NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A4 Water and Wastewater Engineering · May 2013

Question 4 of 5: Secondary Clarifier Sizing and Return Activated Sludge

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2013 — 04-Env-A4 / Water and Wastewater Engineering. 3 hours duration; closed book with one double-sided aid sheet; approved calculator permitted. Question 1 is compulsory; the paper instructs candidates to attempt any three of the remaining four (100 marks total); all five are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (5th ed.) — BOD kinetics, activated-sludge clarifier design, anaerobic digestion; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.) — hardness, alkalinity, chlorination chemistry; MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design (3rd ed.) — rapid sand filtration; Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (Health Canada).

Question 4: Secondary Clarifier Sizing and Return Activated Sludge (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) Clarifier Volume, Surface Overflow Rate and Solids Loading Rate

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Average plant (influent) flow$Q$15,000 m³/d
Clarifier hydraulic retention time$t$6.0 h
Side water depth$h$4.0 m
Mixed liquor suspended solidsMLSS3000 mg/L

Find. Clarifier volume $\forall$, surface overflow rate SOR, and solids loading rate SLR.

Approach. Volume follows directly from $\forall=Q\,t$; the surface area needed for SOR/SLR follows from $A=\forall/h$; SOR uses the clear-water (overflow) flow $Q$, while SLR must use the FULL flow entering the clarifier — the combined mixed-liquor stream $Q+Q_r$ — because that is the flow actually carrying the MLSS solids into the tank; $Q_r$ is found in part (b) below and used here to complete SLR.

  1. Clarifier volume. $$\forall=Q\,t=15{,}000\ \tfrac{\text{m}^3}{\text{d}}\times\left(\frac{6.0}{24}\ \text{d}\right)=\boxed{3750\ \text{m}^3}.$$
  2. Surface area and surface overflow rate. $$A=\frac{\forall}{h}=\frac{3750}{4.0}=937.5\ \text{m}^2,\qquad \text{SOR}=\frac{Q}{A}=\frac{15{,}000}{937.5}=\boxed{16.0\ \text{m}^3/(\text{m}^2\cdot\text{d})}.$$
  3. Solids loading rate, using $Q_r=15{,}000$ m³/d from part (b). The clarifier's feed is the full mixed-liquor stream $Q+Q_r$ at concentration MLSS: $$\text{SLR}=\frac{(Q+Q_r)\,\text{MLSS}}{A}=\frac{(15{,}000+15{,}000)\times3000}{937.5}=96{,}000\ \tfrac{\text{g}}{\text{m}^2\cdot\text{d}}=\boxed{96\ \text{kg/(m}^2\cdot\text{d})}.$$
Check: SOR≈16 m/d sits at the low (conservative) end of Metcalf & Eddy's typical average-flow range for secondary clarifiers following activated sludge (16–28 m/d), and SLR≈96 kg/(m²·d) is likewise near the low end of the typical 96–144 kg/(m²·d) range — both indicate a conservatively (not under-) sized clarifier. If SLR were instead computed on the influent flow $Q$ alone (a simpler but less rigorous convention some texts use), it would read 48 kg/(m²·d); the $Q+Q_r$ form is used here because it is the mass balance that actually governs solids capture in the clarifier.
QuantityValue
Clarifier volume, $\forall$3750 m³
Surface area, $A$937.5 m²
Surface overflow rate, SOR16.0 m³/(m²·d)
Solids loading rate, SLR (uses $Q_r$ from part b)96 kg/(m²·d)

(b) Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Flow Rate

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Average plant flow$Q$15,000 m³/d
Mixed liquor suspended solidsMLSS3000 mg/L
RAS (underflow) TSS concentration$X_r$6000 mg/L

Find. The return activated sludge flow rate $Q_r$.

Approach. Write a steady-state solids mass balance around the clarifier: everything entering with the combined flow $(Q+Q_r)$ at concentration MLSS must leave either as clarified effluent (assumed essentially solids-free, $X_e\approx0$) or as RAS underflow at concentration $X_r$.

  1. Solids mass balance around the clarifier. $$(Q+Q_r)\,\text{MLSS}=Q\,X_e+Q_r\,X_r\ \xrightarrow{X_e\approx0}\ (Q+Q_r)\,\text{MLSS}=Q_r\,X_r.$$
  2. Expand and isolate $Q_r$. $$Q\cdot\text{MLSS}+Q_r\cdot\text{MLSS}=Q_r\,X_r\ \Rightarrow\ Q\cdot\text{MLSS}=Q_r\left(X_r-\text{MLSS}\right)\ \Rightarrow\ Q_r=\frac{Q\cdot\text{MLSS}}{X_r-\text{MLSS}}.$$
  3. Substitute the given values. $$Q_r=\frac{15{,}000\times3000}{6000-3000}=\frac{4.5\times10^{7}}{3000}=\boxed{15{,}000\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}}.$$
Check: this corresponds to a return-sludge ratio $Q_r/Q=1.0$ (100%), which is squarely within the typical activated-sludge RAS design range (50–150% of influent flow for conventional/complete-mix processes), and closes the loop with the SLR computed in part (a) — using this $Q_r$ there gives 96 kg/(m²·d), inside the typical range, which cross-checks that the mass balance's $X_e\approx0$ assumption is reasonable.
QuantityValue
Return activated sludge flow rate, $Q_r$15,000 m³/d
Recycle ratio, $Q_r/Q$1.0 (100%)