Question 6 of 7: Parallel-plate capacitor and displacement current
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 16-Elec-A7 Electromagnetics, December 2019 — 3 hours, closed book, approved calculator only. Seven questions of equal value (20 marks each); the paper states that five completed questions constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here, because the set is intended as a study resource.
Reference texts (22-Elec-A7 Electromagnetics). F. T. Ulaby & U. Ravaioli, Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics, 8th ed.; M. N. O. Sadiku, Elements of Electromagnetics, 7th ed.; W. H. Hayt & J. A. Buck, Engineering Electromagnetics, 9th ed.; D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed.; C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed.
Constants used throughout. $c = 3.00\times 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$, $\varepsilon_0 = 8.854\times 10^{-12}\ \text{F/m}$, $\mu_0 = 4\pi\times 10^{-7}\ \text{H/m}$, $\eta_0 = 376.7\ \Omega$. Where a boundary case could turn on the choice between $c = 3\times 10^{8}$ and $c = 2.998\times 10^{8}$ m/s, both readings are stated.
Figure reading. In Figure 1(b) the maxima sit at z = 0, 1.5 and 3.0 m and the minima at z = 0.75 and 2.25 m, so the wavelength is 3.00 m. Three independent checks confirm that reading — the quarter-wave maximum-to-minimum spacing, the fact that the stated 3.75 m line is then exactly 1.25 wavelengths, and the fact that z = l then lands on a voltage minimum where the quarter-wave transformer result must give $Z_{\text{in}} = Z_0/S$.
Question 6: Parallel-plate capacitor and displacement current (20 marks)
Given. A square parallel-plate capacitor with a lossless high-permittivity filling and a plate spacing sixteen times smaller than the plate edge, so fringing is negligible.
$5\ \text{V}$ rms (frequency not stated — see below)
Find. The capacitance; the electric field and flux density under 5 V DC; the plate surface charge density; and the rms displacement and conduction currents under a 5 V rms sinusoid.
Parallel-plate geometry (cross-section). E is uniform and normal to the plates; the bound and free charge layers sit on the conductor faces.
Approach. Use the ideal parallel-plate model for $C$, get E from the uniform-field assumption, apply the constitutive relation for D, use the conductor boundary condition for $\rho_s$, and finally separate the two current mechanisms in Ampère's law.
Capacitance of the parallel-plate geometry. With $w/d = 4/0.25 = 16$, fringing contributes a fraction of a percent and the ideal formula applies: $$C = \frac{\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r A}{d} = \frac{(8.854\times 10^{-12})(10.6)(16\times 10^{-6})}{2.5\times 10^{-4}} = \boxed{6.01\ \text{pF}}.$$
Electric field under the DC potential. The field between closely spaced plates is uniform and normal to them, so the potential is simply $V = Ed$: $$E = \frac{V}{d} = \frac{5}{2.5\times 10^{-4}} = \boxed{2.00\times 10^{4}\ \text{V/m} = 20.0\ \text{kV/m}}$$ directed from the positive plate to the negative plate.
Electric flux density. The constitutive relation for a linear isotropic dielectric gives $$D = \varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r E = (8.854\times 10^{-12})(10.6)(2.00\times 10^{4}) = \boxed{1.877\ \mu\text{C/m}^{2}}$$ in the same direction as E. Note that D is set by the free charge alone, which is why it carries the permittivity while E does not.
Surface charge density on the plates. At the face of a perfect conductor the boundary condition is $\rho_s = \mathbf{D}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{n}} = D_n$, so $$\boxed{\rho_s = \pm 1.877\ \mu\text{C/m}^{2}}$$ positive on the plate held at the higher potential and negative on the other. Cross-checking through the lumped model, the stored charge is $Q = CV = (6.01\ \text{pF})(5\ \text{V}) = 30.0\ \text{pC}$, and $Q/A = 30.0\times 10^{-12}/16\times 10^{-6} = 1.877\ \mu\text{C/m}^{2}$ — identical, as it must be.
(d)(i) RMS displacement current. The displacement current is the surface integral of $\partial\mathbf{D}/\partial t$ across the gap. For a sinusoid, differentiation in the phasor domain multiplies by $j\omega$, so $$I_d = \left|\int_S \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t}\cdot d\mathbf{S}\right| = \omega\,\frac{\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r A}{d}\,V_{\text{rms}} = \omega C V_{\text{rms}} = 2\pi f\,(6.01\ \text{pF})(5\ \text{V}).$$ The question does not state the source frequency, so the answer is necessarily a function of it: $$\boxed{I_d = 2\pi f C V_{\text{rms}} = \left(1.887\times 10^{-10}\ \text{A per Hz}\right)\times f}$$ which evaluates to 188.7 $\mu$A at 1 MHz and 188.7 mA at 1 GHz. Equivalently the displacement current density is $J_d = \omega\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r V_{\text{rms}}/d$, and $J_dA$ reproduces the same number.
(d)(ii) RMS conduction current. Conduction current is $\mathbf{J}_c = \sigma\mathbf{E}$, and the dielectric is stated to be lossless: $\sigma = 0$. Therefore $$\boxed{I_c = \sigma E A = 0\ \text{A}}$$ no matter what the frequency or the applied voltage is. This is the whole point of Maxwell's addition to Ampère's law: a conduction current $I_d$ flows in the external leads and stops dead at the plate, yet Ampère's circuital law must give the same answer for a surface passing through the wire and for one passing between the plates. The displacement current supplies exactly the missing term, so the lead current equals $I_d$ even though no charge crosses the gap. A real capacitor with a small loss tangent $\tan\delta$ would carry $I_c = \tan\delta\cdot I_d$; here $\tan\delta = 0$ by hypothesis.
Check: the source frequency is not given. Part (d) specifies only “a 5 Vrms sinusoidal source”, with no frequency, and the displacement current is directly proportional to frequency. The answer is therefore quoted symbolically as $I_d = 2\pi f C V_{\text{rms}}$ with two worked illustrative values; per the paper's own note 1 the assumption is stated rather than a frequency being invented. The conduction-current answer is frequency-independent and is unaffected.