Question 4 of 6: Three-Phase Synchronous Generator
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Professional Engineers Ontario — 07-Elec-A6 Power Systems and Machines, Spring 2013. Closed-book; five of the six questions constitute a complete paper (all of equal value, 20 marks each). All voltages and currents are rms values; three-phase voltages are line-to-line unless noted otherwise. All six questions are solved below as a complete study resource.
Reference texts. S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill): DC machines (Ch. 9), transformers (Ch. 2), induction machines (Ch. 7), synchronous machines (Ch. 4–5), magnetic circuits (Ch. 1). J. D. Glover, M. S. Sarma & T. J. Overbye, Power System Analysis and Design (Cengage): per-phase and balanced three-phase network analysis (Ch. 2–3). T. Wildi, Electrical Machines, Drives, and Power Systems (Pearson).
Given. A wye-connected round-rotor synchronous generator with negligible armature resistance; the field is fixed so that the no-load terminal voltage is 480 V line-to-line.
Given data
Line voltage (no load)
$V_{L,nl} = 480\ \text{V}$
Synchronous reactance
$X_s = 1.0\ \Omega,\ R_A \approx 0$
Poles / frequency
$P = 6,\ f = 60\ \text{Hz}$
Rated armature current
$I_A = 60\ \text{A}$
Non-copper losses
$P_{loss} = 2.5\ \text{kW}$
Find. Speed; terminal voltage and phasor diagram for 0.8 lag and 0.8 lead; percent regulation for each; efficiency for the lagging case.
Approach. No load with $R_A\approx0$ means $E_A = V_{\phi,nl}$; the field is then held constant, so $|E_A|$ is fixed for both loads. For each power factor, solve $E_A = V_\phi + jX_s I_A$ for the unknown terminal voltage.
Internal voltage from no-load. At no load $I_A = 0$, so with $R_A\approx0$ the internal generated voltage equals the phase voltage:
$$E_A = V_{\phi,nl} = \frac{480}{\sqrt{3}} = 277.1\ \text{V (held constant, field fixed)}.$$
Voltage regulation (c). The no-load terminal voltage is 480 V for both, so
$$\mathrm{VR}_{lag} = \frac{480 - 410.4}{410.4}\times 100 = 17.0\%,\qquad
\mathrm{VR}_{lead} = \frac{480 - 535.1}{535.1}\times 100 = -10.3\%.$$
$$\boxed{\mathrm{VR}_{lag} = +17.0\%,\quad \mathrm{VR}_{lead} = -10.3\%}$$
Efficiency, lagging load (d). With $R_A\approx0$ the copper loss is negligible, so the only losses are the 2.5 kW. Output power is
$$P_{out} = 3\,V_\phi I_A\cos\theta = 3(236.9)(60)(0.8) = 34.1\ \text{kW},$$
$$\eta = \frac{P_{out}}{P_{out}+P_{loss}} = \frac{34\,119}{34\,119 + 2500}.$$
$$\boxed{\eta = 93.2\%}$$
The sign of the regulation tells the whole story: a lagging (inductive) load pulls the terminal voltage down 17 % below its no-load value, while a leading (capacitive) load pushes it up — a negative regulation. This is the armature-reaction behaviour every synchronous machine exhibits, and it is why excitation must be raised to hold voltage under lagging load.