18-Env-A2 Hydrology and Municipal Hydraulics Engineering · December 2017
Question 6 of 7
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2017 — 04-Env-A2 Hydrology and Municipal Hydraulics Engineering (3 hours, closed book with an 8½×11 candidate aid-sheet). Instructions state any five (5) of the seven problems constitute a complete paper (100 marks); all seven are solved in full below for completeness.
Reference texts: Linsley, Kohler & Paulhus, Hydrology for Engineers; Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics; Walski et al., Advanced Water Distribution Modeling and Management; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering.
(i) Pressure head at B and D, series pipes A–B–C–D (8 marks)
Given.
Fig. 5 — Three pipes in series, A–B–C–D, with a diameter increase (expansion) at each node.
Pipe
D (mm)
L (m)
f
1 (A–B)
250
1500
0.02
2 (B–C)
350
1200
0.03
3 (C–D)
400
2000
0.04
$Q=100\ \text{L/s}=0.1\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}$ throughout (series, no branching); $p_A/\gamma=50$ m; $z_A=10$, $z_B=20$, $z_C=30$, $z_D=40$ m.
Check: no minor-loss coefficient is given for the sudden expansions at B and C; the friction losses computed below (Darcy–Weisbach, given $f$ per pipe) dominate the head budget, and the Borda–Carnot expansion losses ($\approx(V_1-V_2)^2/2g\approx0.05$ m at B, $\approx0.003$ m at C) are small enough to be immaterial to either answer, so they are not carried through the main calculation.
Find. Pressure head $p_B/\gamma$ and $p_D/\gamma$.
Approach. Continuity gives the same $Q$ (hence a different $V$) in every pipe; apply the energy equation node-to-node along the series path, accumulating elevation change and Darcy–Weisbach friction loss in each pipe.
Pressure head at B (same pipe, same $D$, from A to B — velocity head cancels):
$$\frac{p_B}{\gamma} = \frac{p_A}{\gamma}+z_A-z_B-h_{f1} = 50+10-20-25.4 = \boxed{14.6\ \text{m}}$$
Continue to C, then D.
$$\frac{p_C}{\gamma} = \frac{p_B}{\gamma}+z_B-z_C-h_{f2} = 14.6+20-30-5.7 = -1.1\ \text{m}$$
$$\frac{p_D}{\gamma} = \frac{p_C}{\gamma}+z_C-z_D-h_{f3} = -1.1+30-40-6.5 = \boxed{-17.5\ \text{m}}$$
Check: the computed pressure head at D (≈ −17.5 m gauge) is below the practical vapour-pressure/cavitation limit for water (≈ −10.3 m gauge at sea level and 20 °C); in practice this pipeline could not actually deliver 100 L/s to D against this elevation profile from only a 50 m head at A — the flow would separate (cavitate) upstream of D, and a booster pump or larger-diameter pipe would be required. The answer is reported as computed, with this physical limit flagged.
Quantity
Value
$V_1,V_2,V_3$
2.04, 1.04, 0.80 m/s
$h_{f1},h_{f2},h_{f3}$
25.4, 5.7, 6.5 m
$p_B/\gamma$
14.6 m
$p_D/\gamma$
−17.5 m (below cavitation limit — see the check note)
(ii) Hardy Cross method and the two conservation principles (6 marks)
The Hardy Cross method solves a looped pipe network by iterative correction of an initially assumed (but continuity-satisfying) set of pipe flows. In each closed loop of the network, a flow correction $\Delta Q = -\dfrac{\sum K Q|Q|^{n-1}}{n\sum K|Q|^{n-1}}$ (with $K$ the pipe resistance coefficient and $n=1.85$ for Hazen-Williams or $n=2$ for Darcy-Weisbach) is computed from the loop's current head-loss imbalance and applied to every pipe in that loop; the process repeats, loop by loop, until all loop head-loss imbalances are acceptably small.
The method enforces the network's two governing conservation principles simultaneously: (1) continuity (mass conservation) at every junction — the initial flow assignment is chosen so inflow equals outflow at each node, and because $\Delta Q$ is applied identically to every pipe of a loop, every correction step preserves this nodal balance automatically; and (2) energy conservation around every closed loop — in a true solution the sum of head losses (signed by assumed flow direction) around any closed loop must be zero, since starting and ending at the same node/elevation the net head change must vanish; the iterative $\Delta Q$ correction is derived specifically to drive this loop head-loss sum toward zero without disturbing the nodal continuity already satisfied.
(iii) Sanitary sewer diameter, partial flow at 85% full (6 marks)
Given. $Q_d=5\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}$ at $y/D=0.85$; $S_0=3\%$; corrugated steel pipe, $n=0.02$; velocity must satisfy $0.6
Find. Required pipe diameter $D$.
Approach. Use the circular partial-flow geometric relations (central angle $\theta$ subtended by the water surface) with Manning's equation, solved for the diameter that delivers $Q_d$ at the specified depth ratio.
Central angle at $y/D=0.85$. From $y/D=\tfrac12(1-\cos(\theta/2))$:
$$\theta = 2\cos^{-1}(1-2\times0.85) = 2\cos^{-1}(-0.70) = 4.692\ \text{rad}\ (268.9^\circ)$$
Partial-flow area and hydraulic radius, in terms of $D$.
$$A=\frac{D^2}{8}(\theta-\sin\theta), \qquad R=\frac{D}{4}\cdot\frac{\theta-\sin\theta}{\theta}$$
Solve Manning's equation for $D$. $Q_d=\tfrac1n AR^{2/3}S_0^{1/2}$, with $A\propto D^2$ and $R\propto D$, reduces to $Q_d\propto D^{8/3}$; solving numerically for $Q_d=5\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}$:
$$D = \boxed{1.25\ \text{m}\ (1246\ \text{mm})}$$
Velocity check at this diameter. $A=\frac{(1.246)^2}{8}(\theta-\sin\theta)=1.104\ \text{m}^2$,
$$V = \frac{Q_d}{A} = \frac{5}{1.104} = \boxed{4.53\ \text{m/s}}$$
This satisfies $0.6
Select a commercial size. 1246 mm is not a standard manufactured corrugated-steel-pipe diameter; specifying the next commercial size up, $D=1350\ \text{mm}$, provides the required capacity at $y/D\le0.85$, and since velocity only decreases as $D$ increases at fixed $Q_d$, the resulting velocity remains comfortably within the 0.6–6 m/s window.