Question 1 of 5: MOSFET Differential Pair with Current‑Source Loads
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams December 2013, 07‑Elec‑B5 Advanced Electronics — 3 hours, CLOSED BOOK, any non‑communicating calculator permitted. Answer all FIVE (5) questions; all questions are worth 20 marks each. Op‑amps may be assumed ideal and supply voltages ±15 V unless stated otherwise; ground and chassis are common in every schematic.
Reference texts. A. S. Sedra and K. C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed. (Oxford) — Ch. 8 (differential and multistage amplifiers), Ch. 10 (frequency response), Ch. 13 (signal generators and waveform shaping), Ch. 17 (power amplifiers and regulators); B. Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits, 2nd ed. (McGraw‑Hill) — Ch. 4 (differential amplifiers) and Ch. 6 (frequency response). Both are on the Engineers Canada / EGBC reading list for this examination code.
Question 1: MOSFET Differential Pair with Current‑Source Loads (20 marks)
Given. A matched NMOS source‑coupled pair M1–M2 biased by a tail source Ibias and loaded by two matched PMOS current sources M3–M4 whose gates share the fixed bias Vbias; the output is taken single‑ended at the drain of M2.
Given data
Transconductance parameter $K$
$0.5\ \text{mA/V}^{2}$
Threshold voltage $V_{TH}$
$1\ \text{V}$
Channel‑length modulation $\lambda$
$0.02\ \text{V}^{-1}$
Tail current $I_{bias}$
$1\ \text{mA}$
Load gate bias $V_{bias}$
$6\ \text{V}$
Supplies $V_{DD}=|-V_{SS}|$
$10\ \text{V}$
Find. The single‑ended differential gain $v_{OUT}/v_{IN}$, the common‑mode input resistance $R_{icm}$, the common‑mode input range, and the common‑mode rejection ratio expressed in dB.
Question 1 — NMOS differential pair M1/M2 with tail source Ibias, loaded by the matched PMOS current sources M3/M4 biased at Vbias. The output is single‑ended at the M2/M4 drain node.
Approach. Fix the operating point from the saturation law, extract $g_m$ and $r_o$, then use the differential half‑circuit for the gain, the saturation‑edge conditions on M1/M2 and on the tail for the input range, and the common‑mode half‑circuit (degeneration $2R_{SS}$) for the rejection ratio.
Part (a) — split the tail current between the two halves. The pair is symmetric, so each input device carries half the tail current, $I_{D1}=I_{D2}=I_{bias}/2=0.5\ \text{mA}$. Inverting the saturation law $I_D=\tfrac12 K V_{ov}^{2}$ gives the overdrive $V_{ov}=\sqrt{2I_D/K}=\sqrt{2(0.5)/0.5}=1.414\ \text{V}$, so $V_{GS}=V_{TH}+V_{ov}=2.414\ \text{V}$.
Extract the small‑signal parameters. $g_m=K V_{ov}=\sqrt{2KI_D}=\sqrt{2(0.5\times10^{-3})(0.5\times10^{-3})}=0.707\ \text{mA/V}$ and $r_o=1/(\lambda I_D)=1/(0.02\times0.5\times10^{-3})=100\ \text{k}\Omega$. M3 and M4 carry the same $0.5\ \text{mA}$ and share $\lambda$, so $r_{o3}=r_{o4}=100\ \text{k}\Omega$ as well.
Load the output node. M3 and M4 have their gates tied to a fixed potential, so each behaves as a current source of output resistance $r_{o4}$; the drain of M2 therefore sees $R_{out}=r_{o2}\parallel r_{o4}=100\parallel100=50\ \text{k}\Omega$.
Apply the differential half‑circuit. Only half of $v_{IN}$ appears on each gate, so the single‑ended output swings by $\tfrac12 g_m R_{out}$ per volt of differential input: $$\frac{v_{OUT}}{v_{IN}}=\tfrac12 g_m\left(r_{o2}\parallel r_{o4}\right)=\tfrac12(0.707\times10^{-3})(50\times10^{3})=\boxed{+17.7\ \text{V/V}\quad(24.9\ \text{dB})}$$ The sign is positive because the output node is the drain of M2, whose gate is driven by $-v_{IN}/2$; the inverting stage and the inverting drive cancel.
Part (b) — look into the gates. The inputs land directly on the gate oxide of M1 and M2. A MOSFET gate passes no d.c. current, so no current is drawn when both gates are moved together and $$R_{icm}=\boxed{\infty\ (\text{ideally})}$$ In practice the limit is gate leakage (fractions of a pA, i.e. $10^{12}\ \Omega$ and above) shunted at signal frequencies by the common‑mode input capacitance $C_{gs}+C_{gb}$ of the two devices — the resistance is finite only in the sense that any real insulator is.
