Question 3 of 6: Stormwater Models and Storm Sewer Design
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2016 — 04-Env-B2 / Water Resources. 3 hours duration; closed book; Casio or Sharp approved calculator only. Six Problems are printed; any five constitute a complete paper (the first five answered are marked). Each Problem is worth 20 marks. All six are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts. Linsley, Kohler & Paulhus, Hydrology for Engineers (3rd ed.); Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.); Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual (2003); Fisheries Act, Ontario Water Resources Act, Clean Water Act, 2006 (Ontario).
Problem 3: Stormwater Models and Storm Sewer Design (20 marks)
Models commonly used for Ontario stormwater and flood studies
Model
Type
Typical use
OTTHYMO
Hydrologic (rainfall-runoff)
Ontario-developed continuous/single-event hydrologic model, widely used for stormwater management design and master drainage plans across the province.
PCSWMM (built on EPA SWMM)
Hydrologic/hydraulic
GIS-integrated rainfall-runoff and sewer-network modeling for municipal stormwater and sanitary system design and capacity assessment.
HEC-HMS
Hydrologic (rainfall-runoff)
USACE watershed-scale hydrologic model used for design-storm runoff hydrographs feeding conveyance and detention design.
HEC-RAS
Hydraulic (open-channel/river)
The standard one/two-dimensional river hydraulic model used by Ontario conservation authorities for floodplain mapping and flood management studies.
(b) Storm Sewer Design — Areas A1 and A2
Given. Two sub-catchments in series, both draining to a common storm sewer alignment (A1 → MH1 → MH2, A2 joining at MH2 → outlet):
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Upstream area (A1)
$A_1$
0.70 ha
Incremental area (A2)
$A_2$
0.50 ha
Runoff coefficient
$C$
0.45
Time of concentration
$T_c$
12 min
IDF parameters (5-yr)
$A,B,c$
1330.31, 7.938, 0.855
Manning's roughness
$n$
0.013
Pipe slope
$S$
0.02 (2%)
Check: the question gives one $T_c=12$ min for the whole design and supplies no pipe length or design velocity for Pipe 1, so there is no way to compute the extra travel time down Pipe 1 to add to $T_c$ for Pipe 2. Per the exam's own instruction to state a reasonable assumption where information is missing, the same $T_c=12$ min (and hence the same design intensity $I$) is used for both pipes.
Find. The required pipe diameter for Pipe 1 (A1 → MH2) and Pipe 2 (MH2 → outlet, carrying A1+A2), sized so the 5-year design flow is conveyed without surcharging onto the street.
Approach. Get the design rainfall intensity from the IDF equation at $T_c$, compute each pipe's peak flow by the metric Rational Method (Pipe 2 uses the cumulative tributary area), then size each pipe from Manning's equation for full-pipe flow and round up to the next standard commercial diameter.
Design rainfall intensity. From the crib-sheet IDF equation $I=\dfrac{A}{(T_c+B)^c}$:$$I=\frac{1330.31}{(12+7.938)^{0.855}}=\frac{1330.31}{12.92}=\boxed{102.97\ \text{mm/h}}.$$
Peak flow, Pipe 1 (drains $A_1$ only). Metric Rational Method $Q=\dfrac{CIA}{360}$ ($Q$ in m³/s, $I$ in mm/h, $A$ in ha):$$Q_1=\frac{(0.45)(102.97)(0.70)}{360}=\boxed{0.0901\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}.$$
Size Pipe 1. Solving Manning's equation for a pipe flowing full, $Q=\dfrac{1}{n}\left(\dfrac{D}{4}\right)^{2/3}S^{1/2}\dfrac{\pi D^2}{4}$, for $D$ at $Q_1=0.0901$ m³/s gives $D_{req}=257$ mm; rounding up to the next commercial size, $D_1=\boxed{300\ \text{mm}}$. At full flow this pipe carries $Q_{full}=0.137$ m³/s ($>Q_1$, OK) at $V_{full}=1.93$ m/s.
Size Pipe 2. The same closed-form solve at $Q_2=0.1545$ m³/s gives $D_{req}=314$ mm; rounding up, $D_2=\boxed{375\ \text{mm}}$. At full flow this pipe carries $Q_{full}=0.248$ m³/s ($>Q_2$, OK) at $V_{full}=2.25$ m/s.
Check against flooding. Both commercial diameters carry more than the computed 5-year peak flow while flowing full, and both full-flow velocities (1.93 and 2.25 m/s) sit inside the conventional 0.6–3.0 m/s self-cleansing/non-scouring range for a sanitary/storm sewer — so the 5-year event is conveyed without surcharging onto the street.
Storm sewer layout: Catchment A1 drains through Pipe 1 to MH2, where Catchment A2 joins; Pipe 2 (sized for the combined 1.20 ha) conveys the total flow to the outlet.