18-Env-A1 Principles of Environmental Engineering · December 2015
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exam — December 2015 — 04-Env-A1 Principles of Environmental Engineering (Closed Book, 3 hours; candidate-prepared 8½×11" double-sided aid sheet permitted). Any five (5) of the seven (7) problems below constitute a complete paper; all seven are solved here as a full study resource.
Reference texts: Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 6th ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; Mihelcic & Zimmerman, Environmental Engineering: Fundamentals, Sustainability, Design; MWH's Water Treatment: Principles and Design, 3rd ed.; Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (Health Canada); Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) water quality guidelines; Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA, 1999).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Lake volume | V | 1×105 m³ |
| Industrial (mine) inflow | Qu | 1×105 m³/yr |
| Lake outflow | Q0 | 1×105 m³/yr |
| Outflow NH3 concentration (= lake concentration, well-mixed) | C0 | 50 mg/L |
| First-order NH3 decay rate in the lake | k | 0.2 /yr |
Find. The NH3 concentration Cu in the industrial (mine) inflow that sustains C0 = 50 mg/L at steady state.
Approach. Write a steady-state mass balance on NH3 around the lake as a continuously-stirred reactor (CSTR) with a first-order decay sink, then solve for the unknown inflow concentration.
| Result | Value |
|---|---|
| Required industrial-stream NH3 concentration, Cu | 60 mg/L |
A primary disinfectant is applied at the treatment plant to achieve the inactivation credit (the "CT" dose) required to destroy pathogenic bacteria, viruses and protozoa (e.g., Giardia, Cryptosporidium) in the raw or partially treated surface water before it leaves the plant. Ozone (O3), ultraviolet (UV) light, and free chlorine are the common primary disinfectants used in Canadian surface-water treatment plants; ozone and UV are favoured where the raw water carries high natural organic matter (NOM), because reacting free chlorine with NOM generates regulated disinfection by-products (DBPs) such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs). Ozone and UV, however, leave no lasting residual once the water enters the pipe network.
A secondary disinfectant is instead chosen for its ability to persist as a measurable, stable residual as the water travels through the distribution system, protecting against recontamination, biofilm regrowth and cross-connections between the treatment plant and the consumer's tap. Free chlorine or, more commonly on longer/looped Canadian distribution systems, chloramines (formed by adding ammonia after chlorine) serve this role because chloramines decay much more slowly than free chlorine and produce far fewer DBPs over long residence times, even though they are weaker, slower oxidants at the point of application. Canadian utilities following the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality therefore commonly practice a two-stage strategy: a strong primary disinfectant (ozone/UV/free chlorine) achieves the CT inactivation credit at the plant, and a milder, persistent secondary disinfectant (chloramine or a small free-chlorine residual) is maintained throughout distribution, monitored at representative sampling points to ensure a detectable residual reaches every consumer.
Given.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Octanol–water partition coefficient (log) | log Kow | 3.6 |
| Aqueous-phase concentration | Caq | 1 mg/L |
| Soil organic carbon fraction | foc | 0.2% = 0.002 |
| Porosity (pore water fraction of aquifer volume) | n | 0.50 |
Find. The fraction of contaminant mass residing in the aqueous phase versus sorbed to the solid (aquifer matrix) phase.
Approach. Use the supplied Kow–Koc correlation to get the organic-carbon partition coefficient, scale it by foc to get the bulk soil–water distribution coefficient Kp, then combine Kp with the aquifer's porosity and bulk density to split total contaminant mass between the pore water and the solid matrix.
| Result | Value |
|---|---|
| Carbon sorption coefficient, Koc | ≈ 506 L/kg |
| Soil–water distribution coefficient, Kp | ≈ 1.01 L/kg (mL/g) |
| Fraction dissolved in pore water | ≈ 27% |
| Fraction sorbed to the solid matrix | ≈ 73% |