22-Elec-B9 Electromagnetic Field, Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Radiation · May 2013
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Exams, May 2013 — 07-Elec-B9, Electromagnetic Field, Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Radiation. Three hours, closed book; an approved Casio or Sharp calculator is permitted. Eight questions are printed and five constitute a complete paper, each of equal value (20 marks); the first five appearing in the answer book are the ones marked. The cover page supplies only two aids, $\varepsilon_0 = 8.85\times 10^{-12}\ \text{F/m}$ and $\mu_0 = 4\pi\times 10^{-7}\ \text{H/m}$, plus a Smith chart on page 4. Candidates are urged to state any interpretation assumptions with their answers. All eight questions are solved below, because this set is a study resource rather than a three-hour sitting.
Reference texts. D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, 4th ed. (transmission lines, the Smith chart, waveguides and cavities); M. N. O. Sadiku, Elements of Electromagnetics, 7th ed. and W. H. Hayt & J. A. Buck, Engineering Electromagnetics, 9th ed. (plane waves, oblique incidence, radiation); C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed. (short elements, arrays, apertures); F. T. Ulaby & U. Ravaioli, Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics, 8th ed. (radar equation, ground-plane imaging). SI units throughout; the paper's own $c = 3\times 10^{8}\ \text{m/s}$ and $Z_0 = 377\ \Omega$ are used so that the printed aids reproduce exactly.
Check: reading of the printed data. Some symbols are printed loosely. Question 3 prints “10GH” and “1KWs total energy”; these are read as a 10 GHz carrier and a total pulse energy of $1\ \text{kW}\cdot\text{s} = 1000\ \text{J}$. Question 6 prints “15 MH” (15 MHz) and the aid $R_{\text{rad}} = (2\pi/3)Z_0 (l/\lambda)^2$. Question 7 prints “10GH” (10 GHz) and the aid $\theta_0 = 1.2\lambda/d$. Question 8 prints “an 600 angle” ($60^\circ$).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. A plane wave inside a dielectric striking the boundary with vacuum from the dense side.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum wavelength | $\lambda_0$ | 0.6 µm |
| Relative permittivity of the medium | $\varepsilon_r$ | 2.25 |
| Refractive index of the medium | $n_1$ | 1.5 |
| Second medium | $n_2$ | 1.0 (vacuum) |
| Angle of incidence | $\theta_1$ | $60^\circ$ |
| Polarisation | — | E parallel to the interface (perpendicular / TE / s) |
Find. The phase of the reflected wave relative to the incident wave at the interface.
Approach. Test the incidence angle against the critical angle, recognise that “E parallel to the interface” means perpendicular (TE) polarisation, evaluate the Fresnel coefficient with an imaginary transmitted cosine, and read off its argument.
The phase shift is the whole physical content of total internal reflection beyond the trivial statement that all the power comes back. Because it depends on both the angle and the polarisation, a wave that is not purely TE or TM emerges elliptically polarised — the principle of the Fresnel rhomb, which converts linear to circular polarisation using two total reflections instead of a birefringent plate. The same phase shift, accumulated over many reflections, is what fixes the propagation constants of the guided modes in a step-index optical fibre.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Critical angle | $\theta_c = 41.81^\circ$ |
| Regime at $60^\circ$ | total internal reflection |
| Reflection coefficient magnitude | $|r_{\perp}| = 1$ |
| Relative phase of reflected wave | lags by $95.74^\circ$ (1.671 rad) |
| Reflectance | $|r|^{2} = 1$ (100 % reflected) |
| Evanescent decay length in the vacuum | 115 nm |
Check: sign convention. The $e^{j\omega t}$ convention is used with the evanescent field written as $e^{-\alpha z}$, which fixes $n_2\cos\theta_2 = +j\,0.8292$ and makes the reflected wave lag. Texts using $e^{-i\omega t}$ obtain $+95.74^\circ$; the magnitude of the relative phase, $95.74^\circ$, is the convention-independent answer.