Question 6 of 8: Horizontal magnetic field above a semicircular loop fed by two infinite straight wires
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2017 — 16-Elec-A7 Electromagnetics. Three hours, closed book (one Casio or Sharp approved calculator). Eight questions of equal value; the rubric states that any five questions constitute a complete paper and that only the first five answered will be marked. All eight are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a sitting. Aids printed on the paper: $\varepsilon_0 = 8.85 \times 10^{-12}\ \text{F/m}$ and $\mu_0 = 4\pi \times 10^{-7}\ \text{H/m}$.
Reference texts. D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. (transmission-line transients, stub networks, waveguides); W. H. Hayt and J. A. Buck, Engineering Electromagnetics, 9th ed. (plane waves, polarisation, Biot–Savart, inductance); M. N. O. Sadiku, Elements of Electromagnetics, 7th ed. (magnetostatics, guided waves); F. T. Ulaby and U. Ravaioli, Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics, 8th ed. (wave polarisation, radiation); C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed. (short-element fields).
Constants used throughout. The aid sheet's $\varepsilon_0$ and $\mu_0$ give $c = 2.9986 \times 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $\eta_0 = 376.82\ \Omega$, while every round figure the paper quotes (10 km at $3 \times 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$, 300 and 600 MHz, 10 GHz giving a 3 cm wavelength) is built on $c = 3.00 \times 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $\eta_0 = 120\pi = 376.99\ \Omega$. Those are the values used below; the two sets differ by less than 0.05 % and no answer or conclusion changes.
Question 6: Horizontal magnetic field above a semicircular loop fed by two infinite straight wires
Given. A horizontal circuit made of one semicircular arc plus two semi-infinite parallel feeders attached to its ends.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Current
$I$
$2\ \text{A}$
Semicircle diameter
$2R$
$50\ \text{cm}$
Arc radius
$R$
$25\ \text{cm} = 0.25\ \text{m}$
Height of the field point above the midpoint
$h$
$25\ \text{cm} = 0.25\ \text{m}$
Feeders
—
two semi-infinite straights, perpendicular to the diameter
Sense of circulation
—
clockwise viewed from above
Find. The magnitude and direction of the horizontal part of $\mathbf{B}$ at the point $25\ \text{cm}$ vertically above the midpoint of the diameter.
Figure 6.1 — plan view of the arc and its two feeders (left), and the section on the perpendicular bisector showing P and the resultant field (right).
Approach. Integrate Biot–Savart separately over the arc and over each semi-infinite feeder. The field point lies on the symmetry plane of the two feeders, so their horizontal contributions cancel and only the arc leaves a horizontal field.
Set the geometry and the sense. Use east–north–up coordinates with the diameter along the east–west line, the arc bulging north, and the feeders running south to infinity from the arc ends at $(\pm R, 0, 0)$. Viewed from above, clockwise means the current runs north up the western feeder, over the crown of the arc from west to east, then south down the eastern feeder. The field point is $P = (0, 0, h)$.
Integrate over the arc. Every element of the arc is the same distance $r_0 = \sqrt{R^{2} + h^{2}}$ from $P$. Parameterising by the polar angle and carrying out $d\mathbf{B} = (\mu_0 I/4\pi)\,d\boldsymbol{\ell} \times \hat{r}/r^{2}$ over the half turn, the east–west components cancel by symmetry while the other two survive:$$B_{h,arc} = \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi}\,\frac{2Rh}{(R^{2}+h^{2})^{3/2}}, \qquad B_{z,arc} = \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi}\,\frac{\pi R^{2}}{(R^{2}+h^{2})^{3/2}}$$Note that a semicircle, unlike a full loop, leaves a transverse component: the two halves that would cancel it are simply not there.
Evaluate the arc terms. With $h = R$ the horizontal term collapses to a compact closed form,$$B_{h,arc} = \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\sqrt{2}\,\pi R} = \frac{4\pi \times 10^{-7} \times 2}{4\sqrt{2}\,\pi \times 0.25} = 5.657 \times 10^{-7}\ \text{T} = 0.566\ \mu\text{T}$$directed horizontally along the perpendicular bisector of the diameter and pointing away from the arc (due south, with the arc to the north). The vertical term is $B_{z,arc} = 0.889\ \mu\text{T}$ downward, the downward sense following from the right-hand rule applied to a clockwise circulation.
Treat the two feeders. Each is a semi-infinite straight whose perpendicular foot from $P$ falls exactly at its own end, so its field magnitude is half the infinite-wire value, $\mu_0 I/(4\pi r_0) = 0.566\ \mu\text{T}$, resolving into$$\mathbf{B}_{feeder} = \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi}\,\frac{(\pm h,\ 0,\ -R)}{R^{2}+h^{2}} \;\Rightarrow\; 0.400\ \mu\text{T horizontal},\ 0.400\ \mu\text{T down each}$$The signs of the horizontal parts are opposite because $P$ lies on the plane midway between the two feeders and they carry opposite currents, so those two contributions cancel exactly. Their vertical parts add.
Collect the horizontal answer. Only the arc survives horizontally, so$$\boxed{B_{horizontal} = \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\sqrt{2}\,\pi R} = 0.566\ \mu\text{T}}$$directed horizontally along the perpendicular bisector of the diameter, pointing away from the arc — i.e. due south if the arc bulges north.
Cross-check with the full field. The vertical components sum to $0.889 + 2 \times 0.400 = 1.689\ \mu\text{T}$ downward, giving a resultant $|\mathbf{B}| = \sqrt{0.566^{2} + 1.689^{2}} = 1.781\ \mu\text{T}$ dipping $71.5^\circ$ below the horizontal. A direct numerical Biot–Savart integration along the whole conductor path reproduces both the magnitude and the sense of every component, which is the cheapest guard against a handedness slip.
Check: the paper fixes the sense of circulation but not the compass orientation of the diameter, so the answer is stated relative to the geometry: the horizontal field lies along the perpendicular bisector of the diameter and points away from the arc. Placing the arc to the north makes that due south; rotate the layout and the answer rotates with it. Reversing the circulation to anticlockwise would flip both components, sending the horizontal field toward the arc and the vertical field upward.
Final results
Quantity asked
Result
Horizontal field (the quantity asked)
$0.566\ \mu\text{T}$
Direction
along the perpendicular bisector, away from the arc (due south here)