NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B2 Water Resources · May 2016

Question 3 of 6: Stormwater Models and Storm Sewer Design

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2016 — 04-Env-B2 / Water Resources. 3 hours duration; closed book; Casio or Sharp approved calculator only. Six Problems are printed; any five constitute a complete paper (the first five answered are marked). Each Problem is worth 20 marks. All six are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts. Linsley, Kohler & Paulhus, Hydrology for Engineers (3rd ed.); Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics; Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.); Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual (2003); Fisheries Act, Ontario Water Resources Act, Clean Water Act, 2006 (Ontario).

Problem 3: Stormwater Models and Storm Sewer Design (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) Stormwater Models Used in Ontario

Models commonly used for Ontario stormwater and flood studies
ModelTypeTypical use
OTTHYMOHydrologic (rainfall-runoff)Ontario-developed continuous/single-event hydrologic model, widely used for stormwater management design and master drainage plans across the province.
PCSWMM (built on EPA SWMM)Hydrologic/hydraulicGIS-integrated rainfall-runoff and sewer-network modeling for municipal stormwater and sanitary system design and capacity assessment.
HEC-HMSHydrologic (rainfall-runoff)USACE watershed-scale hydrologic model used for design-storm runoff hydrographs feeding conveyance and detention design.
HEC-RASHydraulic (open-channel/river)The standard one/two-dimensional river hydraulic model used by Ontario conservation authorities for floodplain mapping and flood management studies.

(b) Storm Sewer Design — Areas A1 and A2

Given. Two sub-catchments in series, both draining to a common storm sewer alignment (A1 → MH1 → MH2, A2 joining at MH2 → outlet):

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Upstream area (A1)$A_1$0.70 ha
Incremental area (A2)$A_2$0.50 ha
Runoff coefficient$C$0.45
Time of concentration$T_c$12 min
IDF parameters (5-yr)$A,B,c$1330.31, 7.938, 0.855
Manning's roughness$n$0.013
Pipe slope$S$0.02 (2%)
Check: the question gives one $T_c=12$ min for the whole design and supplies no pipe length or design velocity for Pipe 1, so there is no way to compute the extra travel time down Pipe 1 to add to $T_c$ for Pipe 2. Per the exam's own instruction to state a reasonable assumption where information is missing, the same $T_c=12$ min (and hence the same design intensity $I$) is used for both pipes.

Find. The required pipe diameter for Pipe 1 (A1 → MH2) and Pipe 2 (MH2 → outlet, carrying A1+A2), sized so the 5-year design flow is conveyed without surcharging onto the street.

Approach. Get the design rainfall intensity from the IDF equation at $T_c$, compute each pipe's peak flow by the metric Rational Method (Pipe 2 uses the cumulative tributary area), then size each pipe from Manning's equation for full-pipe flow and round up to the next standard commercial diameter.

  1. Design rainfall intensity. From the crib-sheet IDF equation $I=\dfrac{A}{(T_c+B)^c}$:$$I=\frac{1330.31}{(12+7.938)^{0.855}}=\frac{1330.31}{12.92}=\boxed{102.97\ \text{mm/h}}.$$
  2. Peak flow, Pipe 1 (drains $A_1$ only). Metric Rational Method $Q=\dfrac{CIA}{360}$ ($Q$ in m³/s, $I$ in mm/h, $A$ in ha):$$Q_1=\frac{(0.45)(102.97)(0.70)}{360}=\boxed{0.0901\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}.$$
  3. Peak flow, Pipe 2 (drains cumulative $A_1+A_2=1.20$ ha).$$Q_2=\frac{(0.45)(102.97)(1.20)}{360}=\boxed{0.1545\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}.$$
  4. Size Pipe 1. Solving Manning's equation for a pipe flowing full, $Q=\dfrac{1}{n}\left(\dfrac{D}{4}\right)^{2/3}S^{1/2}\dfrac{\pi D^2}{4}$, for $D$ at $Q_1=0.0901$ m³/s gives $D_{req}=257$ mm; rounding up to the next commercial size, $D_1=\boxed{300\ \text{mm}}$. At full flow this pipe carries $Q_{full}=0.137$ m³/s ($>Q_1$, OK) at $V_{full}=1.93$ m/s.
  5. Size Pipe 2. The same closed-form solve at $Q_2=0.1545$ m³/s gives $D_{req}=314$ mm; rounding up, $D_2=\boxed{375\ \text{mm}}$. At full flow this pipe carries $Q_{full}=0.248$ m³/s ($>Q_2$, OK) at $V_{full}=2.25$ m/s.
  6. Check against flooding. Both commercial diameters carry more than the computed 5-year peak flow while flowing full, and both full-flow velocities (1.93 and 2.25 m/s) sit inside the conventional 0.6–3.0 m/s self-cleansing/non-scouring range for a sanitary/storm sewer — so the 5-year event is conveyed without surcharging onto the street.
Catchment A1 0.70 ha, C=0.45 MH1 Catchment A2 0.50 ha, C=0.45 MH2 Pipe 1: D=300 mm Q=0.090 m³/s, V=1.93 m/s Outlet Pipe 2: D=375 mm Q=0.154 m³/s, V=2.25 m/s Both pipes: S = 2%, Manning n = 0.013, flowing full A1 flows into MH1→MH2 (Pipe 1); A2 joins at MH2, Pipe 2 carries A1+A2 to the outlet.
Storm sewer layout: Catchment A1 drains through Pipe 1 to MH2, where Catchment A2 joins; Pipe 2 (sized for the combined 1.20 ha) conveys the total flow to the outlet.
QuantityValue
Design intensity, $I$102.97 mm/h
Pipe 1 design flow, $Q_1$0.0901 m³/s
Pipe 2 design flow, $Q_2$0.1545 m³/s
Pipe 1 diameter300 mm ($V_{full}=1.93$ m/s)
Pipe 2 diameter375 mm ($V_{full}=2.25$ m/s)