NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-A6 Solid Waste Engineering and Management · December 2019

Question 4 of 5: Landfill Gas Composition Trend and MSW Composition Analysis

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examination, December 2019 — 18-Env-A6, Solid Waste Engineering and Management. 3 hours duration, closed book (one aid sheet permitted, written on both sides). Question 1 is compulsory; candidates were instructed to attempt any three of the remaining four questions — all five are answered in full below as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: Tchobanoglous, Theisen & Vigil, Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues; Vesilind, Worrell & Reinhart, Solid Waste Engineering; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.); CCME, Guidance Document on Landfill Gas Management; Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999.

Question 4: Landfill Gas Composition Trend and MSW Composition Analysis (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) Key landfill gas constituents and their trend with landfill age. The key constituents are methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂), nitrogen (N₂), oxygen (O₂) and trace hydrogen sulphide, ammonia and non-methane organic compounds. Their relative abundance changes systematically as the refuse mass ages through the five biological phases (Question 5): freshly placed refuse is aerobic (Phase I), so the gas in the void space starts close to atmospheric — roughly 80% N₂ and 20% O₂, with a small amount of CO₂ from aerobic respiration. As the trapped oxygen is consumed and anaerobic conditions establish (Phase II, transition), N₂ and O₂ both fall steeply while CO₂ rises, since anaerobic and facultative organisms are now respiring without an external oxygen supply. Through Phase III (acid formation), CO₂ continues to climb toward a peak while CH₄ is still negligible, because the acidogenic/acetogenic bacteria of Question 2(a) are producing CO₂, H₂ and organic acids, not methane. Once the methanogenic population is established in Phase IV, CH₄ rises rapidly at CO₂'s expense until the two settle into an approximately steady 50–60% CH₄ / 40–50% CO₂ mixture, with N₂ and O₂ both essentially at zero; this composition then persists with only minor drift through Phase V (maturation) as gas generation gradually declines.

020406080100Gas composition (% by volume)Time / landfill age (qualitative)IInitialadjustmentIITransitionIIIAcidformationIVMethanefermentationVMaturationN₂O₂CO₂CH₄
Generalized trend in landfill gas composition (percent by volume) with landfill age, spanning the five biological phases: N₂ and O₂ (residual air) decay through Phases I–II, CO₂ rises to an early peak in Phase III (acid formation, no significant CH₄ yet), then CH₄ rises through Phase IV (methane fermentation) to dominance, and both CH₄/CO₂ hold roughly steady through Phase V (maturation).

Given. A 100 kg sample of municipal solid waste is broken down by component, each with its own moisture content and (as-discarded) density, as tabulated below.

ComponentMass per 100 kg (kg)Moisture (%)Density (kg/m³)
Paper257100
Organics5570300
Metal (Fe)103480
Glass72160
Ash38480

Find. The overall percent moisture, percent dry solids, and bulk density of this MSW sample.

Approach. Sum each component's moisture mass to get the total moisture mass and hence percent moisture directly from the 100 kg basis; convert each component's mass to a volume via its own density, sum those volumes, and take total mass over total volume for the correctly volume-weighted bulk density — never mass-weighting the individual densities directly, which systematically overstates density by over-crediting the small-volume, high-density components (metal, glass).

  1. Total moisture mass. Moisture mass per component $= m_i \times w_i$: Paper $25 \times 0.07 = 1.75$ kg; Organics $55 \times 0.70 = 38.50$ kg; Metal $10 \times 0.03 = 0.30$ kg; Glass $7 \times 0.02 = 0.14$ kg; Ash $3 \times 0.08 = 0.24$ kg. $$M_{moist} = 1.75+38.50+0.30+0.14+0.24 = 40.93\ \text{kg}$$
  2. Percent moisture and dry solids. On the 100 kg total-mass basis, $$\%\text{Moisture} = \dfrac{M_{moist}}{M_{tot}}\times 100\% = \dfrac{40.93}{100}\times100\% = \boxed{40.9\%}$$ Substituting, $$\%\text{Dry solids} = 100\% - 40.9\% = \boxed{59.1\%}$$
  3. Total volume, by component. Volume per component $= m_i / \rho_i$: Paper $25/100 = 0.2500$ m³; Organics $55/300 = 0.1833$ m³; Metal $10/480 = 0.0208$ m³; Glass $7/160 = 0.0438$ m³; Ash $3/480 = 0.0063$ m³. $$V_{tot} = 0.2500+0.1833+0.0208+0.0438+0.0063 = 0.5042\ \text{m}^3$$
  4. Bulk density. Dividing total mass by total volume, $$\rho_{bulk} = \dfrac{M_{tot}}{V_{tot}} = \dfrac{100\ \text{kg}}{0.5042\ \text{m}^3} = \boxed{198.3\ \text{kg/m}^3}$$
Check: a naive mass-weighted average of the five component densities (weighting each $\rho_i$ by its mass fraction directly, instead of converting to volume first) gives $263.6\ \text{kg/m}^3$ — about 33% higher than the correct volume-weighted result, because that shortcut over-credits the small-volume, high-density metal and glass fractions. The volume-weighted method above is the correct one and is used throughout.
QuantityValue
Total moisture mass40.93 kg (per 100 kg sample)
Percent moisture40.9%
Percent dry solids59.1%
Total volume0.504 m³ (per 100 kg sample)
Bulk density (volume-weighted)198.3 kg/m³