NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · December 2014

Question 6 of 6: Unconfined Aquifer — Well Drawdown & Tracer Travel Time

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2014 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. The first five questions as they appear in the answer book are marked (20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — weight–volume relations, compaction, seepage/flow nets, effective stress and shear strength chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for flow nets, method of fragments and shear strength; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law and the Dupuit–Thiem equation for unconfined radial flow to a well.

Question 6: Unconfined Aquifer — Well Drawdown & Tracer Travel Time (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Far-field saturated thickness, radius$h_0$, $R$7 m above bedrock at $R=4000$ m (unaffected)
Hydraulic conductivity$K$5 cm/s $=4320$ m/day
Porosity$n$35%
Observation well radii$r_1$, $r_2$10 m, 50 m
Pumping rate$Q$100 m³/day

Find. (a) drawdown at $r_1$ and $r_2$; (b) travel time for a conservative tracer from $r_1$ to $r_2$ (or $r_2$ to $r_1$, the direction of flow) at this pumping rate.

Approach. Apply the Dupuit–Forchheimer steady, unconfined, radial form of Darcy's law between the far-field radius of influence and each observation well to get the saturated thickness (hence drawdown) at $r_1$ and $r_2$, then integrate the porosity-corrected (actual) seepage velocity along the radial flow path between the two wells to get the travel time.

Impermeable horizontal bedrockGround surfaceStatic water tableDrawdown curve shown exaggerated for visibility(computed true drawdown is millimetre-scale)Pumping well, Q = 100 m³/dayr₁ = 10 mr₂ = 50 mUnconfinedaquifer, K= 4320 m/dayh₀ = 7 m above bedrock at R = 4000 m(unaffected, off-scale)
Figure 3. Unconfined aquifer with the pumping well and the two observation wells; the true drawdown is millimetre-scale given the very high $K$, so the curve is drawn exaggerated for visibility.
  1. Governing equation. Steady radial (Dupuit) unconfined flow between the far-field boundary and radius $r$ gives $$Q=\frac{\pi K\left(h_0^2-h(r)^2\right)}{\ln(R/r)}\ \Rightarrow\ h(r)=\sqrt{h_0^2-\frac{Q}{\pi K}\ln\!\left(\frac{R}{r}\right)}.$$
  2. Part (a) — drawdown at $r_1$ and $r_2$. With $K=4320\ \text{m/day}$, $h_0=7\ \text{m}$, $R=4000\ \text{m}$, $Q=100\ \text{m}^3/\text{day}$: $$h(10)=6.99685\ \text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ s_1=h_0-h(10)=\boxed{3.15\ \text{mm}},$$ $$h(50)=6.99769\ \text{m}\ \Rightarrow\ s_2=h_0-h(50)=\boxed{2.31\ \text{mm}}.$$
  3. Part (b) — tracer travel time. The actual (seepage) velocity at radius $r$ is the Darcy (superficial) velocity divided by porosity, $v(r)=\dfrac{Q}{2\pi r\,h(r)\,n}$, so the travel time between $r_1$ and $r_2$ is $$t=\int_{r_1}^{r_2}\frac{2\pi n\,r\,h(r)}{Q}\,dr.$$ Evaluating this integral numerically (with $h(r)$ from Step 1) gives $$t=\boxed{184.7\ \text{days}}\ (\approx6.1\ \text{months}).$$
Check: $K=5\ \text{cm/s}$ is at the very high end of natural aquifer permeability (clean gravel/karst range), which is why a normal municipal-scale pumping rate of 100 m³/day produces only millimetre-scale drawdowns at these radii — the arithmetic is correct, but a real well test at this Q would likely be too small a stress to resolve reliably against seasonal water-table noise, and a much higher Q would normally be used to develop a supply well in an aquifer this permeable.
QuantityValue
(a) Drawdown at $r_1=10$ m3.15 mm
(a) Drawdown at $r_2=50$ m2.31 mm
(b) Tracer travel time, $r_1\leftrightarrow r_2$184.7 days ($\approx$6.1 months)
Back to the paper →