 4), block reduction (Ch. 5), Routh–Hurwitz (Ch. 6), steady-state error and static error constants (Ch. 7), root locus (Ch. 8), PID and lead–lag design (Ch. 9–11), frequency response, Bode, Nyquist, gain/phase margins (Ch. 10–11), state space, controllability/observability (Ch. 3, 12); K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering (5th ed., Prentice Hall) — dominant-poles modelling. All step responses, block diagrams, pole–zero maps, root loci, the Bode sketches and the Nyquist plot below are redrawn as inline figures.
Reading the supplied design charts. The percent overshoot chart uses $PO=100\,e^{-\zeta\pi/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}$ and the second-order model is $G_m(s)=K_{dc}\,\dfrac{\omega_n^2}{s^2+2\zeta\omega_n s+\omega_n^2}$; the figures on the exam paper (step responses, root loci, Bode plots) are read graphically, so the values below carry normal chart-reading tolerance.
Question 8 — Nyquist stability (Part A) and state-space response (Part B) [10 + 10]
Q8A: polar plot of $G_{open}(j\omega)/K$ — descends from $\text{Re}\!\to\!-0.24,\ \text{Im}\!\to\!+\infty$, crosses the real axis at $-0.2$, and returns to the origin from below.
Real-axis crossover. $\text{Im}=0\Rightarrow\omega=\sqrt5=2.24$ rad/s, where $\text{Re}=-6/30=\boxed{-0.20}$.
Imaginary-axis behaviour. $\text{Re}=-6/(\omega^2+25)\lt0$ for all $\omega$, so the plot never crosses the imaginary axis; as $\omega\to0^+$ it runs off to $+j\infty$ asymptotic to the vertical line $\text{Re}=-6/25=-0.24$, and as $\omega\to\infty$ it approaches the origin from the third quadrant ($\angle\to-90^\circ$).
Part A(2) — Nyquist criterion
Open-loop RHP poles. $P=1$ (the pole at $+5$); the pole at the origin is handled by an infinitesimal right indentation of the $\Gamma$-path.
Encirclement requirement. For closed-loop stability $Z=N+P=0$ needs $N=-1$ (one counter-clockwise encirclement of $-1$).
Critical gain. The real-axis crossing sits at $-0.2K$; it reaches $-1$ when $K=1/0.2=5$. For $K\gt5$ the point $-1$ is enclosed to give the required CCW encirclement, so the loop is $\boxed{\text{stable for }K_p\gt5}$ (unstable for $K_p\lt5$).
Cross-check (Routh). $s(s-5)+K(1+s)=s^2+(K-5)s+K=0$ is stable iff $K-5\gt0$ and $K\gt0$, i.e. $K\gt5$ — identical.