NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-A3 Signals and Communications · May 2013

Question 5 of 6: Envelope Detection of DSB-SC Signals

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 07-Elec-A3 Signals and Communications. Three hours, closed book; one double-sided aid sheet and an approved calculator are permitted. Six questions are printed and any five constitute a complete paper, all of equal value (20 marks each). All six are solved below, because the set is intended as a study resource rather than an exam script.

Reference texts. B. P. Lathi & Z. Ding, Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 4th ed. (Oxford), Ch. 3–4 for Fourier analysis and amplitude modulation; B. P. Lathi, Linear Systems and Signals, 2nd ed., Ch. 2–7 for convolution, Fourier series and the Fourier transform; A. V. Oppenheim & A. S. Willsky, Signals and Systems, 2nd ed., Ch. 2–4 and Ch. 10 for the discrete-time system material; J. G. Proakis & D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing, 4th ed., Ch. 3 and Ch. 7 for the z-transform and Direct Form II realisations.

Question 5: Envelope Detection of DSB-SC Signals (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Four baseband signals, each multiplied by a carrier $\cos\omega_c t$ with $\omega_c$ far above every baseband component, giving the transmitted signal $s(t)=x(t)\cos\omega_c t$.

Find. Which of the four can be demodulated by a simple envelope detector (diode, RC time constant), with justification.

Approach. An envelope detector recovers the magnitude of the slowly varying multiplier, i.e. $|x(t)|$, not $x(t)$ itself. So the single criterion is whether $x(t)$ ever changes sign.

  1. State the criterion. Writing $s(t)=x(t)\cos\omega_c t=|x(t)|\cos\!\left(\omega_c t+\phi(t)\right)$ with $\phi=0$ where $x\gt 0$ and $\phi=\pi$ where $x\lt 0$, the envelope is $|x(t)|$. Hence $$\boxed{\ \text{envelope detection recovers }x(t)\iff x(t)\ge 0\ \text{for all }t\ }$$ Every sign reversal of the message appears at the detector as a rectified fold, which is irreversible distortion.
  2. (a) $x=2\cos(2\pi f_1 t)$. The minimum is $-2$, so the message reverses sign twice per cycle. The envelope is $2|\cos(2\pi f_1 t)|$, a full-wave-rectified cosine at twice the message frequency. Not recoverable by envelope detection; coherent (synchronous) detection is required.
  3. (b) $x=\cos(2\pi f_1 t)+\cos(2\pi f_2 t)$. Written as $2\cos\!\left(\pi(f_1-f_2)t\right)\cos\!\left(\pi(f_1+f_2)t\right)$, this is a beat waveform whose minimum is $-2$; it passes through zero at every beat null. Not recoverable.
  4. (c) $x=2+\cos(2\pi f_1 t)$. The DC term dominates: $x_{\min}=2-1=1\gt 0$, so $|x(t)|=x(t)$ everywhere. Recoverable. The envelope reproduces the message with a DC pedestal, removed by the detector output capacitor. Strictly this is conventional AM with modulation index $\mu=\tfrac{1}{2}=50\%$ rather than true DSB-SC, since a carrier term $2\cos\omega_c t$ is transmitted.
  5. (d) $x=2+2\cos(2\pi f_1 t)+\cos(2\pi f_2 t)$. The two tones can align in anti-phase with the pedestal, giving $x_{\min}=2-2-1=-1\lt 0$ whenever $f_1$ and $f_2$ are incommensurate (a numerical sweep over 600 001 samples confirms the minimum reaches $-1$). Because the pedestal is smaller than the summed tone amplitudes the carrier is over-modulated. Not recoverable — raising the DC term above 3 would fix it.
tx(t)20406031min x(t) = 1 > 0 -> envelope = x(t): recoverable
Case (c): the message never crosses zero (minimum +1), so the envelope equals the message and detection is distortion-free.
tx(t)2040605-1min x(t) = -1 < 0 -> envelope = |x(t)|: NOT recoverable
Case (d): the pedestal of 2 is smaller than the combined tone amplitude of 3, so the message dips to -1 and the envelope detector rectifies (over-modulation).
CaseMessageMinimumEnvelope detection?
(a)$2\cos 2\pi f_1 t$$-2$No — needs coherent detection
(b)$\cos 2\pi f_1 t+\cos 2\pi f_2 t$$-2$No
(c)$2+\cos 2\pi f_1 t$$+1$Yes ($\mu=50\%$)
(d)$2+2\cos 2\pi f_1 t+\cos 2\pi f_2 t$$-1$No — over-modulated