22-Elec-B3 Digital Communications Systems · May 2018
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Examinations — May 2018, 16-Elec-B3 Digital Communications Systems. Three hours, closed book; a PEO-approved non-programmable calculator is permitted. Five questions of 25 marks each are printed; any four constitute a complete paper worth 100 marks, and only the first four appearing in the answer book are marked. All five questions are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than a marked script. Note 1 of the cover page invites the candidate to submit a clear statement of any assumption made where a question is open to interpretation — that licence is used explicitly in Question 1.
Reference texts.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Video signal bandwidth (part a) | $B$ | 5 MHz |
| PCM resolution (part b) | $n$ | 16 bits/sample |
| PCM resolution (part d) | $n$ | 24 bits/sample |
| Signal range (part d) | $V_{pp}$ | −5 V to +5 V, i.e. 10 V peak-to-peak |
Find. (a) the minimum sampling rate; (b) an explanation of PCM and the resulting bit rate; (c) a concrete example of aliasing; (d) the maximum quantisation error of the 24-bit converter; (e) one reason MPEG video needs far less rate than raw PCM.
Approach. Apply the Nyquist criterion to fix the sampling rate, multiply by the word length for the PCM rate, divide the input range by the number of quantisation levels for the step size and halve it for the worst-case error, and answer (c) and (e) from the underlying sampling theory and source-coding principles.
The everyday visual counterpart is the wagon-wheel effect in film: a wheel rotating at just under one spoke-spacing per frame appears to rotate slowly backwards, because a 24 frame/s camera undersamples the rotation. The engineering lesson in both cases is the same — aliasing must be prevented before sampling by an analogue anti-aliasing low-pass filter, because no amount of digital processing afterwards can undo it.
| Result | Value |
|---|---|
| (a) Minimum sampling frequency | 10 MHz (10 Msample/s) |
| (b) PCM data rate at 16 bits/sample | 160 Mbit/s |
| (c) Aliasing example | 7 kHz tone sampled at 8 kHz reappears as a 1 kHz tone (also: the wagon-wheel effect on film) |
| (d) Quantisation step, $\Delta = 10/2^{24}$ | 596.0 nV |
| (d) Maximum quantisation error, $\Delta/2$ | 0.298 µV (298 nV) |
| (d) Corresponding SQNR, $6.02n + 1.76$ | 146.2 dB |
| (e) Reason MPEG is smaller | Lossy removal of spatial, temporal and perceptual redundancy, which PCM does not exploit at all |