22-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering · December 2019
Question 1 of 6: Per-unit analysis of a plant distribution system
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams December 2019, 16-Elec-B7 Power Systems
Engineering — open book, 3 hours, six questions of 20 marks each. The rubric states that
"any five questions constitute a complete paper" and that "all questions are of equal value";
because this set is a study resource, all six questions are solved in full.
Reference texts. M. E. El-Hawary, Electrical Power Systems: Design and
Analysis, rev. ed. (IEEE Press/Wiley) — the syllabus text for this exam code;
J. D. Glover, M. S. Sarma & T. J. Overbye, Power System Analysis and Design, 6th ed.
— Ch. 3 (per-unit and transformers), Ch. 4–5 (line parameters and models), Ch. 6
(power flow), Ch. 8–9 (symmetrical components and unsymmetrical faults), Ch. 11 (transient
stability); S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed., Ch. 4–5
(synchronous machines); CAN/CSA-C22.3 No. 1 Overhead Systems and CAN/CSA-C22.1
Canadian Electrical Code, Part I for Canadian installation practice.
Question 1: Per-unit analysis of a plant distribution system (20 marks)
300 kVA, 12.5 kV / 600 V, $X=0.10$ pu (on its own rating)
Motor M1
125 hp, $\eta=85.4\ \%$, $\mathrm{pf}=0.8$ lagging, 1 hp = 746 W
Load L2 (resistance heating)
150 kW at unity power factor
Load L1
disconnected (spare feeder)
Bus voltage
600 V (rated), i.e. $V=1.0\angle 0^\circ$ pu
Find. (a) the high-voltage base current and base impedance; (b) the transformer
and motor per-unit impedances on the chosen base; (c) the actual primary current in amperes with
L1 out of service; and (d) the largest unity-power-factor load that L1 could carry before T1
reaches its 300 kVA nameplate.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure Q1 — single-line diagram of the plant distribution system, redrawn from the examination paper. The delta winding of T1 faces the utility; the wye winding feeds the 600 V plant bus. See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Fix the base set from the low-voltage side, transfer the bases
through the transformer turns ratio, convert each nameplate impedance to the common base, then work
the load flow in per unit and convert the single answer that is wanted in amperes at the end.
Part (a) — carry the base voltage through the transformer ratio.
Bases transform exactly as rated quantities do, so the high-voltage base voltage is the low-voltage
base multiplied by the nameplate ratio. Because 600 V was chosen as the low-voltage base and the
transformer is rated 12.5 kV/600 V, the ratio is unity times the nameplate:
$$V_{base,HV}=V_{base,LV}\times\frac{12.5\ \text{kV}}{600\ \text{V}}=600\times\frac{12500}{600}
=12\,500\ \text{V}$$
The base power is the same at every voltage level in a per-unit study.
Compute the high-voltage base current and base impedance. For a three-phase
base defined on the total power and the line-to-line voltage,
$$I_{base}=\frac{S_{base}}{\sqrt{3}\,V_{base}}=\frac{500\,000}{\sqrt{3}\times 12\,500}
=23.094\ \text{A}, \qquad
Z_{base}=\frac{V_{base}^{2}}{S_{base}}=\frac{(12\,500)^{2}}{500\,000}=312.5\ \Omega$$
so that
$$\boxed{I_{base,HV}=23.09\ \text{A}\ ,\qquad Z_{base,HV}=312.5\ \Omega}$$
The corresponding low-voltage figures, needed later as a cross-check, are
$I_{base,LV}=500\,000/(\sqrt{3}\times 600)=481.13$ A and
$Z_{base,LV}=600^{2}/500\,000=0.72\ \Omega$. Note that the ratio
$I_{base,LV}/I_{base,HV}=481.13/23.094=20.83$ is exactly the turns ratio, as it must be.
Part (b) — move the transformer reactance onto the study base. A
per-unit impedance changes base by the ratio of the powers and the inverse square of the voltages:
$$X_{new}=X_{old}\left(\frac{S_{base,new}}{S_{base,old}}\right)
\left(\frac{V_{base,old}}{V_{base,new}}\right)^{2}
=0.10\times\frac{500}{300}\times\left(\frac{600}{600}\right)^{2}$$
The voltage bases coincide with the nameplate voltages, so only the power ratio acts:
$$\boxed{X_{T1}=j0.1667\ \text{pu on }500\ \text{kVA}}$$
In ohms referred to the 600 V side this is $0.1667\times 0.72=0.120\ \Omega$, and referred to the
12.5 kV side, $0.1667\times 312.5=52.08\ \Omega$.
