NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A3 Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Engineering · May 2015

Question 3 of 6: Drainage-Ditch Slope Stability, φᶜ ≈ 0

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2015 — 04-Env-A3 / Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Engineering. 3 hours duration; open book exam, any non-communicating calculator permitted. The first five questions as they appear in the answer book are marked (20 marks each, 100 marks total); all six are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Braja M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering (9th ed.) — weight–volume relations, USCS classification, seepage/flow nets, slope-stability and stress-distribution chapters; Craig & Knappett, Craig's Soil Mechanics (8th ed.) — flow-net construction and Taylor's stability-number method; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (1979) — Darcy's law and the Dupuit–Thiem equation for radial flow to a well.

Question 3: Drainage-Ditch Slope Stability, φᶜ ≈ 0 (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Ditch depth$H$2.0 m
Side slope—2.5 horizontal : 1 vertical
Saturated unit weight$\gamma_{sat}$21 kN/m³
Undrained cohesion$c_u$30 kN/m² (kPa)

Find. (a) factor of safety $FS$ of the left side slope against undrained ($\phi_u\approx0$) shear failure; (b) qualitative effect of tile drainage pipes on stability.

H = 2 m2.5H : 1Vtrial toe circlesaturated clay, φᶜ ≈ 0
Fig. Q3 — 2 m deep ditch, 2.5H:1V side slopes, with a trial toe circle sketched for the φᶜ ≈ 0 (undrained) stability check.

Approach. For a purely cohesive ($\phi_u=0$) slope, Taylor's stability-number chart gives $FS=N_0\,c_u/(\gamma H)$ directly from the slope angle $\beta$; since no firm stratum is reported, use the deep-homogeneous-clay ($D\to\infty$) branch of the chart and note the more conservative toe-circle bound as a check.

  1. Slope angle and Taylor's stability number. $\beta=\arctan(1/2.5)=21.8^\circ$. Reading Taylor's $\phi_u=0$ chart (Das Ch. 12; Craig & Knappett Ch. 9) at this angle, with no firm layer indicated (homogeneous clay to depth), gives a stability number $N_0\approx6.45$.
  2. Factor of safety. $$FS=\frac{N_0\,c_u}{\gamma_{sat}H}=\frac{6.45\times30}{21\times2}=\boxed{FS\approx4.6}.$$
Check: the depth $D$ to a firm stratum is not stated. $N_0\approx6.45$ assumes deep, uniform clay ($D\to\infty$); if a firm layer instead sits right at the toe elevation ($D=1$), the toe-circle-only chart value is $N_0\approx5.53$ for any $\beta<53^\circ$, giving $FS=5.53\times30/42=3.95$. Either assumption clears $FS=3$ comfortably — the slope is stable with a substantial margin for this shallow 2 m cut.

(b) Tile drains lower the pore-water pressure in the clay behind the slope face by intercepting seepage before it can build up toward the toe, which raises the (drained) effective stress and, over the long term, improves stability relative to the undrained analysis above. In the short term, however, the trenching itself locally disturbs and loosens the soil along the slope, and a pipe that discharges onto the slope face rather than being carried well away can locally saturate and soften the toe, which would reduce — not improve — the factor of safety there; proper outletting of the drains away from the slope face is what makes them a net stabilizing measure.

QuantityValue
(a) Slope angle, $\beta$21.8° (2.5H:1V)
(a) Factor of safety, $FS$≈ 4.6 (≥ 3.9 even on the conservative toe-circle bound)
(b) Net effect of properly-outletted tile drainsStabilizing (lowers pore pressure)