Part (c) — upper end of the common‑mode range. The PMOS loads set the drain potential. Their overdrive is fixed by the printed bias: $|V_{ov3}|=V_{DD}-V_{bias}-|V_{TH}|=10-6-1=3\ \text{V}$, so M3/M4 stay saturated only while their drains sit at or below $V_{DD}-|V_{ov3}|=7\ \text{V}$. M1/M2 remain saturated while $V_D\ge V_{ICM}-V_{TH}$, hence $$V_{ICM,\max}=V_{DD}-|V_{ov3}|+V_{TH}=10-3+1=\boxed{+8.0\ \text{V}}$$
Lower end of the common‑mode range. Coming down, the common source node follows the inputs at $V_{ICM}-V_{GS}$ and must leave the tail source enough compliance: $V_{ICM,\min}=-V_{SS}+V_{CS}+V_{GS}$. Realising the tail as one saturated NMOS carrying $I_{bias}$ needs $V_{CS}=\sqrt{2I_{bias}/K}=\sqrt{2(1)/0.5}=2\ \text{V}$, giving $V_{ICM,\min}=-10+2+2.414=\boxed{-5.59\ \text{V}}$, i.e. a usable window $-5.59\ \text{V}\le V_{ICM}\le+8.0\ \text{V}$ (13.6 V wide). With the idealised tail actually drawn, $V_{CS}=0$ and the floor drops to $-7.59\ \text{V}$.
Part (d) — put a resistance on the tail. Common‑mode rejection is finite only because the tail source is not ideal. Modelling it as the same saturated NMOS carrying $I_{bias}$, $R_{SS}=1/(\lambda I_{bias})=1/(0.02\times10^{-3})=50\ \text{k}\Omega$.
Common‑mode half‑circuit. Driving both gates together, each half is a source‑degenerated stage with $2R_{SS}$ in its source and $r_{o4}$ as its drain load: $$A_{cm}=\frac{-g_m r_{o4}}{1+2g_mR_{SS}+\dfrac{r_{o4}+2R_{SS}}{r_{o2}}}=\frac{-70.7}{1+70.7+2}=-0.959$$ Degeneration has cut the transconductance by a factor of about 72, which is the whole mechanism of rejection.
Form the ratio. $$\text{CMRR}=\left|\frac{A_d}{A_{cm}}\right|=\frac{17.68}{0.959}=18.4\;\Longrightarrow\;\text{CMRR}_{\text{dB}}=20\log_{10}(18.4)=\boxed{25.3\ \text{dB}}$$ The frequently quoted shortcut $\text{CMRR}\approx g_mR_{SS}=35.4$ (31.0 dB) is optimistic here because it assumes the same drain load in both modes, whereas the differential gain is loaded by $r_{o2}\parallel r_{o4}=50\ \text{k}\Omega$ and the common‑mode gain by $r_{o4}=100\ \text{k}\Omega$ alone.
Final results
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Bias current per device
$I_{D}$
$0.5\ \text{mA}$
Overdrive / transconductance
$V_{ov}$, $g_m$
$1.414\ \text{V}$, $0.707\ \text{mA/V}$
Output resistance per device
$r_o$
$100\ \text{k}\Omega$
(a) Differential gain, single‑ended
$v_{OUT}/v_{IN}$
$+17.7\ \text{V/V}$ (24.9 dB)
(b) Common‑mode input resistance
$R_{icm}$
$\infty$ (insulated gate)
(c) Common‑mode input range
$V_{ICM}$
$-5.59\ \text{V}$ to $+8.0\ \text{V}$
(d) Common‑mode gain
$A_{cm}$
$-0.959\ \text{V/V}$
(d) Common‑mode rejection ratio
CMRR
$18.4$, i.e. $25.3\ \text{dB}$
Check — two assumptions are stated explicitly, as the paper’s own instruction 1 invites. (i) The tail is drawn as an ideal current source; taken literally that makes $A_{cm}=0$ and CMRR infinite, so part (d) would carry no marks. It is therefore read as a single saturated NMOS passing $I_{bias}$ with the paper’s own $\lambda$, giving $R_{SS}=1/(\lambda I_{bias})=50\ \text{k}\Omega$; the same assumption fixes the lower end of the common‑mode range. (ii) M3/M4 are taken to operate in saturation carrying $I_{bias}/2$. Strictly, $V_{bias}=6\ \text{V}$ gives them $|V_{ov}|=3\ \text{V}$, which in saturation would pass $\tfrac12 K|V_{ov}|^{2}=2.25\ \text{mA}$ each — more than the tail can supply — so a physically balanced circuit needs $V_{bias}=V_{DD}-V_{GS}=7.59\ \text{V}$. The printed $V_{bias}$ does its real work in part (c), where it sets $|V_{ov3}|$ and hence the top of the common‑mode range.