Question 7 of 8: Analytical Step Response from a State-Space Model
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2019 —
16-Elec-A2, Systems & Control. Three hours, closed book
(approved Casio or Sharp calculator plus one double-sided handwritten 8.5×11″ formula
sheet). Eight questions of 20 marks each. Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory;
candidates then choose three of the remaining six, so five questions constitute a complete
paper (100 marks). A short table of Laplace transforms and a page of standard second-order
plots and formulae are supplied with the paper. Every one of the eight questions is
solved below, because the full set is the more useful study resource.
Reference texts.
Nise, Control Systems Engineering, 8th ed. — root locus (Ch. 8), frequency
response and Nyquist (Ch. 10), design via frequency response (Ch. 11), state space (Ch. 12).
Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 5th ed. — Routh–Hurwitz (§5.6),
lead/lag design (Ch. 6), state-space controllability and observability (Ch. 9).
Dorf & Bishop, Modern Control Systems, 13th ed. — performance of
second-order systems (Ch. 5), stability (Ch. 6).
Franklin, Powell & Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 8th ed.
— dominant-pole approximation and pole placement (Ch. 7).
Check: figure reads. Questions 2, 3, 5 and 8 depend on
plotted data. Every value quoted below was read from the printed figures. Chart reads carry a
tolerance of roughly the last quoted digit; where a graphical read drives a design, the exact
analytical value is given alongside it.
Question 7: Analytical Step Response from a State-Space Model (20 marks)
Find. The complete output response $y(t)$ for $t \ge 0$ in closed form.
Approach. With zero initial conditions the response is entirely the forced
term, so the quickest exact route is to transform to the s-domain: obtain
$G(s) = C(sI-A)^{-1}B$, multiply by the step transform $1/s$, expand in partial fractions and
invert term by term using the supplied Laplace table.
Form $sI - A$ and its determinant.
$$sI - A = \begin{bmatrix} s+1 & -1 \\ 3 & s+5 \end{bmatrix}$$
$$\det(sI-A) = (s+1)(s+5) - (-1)(3) = s^2+6s+5+3 = s^2+6s+8 = (s+2)(s+4)$$
The system eigenvalues are therefore $-2$ and $-4$: both in the left half plane, so the response
will be a stable, non-oscillatory decay to a constant.
Invert the matrix. For a $2\times2$ matrix the adjugate is immediate:
$$(sI-A)^{-1} = \frac{1}{(s+2)(s+4)}\begin{bmatrix} s+5 & 1 \\ -3 & s+1 \end{bmatrix}$$
Compute the transfer function. First
$$(sI-A)^{-1}B = \frac{1}{(s+2)(s+4)}
\begin{bmatrix} s+5 & 1 \\ -3 & s+1 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}
= \frac{1}{(s+2)(s+4)}\begin{bmatrix} -(s+5) \\ 3 \end{bmatrix}$$
and premultiplying by $C = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ selects the second entry:
$$\boxed{\,G(s) = \frac{Y(s)}{U(s)} = \frac{3}{(s+2)(s+4)}\,}$$
Note the numerator is a constant — the system has no finite zeros, and the $-(s+5)$ term is
discarded because the output measures $x_2$ only.
Apply the step input. With $U(s) = 1/s$ and zero initial conditions,
$$Y(s) = \frac{3}{s(s+2)(s+4)}$$
Expand in partial fractions. Writing
$Y(s) = \dfrac{A_0}{s} + \dfrac{A_1}{s+2} + \dfrac{A_2}{s+4}$ and using the cover-up rule,
$$A_0 = \frac{3}{(2)(4)} = 0.375, \qquad
A_1 = \frac{3}{(-2)(-2+4)} = \frac{3}{-4} = -0.75, \qquad
A_2 = \frac{3}{(-4)(-4+2)} = \frac{3}{8} = 0.375$$
Invert term by term. Using $1/s \leftrightarrow 1(t)$ and
$1/(s+a) \leftrightarrow e^{-at}1(t)$ from the supplied table,
$$\boxed{\,y(t) = 0.375 - 0.75\,e^{-2t} + 0.375\,e^{-4t}, \qquad t \ge 0\,}$$
Check the endpoints. At $t = 0$,
$y(0) = 0.375 - 0.75 + 0.375 = 0$, which is correct because the state starts at rest and there is
no direct feedthrough ($D = 0$). Differentiating, $\dot{y}(0) = 1.5 - 1.5 = 0$ as well —
consistent with a relative degree of two, since the step must propagate through both integrators
before the output can move. As $t \to \infty$ both exponentials vanish and
$$y(\infty) = 0.375 = \frac{3}{8} = G(0)$$
matching the DC gain, exactly as the final-value theorem requires. The response is overdamped,
rising monotonically to 0.375 with the slower $e^{-2t}$ mode dominating the approach.
Figure 7.1 — Computed unit-step response y(t) = 0.375 - 0.75e^(-2t) + 0.375e^(-4t). The response is overdamped with zero initial value and slope, settling at the DC gain 0.375.