NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-A7 Electromagnetics · May 2016

Question 6 of 8: Line parameters of a parallel-ribbon line

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2016 — 07-Elec-A7 Electromagnetics. Three hours, closed book; one of two approved calculators permitted. Eight questions, all of equal value (20 marks each). The rubric states that any five questions constitute a complete paper and that only the first five presented are marked — all eight are worked here, because this set is a study resource rather than a sat examination.

Constants. The paper prints $\varepsilon_0 = 8.85\times10^{-12}\ \text{F/m}$ and $\mu_0 = 4\pi\times10^{-7}\ \text{H/m}$ as aids. Its own numbers imply the classroom values $c = 3.00\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $\eta_0 = 120\pi = 377\ \Omega$: the offset in Question 3 is exactly $\lambda/8$ only if $\lambda = 3.00\ \text{cm}$ at 10 GHz, and the 2.25 cm guide of Question 4 places a cutoff exactly on 20 GHz only for the same value. Those are the constants used throughout; the more precise values shift every field and guide wavelength here by less than 0.3 %, and the one place where the difference matters is flagged in Question 4.

Reference texts. D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed., §2.1–2.7 (transmission-line theory, standing waves, impedance transformation). M. N. O. Sadiku, Elements of Electromagnetics, 7th ed., ch. 11 (transmission lines) and ch. 12 (waveguides). W. H. Hayt and J. A. Buck, Engineering Electromagnetics, 9th ed., ch. 10–11 (transmission lines, uniform plane waves). F. T. Ulaby and U. Ravaioli, Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics, 8th ed., ch. 2 and ch. 7 (line transients, wave polarisation). C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed., ch. 4 (the infinitesimal/short current element).

Question 6: Line parameters of a parallel-ribbon line (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A parallel-strip (ribbon) line: two flat conductors of width $w = 2\ \text{cm}$ separated by a dielectric sheet $d = 0.5\ \text{mm}$ thick with $\varepsilon_r = 2.25$. The sheet cross-section quoted in the question, 2 cm by 0.5 mm, confirms that the dielectric exactly fills the space between the ribbons. Since $w/d = 40 \gg 1$, neglecting fringing is well justified.

Find. The distributed capacitance and inductance per metre, the characteristic impedance, and the propagation velocity.

dielectric, ε(r) = 2.25metal ribbonmetal ribbonw = 2 cmd = 0.5 mmEParallel-plate model (fringing neglected): w >> dC' = 796.5 pF/m L' = 31.42 nH/mCurrent returns on the opposite ribbon, so the flux is confined to the same d × w rectangle.
Figure 6.1 — cross-section of the ribbon line. Both the electric field between the plates and the magnetic flux linking them are confined to the same $d \times w$ rectangle.

Approach. Treat the cross-section as an ideal parallel-plate capacitor and as an ideal flat current sheet pair, then combine the two distributed parameters in the standard lossless-line relations.

  1. Capacitance per metre. A parallel-plate capacitor of plate area $w \times 1\ \text{m}$ and separation $d$: $$C' = \frac{\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r w}{d} = \frac{(8.85\times10^{-12})(2.25)(0.02)}{5\times10^{-4}} = \boxed{796.5\ \text{pF/m}}$$
  2. Inductance per metre. Equal and opposite sheet currents confine a uniform $B$ to the same rectangle, and the flux linked per metre of length gives $$L' = \frac{\mu_0 d}{w} = \frac{(4\pi\times10^{-7})(5\times10^{-4})}{0.02} = \boxed{31.42\ \text{nH/m}}$$
  3. Characteristic impedance. For a lossless line $$Z_0 = \sqrt{\frac{L'}{C'}} = \sqrt{\frac{3.1416\times10^{-8}}{7.965\times10^{-10}}} = \boxed{6.280\ \Omega}$$
  4. Propagation velocity. $$v_p = \frac{1}{\sqrt{L'C'}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2.5023\times10^{-17}}} = \boxed{2.00\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}}$$

Both results carry a useful structural check. Substituting the expressions for $C'$ and $L'$ into the two formulas gives $Z_0 = (\eta_0/\sqrt{\varepsilon_r})(d/w) = (377/1.5)(0.025) = 6.28\ \Omega$ and $v_p = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r} = c/\sqrt{\varepsilon_r} = c/1.5$. The geometry cancels out of the velocity entirely, as it must for any TEM line: the wave travels at the speed of light in the filling material regardless of the shape of the conductors, and only the impedance depends on the cross-section.

The very low characteristic impedance is not an error but the direct consequence of the aspect ratio. A line 40 times wider than it is thick has a large capacitance and a small inductance per metre, and $Z_0$ falls in proportion to $d/w$. Practical ribbon lines of this kind are used where low impedance and tight field confinement matter — power-distribution bus bars and printed-circuit power planes behave in exactly this way — rather than for signal feeds, which need impedances closer to 50 ohms.

Final results
QuantityValue
Capacitance per metre$\mathbf{C' = 796.5\ \text{pF/m}}$
Inductance per metre$\mathbf{L' = 31.42\ \text{nH/m}}$
Characteristic impedance$\mathbf{Z_0 = 6.280\ \Omega}$
Propagation velocity$\mathbf{v_p = 2.00\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}}$
Equivalent forms$Z_0 = (\eta_0/\sqrt{\varepsilon_r})(d/w)$, $v_p = c/\sqrt{\varepsilon_r}$