NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A6 Solid Waste Engineering and Management · December 2018

Question 2 of 5: Composting Process, Odour and Product Quality

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examination, December 2018 — 18-Env-A6, Solid Waste Engineering and Management. 3 hours duration, closed book (one aid sheet permitted, written on both sides). Question 1 is compulsory; candidates were instructed to attempt any three of the remaining four questions — all five are answered in full below as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: Tchobanoglous, Theisen & Vigil, Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues; Vesilind, Worrell & Reinhart, Solid Waste Engineering; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.); CCME, Guidance Document on Landfill Gas Management; Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999.

Question 2: Composting Process, Odour and Product Quality (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Check
The source prints this question's third sub-part with the same letter "a." as the first (an exam typo, flagged by the extraction itself). It is answered below as part (c), consistent with the order it is printed in and with the mark total (9+9+7=25) confirming three, not two, sub-parts.

(a) Steps in composting. (1) Receiving and preprocessing — incoming feedstock is inspected and sorted to remove contaminants (film plastic, glass, metal) and mechanically size-reduced (shredded or ground) to increase surface area for microbial attack. (2) Mixing and amendment — feedstock is blended, usually with a bulking agent (wood chips, yard trimmings) to bring the mix to the target C:N ratio of roughly 25–30:1 and a moisture content of 50–60%, while also improving porosity for aeration. (3) Active (high-rate) composting — the mix undergoes rapid aerobic decomposition through an initial mesophilic stage followed by a thermophilic stage (40–65°C), which is where the bulk of decomposition and pathogen destruction occurs, typically over 3–8 weeks with regular turning or forced aeration and moisture monitoring. (4) Curing/maturation — the partially stabilized material is held at lower intensity (near-ambient temperature) for several weeks to months so remaining readily degradable material stabilizes and phytotoxic compounds break down. (5) Screening and refining — the cured compost is screened to remove oversize material and residual contaminants and produce a uniform particle size. (6) Storage and marketing/distribution — the finished product is stockpiled and distributed to its end market (landscaping, agriculture, land reclamation).

(b) Key causes of odour in a composting facility. The dominant cause is the formation of anaerobic microsites within the pile: whenever aeration (turning frequency, or the air-supply rate in an ASP) is insufficient relative to the oxygen demand of the decomposing material, localized oxygen-depleted pockets develop and generate malodorous anaerobic by-products — hydrogen sulphide, organic acids (butyric, valeric) and amines — the classic "sour"/"rotten-egg" composting odour. Excess moisture compounds this directly, because water filling the pile's pore space physically excludes the oxygen that turning or forced air is trying to supply. A second cause is feedstock imbalance: an overload of high-nitrogen, high-moisture material (food waste, manure) relative to the carbon/bulking material overwhelms the pile's aerobic capacity and again drives it anaerobic. Poor pile management — infrequent turning, inadequate initial mixing that leaves un-blended pockets of raw feedstock, or an oversized pile whose core air cannot reach — produces the same effect mechanically rather than through feedstock chemistry. Finally, odour can also originate outside the active pile itself, from putrescible feedstock sitting in the receiving/tipping area before processing begins, or from ponded leachate/runoff at the site.

(c) Key parameters defining final compost product quality. Maturity/stability (how fully decomposition has progressed, assessed via respiration rate, a finished C:N ratio of roughly 15–20:1, or a self-heating test); moisture content (target ≈40–50% for stable handling and storage); particle size and uniformity after screening; pH (near neutral, roughly 6–8, for direct plant-growth use); nutrient content (total N–P–K and organic matter percentage, which determine its value as a soil amendment); physical and chemical contaminant levels (residual glass/plastic fragments; heavy metals; and pathogen indicators such as fecal coliform or Salmonella held below the regulatory threshold, confirming the thermophilic stage achieved adequate pathogen kill); absence of objectionable odour (a well-cured product should smell earthy, not sour or ammoniacal); and a germination/phytotoxicity bioassay confirming no residual phytotoxic compounds remain that would harm the plants the compost is applied to.