Question 8 of 8: Magnetic field of a monopole above a conducting ground plane
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2014 — 07-Elec-A7 Electromagnetics. Three hours, closed book; one of two approved calculators permitted. Eight questions, all of equal value (20 marks each). The rubric states that any five questions constitute a complete paper and that only the first five presented are marked — all eight are worked here, because the set is a study resource rather than a sat examination. Aids printed on the paper: $\varepsilon_0 = 8.85\times10^{-12}\ \text{F/m}$ and $\mu_0 = 4\pi\times10^{-7}\ \text{H/m}$, from which $\eta_0=\sqrt{\mu_0/\varepsilon_0}\approx 377\ \Omega$ and $c = 3\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$.
Reference texts. D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. (transmission lines, waveguides); M. N. O. Sadiku, Elements of Electromagnetics, 7th ed.; W. H. Hayt and J. A. Buck, Engineering Electromagnetics, 9th ed. (statics, Faraday's law, plane waves); F. T. Ulaby, Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics, 8th ed. (polarisation, radiation); C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed. (short elements, image theory).
Question 8: Magnetic field of a monopole above a conducting ground plane (20 marks)
Given. A short vertical monopole standing on a conducting plane, with one measured far-field power density along the plane to calibrate the radiation.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Element length
$h$
$1\ \text{m}$ (vertical)
Frequency
$f$
$10\ \text{MHz}$ ($\lambda=30\ \text{m}$)
Reference range
$r_1$
$10\ \text{km}$, on the ground plane
Reference power density
$S_1$
$2.62\times10^{-13}\ \text{W/m}^{2}$
Target range
$r_2$
$2\ \text{km}$ (radial)
Target elevation
—
$30^{\circ}$ above the plane
Find. The magnitude and the direction of $\bar{H}$ at the target point.
Monopole on a conducting plane. The in-phase image doubles the field in the upper half space, giving the familiar $\sin\theta$ pattern with its maximum grazing along the plane and a null overhead.
Approach. Recognise the far field of a short vertical element over a conducting plane: $H_\phi\propto\sin\theta/r$ with $\theta$ measured from the vertical axis. Convert the reference power density to $H$, then scale by the range ratio and the pattern factor — no antenna constants are needed.
Field structure of the radiator. With the conducting plane replaced by the in-phase image, the pair radiates into the upper half space as a short dipole: the only far-field components are $E_\theta$ and $H_\phi$, related by $E_\theta=\eta_0H_\phi$, and both vary as $$\left|H_\phi\right|\propto\frac{\sin\theta}{r},\qquad \theta\ \text{measured from the vertical element axis}.$$ At $\lambda=c/f=30\ \text{m}$, a range of 2 km is more than 60 wavelengths, so the far-field form applies at both points.
Calibrate at the reference point. On the ground plane $\theta=90^{\circ}$ and $\sin\theta=1$, the pattern maximum. From the given power density, $$H_1=\sqrt{\frac{S_1}{\eta_0}}=\sqrt{\frac{2.62\times10^{-13}}{377}}=2.636\times10^{-8}\ \text{A/m (rms)},$$ equivalently $E_1=\sqrt{S_1\eta_0}=9.94\ \mu\text{V/m}$.
Pattern factor at the target. An elevation of $30^{\circ}$ above the plane means $\theta=90^{\circ}-30^{\circ}=60^{\circ}$, so $\sin\theta=0.8660$. The range shrinks from 10 km to 2 km, a factor of 5 increase in field.
Scale to the target point. $$H_2=H_1\left(\frac{r_1}{r_2}\right)\sin\theta=\left(2.636\times10^{-8}\right)(5)(0.8660)$$ $$\Rightarrow\;\boxed{\left|\bar{H}\right|=1.142\times10^{-7}\ \text{A/m}=114.2\ \text{nA/m (rms)}} ,$$ i.e. 161.5 nA/m peak, with $E_\theta=\eta_0H_\phi=43.0\ \mu\text{V/m}$ and a power density of $4.91\ \text{pW/m}^{2}$.
Direction of the vector. $\bar{H}$ lies along $\hat{\phi}$: it is horizontal, tangent to the horizontal circle of radius $r\sin\theta$ centred on the element's axis, and therefore perpendicular to the vertical plane containing the element and the observation point. Its sense is fixed by $\hat{\theta}\times\hat{\phi}=\hat{r}$, so that $\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H}$ points away from the antenna: looking down on the antenna from above, $\bar{H}$ circulates counter-clockwise about the element when the current flows upward.
Independent check from first principles. Using the image-doubled short-element result $E_\theta=\eta_0kIh\sin\theta/(2\pi r)$ with $k=2\pi/\lambda=0.2094\ \text{rad/m}$, the reference reading implies $I_{rms}=7.91\ \text{mA}$. Recomputing at $r=2\ \text{km}$, $\theta=60^{\circ}$ returns $43.0\ \mu\text{V/m}$, confirming the scaling. The radiated power follows two ways and agrees: $I_{rms}^{2}R_r$ with $R_r=160\pi^{2}(h/\lambda)^{2}=1.755\ \Omega$ gives $110\ \mu\text{W}$, as does the hemispherical integral $(4\pi/3)S_1r_1^{2}$.
The answer needs nothing about the element beyond its pattern shape, because one measured field value calibrates the whole product of current, length and frequency. That is the practical value of quoting a reference field strength at a reference distance, as broadcast licences do. Note also where the maximum of this antenna lies: a vertical element has a null along its own axis, so the strongest signal grazes along the ground plane at every azimuth and the $30^{\circ}$ elevation point is already 1.25 dB down on the pattern peak. The image is what makes the ground plane useful — it doubles the field above the plane and doubles the radiation resistance, which is why a quarter-wave monopole behaves like a half-wave dipole with half the radiation resistance.
Final results
Quantity asked
Result
Wavelength
$30\ \text{m}$
Reference field on the plane at 10 km
$26.36\ \text{nA/m}$ ($9.94\ \mu\text{V/m}$)
Polar angle at the target
$\theta=60^{\circ}$, $\sin\theta=0.866$
Magnitude $\left|\bar{H}\right|$ at the target
$114.2\ \text{nA/m}$ rms (161.5 nA/m peak)
Direction of $\bar{H}$
$\hat{\phi}$ — horizontal, azimuthal, normal to the vertical plane through the element and the point