NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · May 2014

Question 5 of 6: Undrained Slope Stability (φ=0)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2014 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. The first five questions as they appear in the answer book are marked (20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — weight–volume relations, USCS classification, seepage/flow nets, consolidation and slope-stability chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — cross-reference for consolidation theory and Taylor's stability-number method; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law and the Dupuit–Thiem equation for radial flow to a well.

Question 5: Undrained Slope Stability (φ=0) (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Slope height$H$5 m
Slope angle$\beta$45°
Unit weight$\gamma$17 kN/m³
Cohesion (undrained)$c$30 kPa
Friction angle$\phi$0°

Groundwater table below the firm base (dry/undrained total-stress analysis, no pore-pressure correction). The firm base coincides with the toe elevation, so the failure circle cannot extend below the toe — a Taylor "depth factor" $D=1$ toe circle.

Firm baseOR = 7.4 mβ = 45°H = 5 mc = 30 kPa, φ = 0, γ = 17 kN/m³Figure 3 — critical toe circle, β = 45°
Figure 3a — critical toe circle at β=45°, found by direct moment-equilibrium search (equivalent to reading Taylor's φ=0, D=1 stability-number chart).

Find. (a) factor of safety $FS$ at $\beta=45^\circ$; (b) the steepest $\beta$ for which $FS=1.5$.

Approach. With $\phi=0$, the resistance along any trial circular slip surface is simply $c$ (constant), so the factor of safety reduces to a moment balance: resisting moment from cohesion along the arc versus driving moment from the sliding mass's weight about the circle's centre. Because the firm base sits right at the toe ($D=1$), the critical circle must pass through the toe; its centre is found by minimizing $FS$ over all toe circles — the calculation Taylor's chart was built from.

  1. Set up the moment-equilibrium factor of safety. For a trial circle of radius $R$ centred at $O$, passing through the toe, subtending an arc of central angle $\theta$ (rad) up to its exit point on the ground surface, and enclosing a sliding mass of area $A$ whose centroid lies a horizontal distance $d$ from $O$ (measured toward the slope, i.e. away from the toe side): $$FS=\frac{M_{resist}}{M_{drive}}=\frac{c\,R\,\theta\times R}{\gamma A\,d}=\frac{c\,R^2\theta}{\gamma A\,d}.$$
  2. Part (a) — search over trial toe circles at $\beta=45^\circ$. Sweeping the centre $(x_c,y_c)$ over a grid and refining with a numerical (Nelder–Mead) search — each trial circle's enclosed area, centroid and arc angle computed directly by polygon integration — the minimizing circle gives $$FS_{\min}=\boxed{2.07}.$$ Expressed as Taylor's stability number, $N_s=FS\cdot\gamma H/c=2.07\times(17\times5/30)=5.87$, which sits in the expected range for a $D=1$, $\beta=45^\circ$ toe circle. As a check on the search method itself, running the identical routine at $\beta\to90^\circ$ (vertical cut) recovers $N_s\approx3.88$ — within 1–2% of the classical closed-form vertical-cut number $N_s=3.83$ — confirming the numerical search reproduces the textbook chart.
  3. Part (b) — find $\beta$ for $FS=1.5$. $FS$ falls monotonically as the slope steepens (steeper $\beta$ → less stable), so the target $FS=1.5<FS(45^\circ)=2.07$ requires a STEEPER slope than 45°. Repeating the same critical-circle search at a sequence of trial $\beta$ and root-finding on $FS(\beta)=1.5$ gives $$\boxed{\beta\approx81.6^\circ}$$ (check: the critical-circle search at $\beta=81.6^\circ$ returns $FS=1.500$).
Firm baseOR = 9.9 mβ = 81.577°H = 5 mc = 30 kPa, φ = 0, γ = 17 kN/m³ (β solved for FS=1.5)Figure 3 — critical toe circle, β = 81.577°
Figure 3b — critical toe circle at the solved β=81.6° (FS=1.5); note the circle centre shifts toward the downhill side as the slope steepens.
Check: an 81.6° slope in a real 5-m clay cut is close to a vertical face — it is a legitimate closed-form answer to "what β gives FS=1.5" under the stated idealization, but a designer would recognize it as an unusually steep, likely impractical slope and would normally target a larger safety margin than 1.5 for a near-vertical cut. Reported here exactly as the mathematics of the model gives it, per the question's own "calculate the maximum β" framing.
QuantityValue
Taylor stability number, $N_s$ (at β=45°)5.87
(a) Factor of safety at β=45°2.07
(b) β for FS = 1.5≈ 81.6°