18-Env-B5 Industrial & Hazardous Waste Management · December 2017
Question 8 of 28: Interferences with Potable Water Supply Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20 Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28
Notes on this paper
Reference texts: Nemerow & Dasgupta, Industrial and Hazardous Waste Treatment , 2nd ed.; Metcalf & Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery , 5th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering , 6th ed.; LaGrega, Buckingham & Evans, Hazardous Waste Management , 2nd ed.; CCME, Guidelines for the Management of Biomedical Waste in Canada (1992); Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 1999; Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes (1989); Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) regulations on radioactive waste; provincial hazardous waste regulations (e.g. BC's Environmental Management Act and Hazardous Waste Regulation).
Question 8: Interferences with Potable Water Supply (3 marks)
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Taste, odour and colour (algae, decaying organics, industrial phenolics) — corrective action: activated-carbon adsorption (powdered or granular), oxidation (ozone, chlorine dioxide), or source control at the discharge.
Hardness and scaling minerals (Ca/Mg from an upstream industrial or agricultural discharge) — corrective action: lime-soda softening or ion exchange at the water-treatment plant.
Toxic/pathogenic contamination (heavy metals, pathogens, or an industrial spill reaching the intake) — corrective action: enhanced coagulation/filtration, disinfection upgrade, or relocating/protecting the intake, backed by source-water protection (watershed control, spill-response planning) to prevent recurrence.
Topic: Interferences with a potable-water treatment train and their remedies
Key relations: interference type → matched unit-process response (adsorption for taste/odour, softening for hardness, oxidation/disinfection for microbial and organic contaminants)
Why this works: a conventional water-treatment train (coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation-filtration-disinfection) is designed for typical raw-water quality; an upstream industrial or agricultural interference introduces a constituent the train was not sized for, so the corrective action is either an added unit process matched to that specific constituent, or preventing the interference at its source.
Common pitfall: proposing a single generic "add more chlorine" fix regardless of which interference is present, when taste/odour and hardness problems are not solved by disinfection at all.
Source: Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering , 6th ed.
Report an error in this solution