Convert the motor nameplate into an electrical loading. The horsepower rating
is mechanical output; the electrical input is larger by the efficiency, and the apparent
power is larger again by the power factor:
$$P_{out}=125\times 746=93\,250\ \text{W},\qquad
P_{in}=\frac{P_{out}}{\eta}=\frac{93\,250}{0.854}=109\,192\ \text{W}$$
$$S_{M1}=\frac{P_{in}}{\mathrm{pf}}=\frac{109\,192}{0.8}=136\,490\ \text{VA}
=136.49\ \text{kVA at }\cos^{-1}0.8=36.87^\circ\ \text{lagging}$$
so the motor draws $Q_{M1}=136.49\times 0.6=81.89$ kVAr.
Express the motor as a per-unit impedance at rated bus voltage. A constant-power
load seen at a known voltage is equivalent to the impedance that would draw the same complex power,
$Z=V^{2}/S^{*}$. In per unit, with $V=1.0\angle 0^\circ$ and
$S_{M1}=136.49/500=0.27298\angle 36.87^\circ$ pu,
$$Z_{M1}=\frac{|V|^{2}}{S_{M1}^{*}}
=\frac{1.0}{0.27298\angle-36.87^\circ}=3.6633\angle 36.87^\circ\ \text{pu}$$
$$\boxed{Z_{M1}=2.931+j2.198\ \text{pu}\quad(3.663\angle 36.87^\circ\ \text{pu})}$$
Multiplying by $Z_{base,LV}=0.72\ \Omega$ gives $2.110+j1.583\ \Omega$ per phase, wye-equivalent, at
600 V. For completeness the heating load L2, at $150/500=0.30$ pu and unity power factor, is the
pure resistance $Z_{L2}=1/0.30=3.333$ pu.
Part (c) — add the connected loads in complex power. With L1 open the
transformer carries only M1 and L2. Real and reactive powers add arithmetically at a common bus:
$$P_{tot}=109.19+150.00=259.19\ \text{kW},\qquad Q_{tot}=81.89+0=81.89\ \text{kVAr}$$
$$S_{tot}=\sqrt{P_{tot}^{2}+Q_{tot}^{2}}=\sqrt{259.19^{2}+81.89^{2}}=271.82\ \text{kVA}$$
at a plant power factor of $259.19/271.82=0.9535$ lagging, i.e. an angle of $17.53^\circ$.
Convert to per unit and then to primary amperes. With the bus held at rated
voltage the per-unit current equals the per-unit apparent power, and the per-unit current is
the same on both sides of the transformer — that is the whole convenience of the
method:
$$I_{pu}=\frac{S_{tot}}{S_{base}}\Big/|V_{pu}|=\frac{271.82}{500}=0.5436\ \text{pu}
\ \angle-17.53^\circ$$
Multiplying by the high-voltage base current found in step 2,
$$I_{HV}=0.5436\times 23.094=\boxed{12.56\ \text{A at }0.9535\ \text{pf lagging}}$$
The same per-unit current on the secondary is $0.5436\times 481.13=261.6$ A, and
$261.6/12.56=20.83$ recovers the turns ratio, which is the arithmetic check on the answer.
Part (d) — load the spare feeder up to the nameplate, not up to the base.
The limit is the transformer's own 300 kVA rating, not the 500 kVA study base. Adding a
unity-power-factor block $P_{L1}$ leaves the reactive demand unchanged, so
$$\left(P_{tot}+P_{L1}\right)^{2}+Q_{tot}^{2}=S_{T1,rated}^{2}
\;\Longrightarrow\;
P_{L1}=\sqrt{300^{2}-81.89^{2}}-259.19$$
Evaluating, $\sqrt{90\,000-6\,706.6}=288.61$ kW, hence
$$\boxed{P_{L1,max}=29.41\ \text{kW at unity power factor}}$$
At that loading the transformer sits at exactly 300 kVA and $0.962$ power factor lagging. The
result is modest because the reactive demand of the motor and the 150 kW heater already consume
$271.8/300=90.6\ \%$ of the nameplate.
Check — reading of the source
Part (b) of the printed paper asks for "the motor load M2", but the single-line diagram shows only one motor, labelled M1, and no element anywhere on the paper is called M2. The reading taken here is that M2 is a typographical slip for M1. Part (d) is answered against the transformer nameplate of 300 kVA; if a marker instead intends "without exceeding the 500 kVA base", the answer would be $P_{L1}=\sqrt{500^{2}-81.89^{2}}-259.19=234.1$ kW. The nameplate reading is the physically meaningful one — a base is a bookkeeping choice, not a rating.
Quantity
Result
(a) High-voltage base voltage
12.5 kV (line-to-line)
(a) High-voltage base current
23.09 A
(a) High-voltage base impedance
312.5 Ω
(b) Transformer T1 reactance on 500 kVA base
j0.1667 pu
(b) Motor M1 equivalent impedance
2.931 + j2.198 pu (3.663 ∠ 36.87° pu)
(c) Plant loading with L1 open
259.19 kW + j81.89 kVAr = 271.82 kVA, pf 0.9535 lag