18-Env-A4 Water and Wastewater Engineering · May 2013
Question 4 of 5: Secondary Clarifier Sizing and Return Activated Sludge
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2013 — 04-Env-A4 / Water and Wastewater Engineering. 3 hours duration; closed book with one double-sided aid sheet; approved calculator permitted. Question 1 is compulsory; the paper instructs candidates to attempt any three of the remaining four (100 marks total); all five are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (5th ed.) — BOD kinetics, activated-sludge clarifier design, anaerobic digestion; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.) — hardness, alkalinity, chlorination chemistry; MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design (3rd ed.) — rapid sand filtration; Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (Health Canada).
(a) Clarifier Volume, Surface Overflow Rate and Solids Loading Rate
Given.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Average plant (influent) flow
$Q$
15,000 m³/d
Clarifier hydraulic retention time
$t$
6.0 h
Side water depth
$h$
4.0 m
Mixed liquor suspended solids
MLSS
3000 mg/L
Find. Clarifier volume $\forall$, surface overflow rate SOR, and solids loading rate SLR.
Approach. Volume follows directly from $\forall=Q\,t$; the surface area needed for SOR/SLR follows from $A=\forall/h$; SOR uses the clear-water (overflow) flow $Q$, while SLR must use the FULL flow entering the clarifier — the combined mixed-liquor stream $Q+Q_r$ — because that is the flow actually carrying the MLSS solids into the tank; $Q_r$ is found in part (b) below and used here to complete SLR.
Surface area and surface overflow rate.
$$A=\frac{\forall}{h}=\frac{3750}{4.0}=937.5\ \text{m}^2,\qquad \text{SOR}=\frac{Q}{A}=\frac{15{,}000}{937.5}=\boxed{16.0\ \text{m}^3/(\text{m}^2\cdot\text{d})}.$$
Solids loading rate, using $Q_r=15{,}000$ m³/d from part (b). The clarifier's feed is the full mixed-liquor stream $Q+Q_r$ at concentration MLSS:
$$\text{SLR}=\frac{(Q+Q_r)\,\text{MLSS}}{A}=\frac{(15{,}000+15{,}000)\times3000}{937.5}=96{,}000\ \tfrac{\text{g}}{\text{m}^2\cdot\text{d}}=\boxed{96\ \text{kg/(m}^2\cdot\text{d})}.$$
Check: SOR≈16 m/d sits at the low (conservative) end of Metcalf & Eddy's typical average-flow range for secondary clarifiers following activated sludge (16–28 m/d), and SLR≈96 kg/(m²·d) is likewise near the low end of the typical 96–144 kg/(m²·d) range — both indicate a conservatively (not under-) sized clarifier. If SLR were instead computed on the influent flow $Q$ alone (a simpler but less rigorous convention some texts use), it would read 48 kg/(m²·d); the $Q+Q_r$ form is used here because it is the mass balance that actually governs solids capture in the clarifier.
Quantity
Value
Clarifier volume, $\forall$
3750 m³
Surface area, $A$
937.5 m²
Surface overflow rate, SOR
16.0 m³/(m²·d)
Solids loading rate, SLR (uses $Q_r$ from part b)
96 kg/(m²·d)
(b) Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Flow Rate
Given.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Average plant flow
$Q$
15,000 m³/d
Mixed liquor suspended solids
MLSS
3000 mg/L
RAS (underflow) TSS concentration
$X_r$
6000 mg/L
Find. The return activated sludge flow rate $Q_r$.
Approach. Write a steady-state solids mass balance around the clarifier: everything entering with the combined flow $(Q+Q_r)$ at concentration MLSS must leave either as clarified effluent (assumed essentially solids-free, $X_e\approx0$) or as RAS underflow at concentration $X_r$.
Solids mass balance around the clarifier.
$$(Q+Q_r)\,\text{MLSS}=Q\,X_e+Q_r\,X_r\ \xrightarrow{X_e\approx0}\ (Q+Q_r)\,\text{MLSS}=Q_r\,X_r.$$
Expand and isolate $Q_r$.
$$Q\cdot\text{MLSS}+Q_r\cdot\text{MLSS}=Q_r\,X_r\ \Rightarrow\ Q\cdot\text{MLSS}=Q_r\left(X_r-\text{MLSS}\right)\ \Rightarrow\ Q_r=\frac{Q\cdot\text{MLSS}}{X_r-\text{MLSS}}.$$
Substitute the given values.
$$Q_r=\frac{15{,}000\times3000}{6000-3000}=\frac{4.5\times10^{7}}{3000}=\boxed{15{,}000\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}}.$$
Check: this corresponds to a return-sludge ratio $Q_r/Q=1.0$ (100%), which is squarely within the typical activated-sludge RAS design range (50–150% of influent flow for conventional/complete-mix processes), and closes the loop with the SLR computed in part (a) — using this $Q_r$ there gives 96 kg/(m²·d), inside the typical range, which cross-checks that the mass balance's $X_e\approx0$ assumption is reasonable.