18-Env-A1 Principles of Environmental Engineering · May 2017
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams — May 2017 — 04-Env-A1 / Principles of Environmental Engineering. 3 hours duration; closed book with a candidate-prepared 8.5×11 in double-sided aid sheet; Casio or Sharp approved calculator only. Any five questions constitute a complete paper (first five answers marked); all seven are solved below for completeness. Each question is worth 20 marks.
Reference texts. Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.); Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (5th ed.); MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design (3rd ed.); Sawyer, McCarty & Parkin, Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science; Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (Health Canada); Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) water-quality and municipal solid-waste guidelines; Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA) and Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA 2012); ISO 14040/14044 (Life Cycle Assessment); Bies & Hansen, Engineering Noise Control; Andrews, Canadian Professional Engineering and Geoscience (professional ethics).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Industrial expansion, broad-based economic growth and urban expansion each stress the same three environmental media — air emissions, water demand and wastewater treatment — but through somewhat different mechanisms and at different scales, which is why the same nine-cell comparison is instructive: it forces a distinct pair of impacts and matching engineering solutions for each intersection rather than one generic answer.
| 2 Impacts & 2 Solutions | (i) Industrial Expansion | (ii) Economic Growth | (iii) Urban Expansion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air Emissions | Impacts: increased point-source SO2/NOx/particulate/VOC emissions from added process and combustion units; higher facility-level GHG output. Solutions: mandatory best-available-control-technology (BACT) scrubbers/baghouses/catalytic controls on new/expanded units; facility-wide emissions cap-and-trade or offset requirements tied to permitting. |
Impacts: higher aggregate vehicle-kilometres travelled and freight movement raising regional NOx/VOC/GHG loads; increased electricity demand raising emissions at the generating source. Solutions: fuel-efficiency/zero-emission-vehicle standards and transit investment to decouple travel demand from emissions; renewable/low-carbon electricity procurement for new growth-driven load. |
Impacts: concentrated mobile-source emissions and traffic congestion; loss of vegetation/urban heat-island effect worsening local air quality and ground-level ozone formation. Solutions: transit-oriented, mixed-use zoning to shorten trip lengths; urban tree-canopy and green-infrastructure requirements in development approvals. |
| Water Demand | Impacts: large new process/cooling water withdrawals stressing local supply and competing with other users; potential lowering of groundwater tables near withdrawal wells. Solutions: mandatory water-recycling/closed-loop process water systems; water-use permitting with withdrawal caps tied to environmental-flow requirements. |
Impacts: rising per-capita and commercial water consumption region-wide; increased demand for potable-quality water for non-potable uses (irrigation, industrial). Solutions: tiered/increasing-block water pricing to incentivize conservation; expanded non-potable reuse (reclaimed water) systems for irrigation and industrial demand. |
Impacts: expanded service-area demand outpacing existing treatment/distribution capacity; increased impervious surface reducing natural aquifer recharge. Solutions: low-impact development (LID) and green infrastructure to sustain recharge; phased water-supply master planning tied to development approvals. |
| Wastewater Treatment | Impacts: higher-strength or novel industrial process wastewater exceeding municipal sewer-use bylaw limits; risk of upset to biological treatment from shock industrial loads. Solutions: mandatory industrial pretreatment programs before sewer discharge; on-site treatment/pre-treatment trains sized for the specific industrial contaminant profile. |
Impacts: rising aggregate flow and organic loading to municipal treatment plants as consumption grows; increased nutrient (N/P) loading to receiving waters. Solutions: staged capacity expansion/upgrade of treatment plants ahead of demand; tertiary nutrient-removal upgrades to protect receiving-water quality. |
Impacts: increased impervious area driving combined-sewer overflow (CSO) frequency and stormwater-driven hydraulic overload at the plant. Solutions: separation of combined sewers or CSO storage/treatment facilities; distributed stormwater management (LID, detention) to reduce peak flows reaching the collection system. |