Question 5 of 6: Envelope Detection of DSB-SC Signals
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 07-Elec-A3 Signals and Communications. Three hours, closed book; one double-sided aid sheet and an approved calculator are permitted. Six questions are printed and any five constitute a complete paper, all of equal value (20 marks each). All six are solved below, because the set is intended as a study resource rather than an exam script.
Reference texts. B. P. Lathi & Z. Ding, Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 4th ed. (Oxford), Ch. 3–4 for Fourier analysis and amplitude modulation; B. P. Lathi, Linear Systems and Signals, 2nd ed., Ch. 2–7 for convolution, Fourier series and the Fourier transform; A. V. Oppenheim & A. S. Willsky, Signals and Systems, 2nd ed., Ch. 2–4 and Ch. 10 for the discrete-time system material; J. G. Proakis & D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing, 4th ed., Ch. 3 and Ch. 7 for the z-transform and Direct Form II realisations.
Question 5: Envelope Detection of DSB-SC Signals (20 marks)
Given. Four baseband signals, each multiplied by a carrier $\cos\omega_c t$ with $\omega_c$ far above every baseband component, giving the transmitted signal $s(t)=x(t)\cos\omega_c t$.
Find. Which of the four can be demodulated by a simple envelope detector (diode, RC time constant), with justification.
Approach. An envelope detector recovers the magnitude of the slowly varying multiplier, i.e. $|x(t)|$, not $x(t)$ itself. So the single criterion is whether $x(t)$ ever changes sign.
State the criterion. Writing $s(t)=x(t)\cos\omega_c t=|x(t)|\cos\!\left(\omega_c t+\phi(t)\right)$ with $\phi=0$ where $x\gt 0$ and $\phi=\pi$ where $x\lt 0$, the envelope is $|x(t)|$. Hence $$\boxed{\ \text{envelope detection recovers }x(t)\iff x(t)\ge 0\ \text{for all }t\ }$$ Every sign reversal of the message appears at the detector as a rectified fold, which is irreversible distortion.
(a) $x=2\cos(2\pi f_1 t)$. The minimum is $-2$, so the message reverses sign twice per cycle. The envelope is $2|\cos(2\pi f_1 t)|$, a full-wave-rectified cosine at twice the message frequency. Not recoverable by envelope detection; coherent (synchronous) detection is required.
(b) $x=\cos(2\pi f_1 t)+\cos(2\pi f_2 t)$. Written as $2\cos\!\left(\pi(f_1-f_2)t\right)\cos\!\left(\pi(f_1+f_2)t\right)$, this is a beat waveform whose minimum is $-2$; it passes through zero at every beat null. Not recoverable.
(c) $x=2+\cos(2\pi f_1 t)$. The DC term dominates: $x_{\min}=2-1=1\gt 0$, so $|x(t)|=x(t)$ everywhere. Recoverable. The envelope reproduces the message with a DC pedestal, removed by the detector output capacitor. Strictly this is conventional AM with modulation index $\mu=\tfrac{1}{2}=50\%$ rather than true DSB-SC, since a carrier term $2\cos\omega_c t$ is transmitted.
(d) $x=2+2\cos(2\pi f_1 t)+\cos(2\pi f_2 t)$. The two tones can align in anti-phase with the pedestal, giving $x_{\min}=2-2-1=-1\lt 0$ whenever $f_1$ and $f_2$ are incommensurate (a numerical sweep over 600 001 samples confirms the minimum reaches $-1$). Because the pedestal is smaller than the summed tone amplitudes the carrier is over-modulated. Not recoverable — raising the DC term above 3 would fix it.
Case (c): the message never crosses zero (minimum +1), so the envelope equals the message and detection is distortion-free.
Case (d): the pedestal of 2 is smaller than the combined tone amplitude of 3, so the message dips to -1 and the envelope detector rectifies (over-modulation).